User talk:Sweety Roy765

Yyy

bahahah
hehehhe Sweety Roy765 (talk) 14:35, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sweety Roy765/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Sweety Roy765/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 12:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello Sweety Roy765. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sweety Roy765. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 12:05, 23 February 2023 (UTC)


 * @Fancy Refrigerator
 * Good evening.
 * Apologies for the uninformed writing. I will keep that in mind for future articles.
 * I am indeed associated with the organisation. I am an intern at Finderbridge.
 * Is there a particular way I could write an article about the organisation with a disclosure that it is written by an intern of the said organisation? Sweety Roy765 (talk) 12:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Please use Template:Paid or Template:UserboxCOI to disclose your connections. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 12:23, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Fancy Refrigerator Thank you. Noted. Paiduser (talk) 12:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)