User talk:Sweetprashanth

Om Shanti Om
I did mean to hurt you but the "fact" you added is speculation, rumor, invented "facts" or a case of WP:OR. Source that "fact" by WP:RS. I would not object.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 15:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


 * It appears in the movie- you'll have to watch the movie to know that he speaks these lines. All the rest of the info- about the quote- I've provided only wikipedia links.

How can I find a RS for this info? Do you mean to say the synopsis of the movie has been supported by a RS? Is that not merely verified as correct by all users (who have watched the movie), or corrected accordingly?

The proof of the pudding is in the eating. The proof of this FACT is in the movie itself.

Sir, I would like to mention that it is all nice to have strict guidelines to be followed while editing a Wikipedia article, but arguing so much over something as obvious as this FACT is a waste of time. And that too it's a nice fact- nothing that leads users to spam, in fact it directs the users to some other sites of wikipedia itself (which wikipedia does encourage- it says in the section which talks about external links). This stand of Wikipedia over this matter only discourages genuine contributors from providing quality info.

And yes- I would surely do the needful to get myself acquainted with WP- the easiest way being adopted by a senior Wikipedian. But it'll take time- just like you I'm also heavily involved in real life, so I need to finish off those commitments afore I come here. Thanks for your advice anyway.

Sweetprashanth (talk) 17:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)