User talk:Swetoniusz

A page you started (Łucja Okulicz-Kozaryn) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Łucja Okulicz-Kozaryn, Swetoniusz!

Wikipedia editor Usernamekiran just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"An editor has already tagged the article with notability issue. If possible, kindly add content that would establish the subject's notability. Thanks."

To reply, leave a comment on Usernamekiran's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— usernamekiran (talk)  20:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Leszek, Duke of Masovia
It is a pleasure to see a nice historic article like this, reminds me of my early Wikipedia days. I did an English c/e - please take a look at what was fixed if you want to use it to improve your English (which is pretty good overall) - and I assessed the article as B-class. For next level of assessment, see WP:GAN. I will be looking fwd to your next Wikipedia article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Jadwiga of Poland
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Borsoka (talk) 16:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring at Jadwiga of Poland
You may still avoid a block for edit warring if you agree to stop reverting and wait for consensus. Please give your answer at the noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Per the closure of this complaint, you are warned for edit warring. You may be blocked if you revert again at Jadwiga of Poland without getting a talk page consensus first. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Dobroniega Ludgarda of Poland
I will try to read it shortly, I was no short wiki break (holidays). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I c/e this for language, adding one cite needed. Nice job. May I suggest that you consider improving articles on more famous figures? As much as I personally like to write about some obscure figures myself, it is worth noting that such articles on such individuals are read maybe several times a year, but more popular articles (on Piast kings for example) are read dozens if not hundred times each day. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:51, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

WP:BRD
Why do you not abide by WP:BRD? Do you understand what that's about? Surtsicna (talk) 21:18, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Borsoka (talk) 03:16, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Please also remember my previous message that you deleted. Borsoka (talk) 03:16, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leszek, Duke of Masovia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leszek, Duke of Masovia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dobroniega Ludgarda of Poland
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dobroniega Ludgarda of Poland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leszek, Duke of Masovia
The article Leszek, Duke of Masovia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Leszek, Duke of Masovia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 20:01, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dobroniega Ludgarda of Poland
The article Dobroniega Ludgarda of Poland you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dobroniega Ludgarda of Poland for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 15:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Borsoka (talk) 13:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring at Mary, Queen of Hungary
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Swetoniusz. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mz7 (talk) 20:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Given your continued deception using the account, I have now extended your block on this account to indefinite. If you wish to be unblocked, you will need to read the guide to appealing blocks, then use the unblock template as explained in the block notice above. Mz7 (talk) 02:56, 5 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I did no use any other account on en wiki. It is revange of two wikipedians, Borsoka and Surtsicna, who regularly insulting me. Swetoniusz (talk) 20:59, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Unblock
After 1 April unil now I did not edit en.wiki. I was banned only by suspitions of two wikipedians Borsoka an Surtsicna who are insulting me as I try to improve some articles that they are usually editing.

CU should check my IP and alleged sockpuppets, as well as Borsoka and Surtsicna who may framed me.

Recenly I wrote two GA articles. I feel very disappointed how I am treating an also by fact that nobody try to stop two Wikipedians that insulting me and blacken me. Swetoniusz (talk) 21:17, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Unblock

 * pinging you so that you're both aware of this request. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the ping, . It did occur to me that the sockpuppets were being rather naive here, perhaps overly so. I was also rather perplexed at the situation because Swetoniusz seems to be a fairly established editor at pl.wiki, and noted behavioral differences at the April 6 SPI. I would be happy to unblock with sincere apologies to Swetoniusz if the checkuser results indicate this is someone trying to frame Swetoniusz ( apparently the technical information is indicating that the same person is framing  of sockpuppetry; the troll appears to be targeting editors who have been blocked for edit warring and creating throwaway accounts to "continue" the edit war and make it look like sockpuppetry). Currently, we're waiting for a second checkuser to verify Ponyo's results at SPI. Mz7 (talk) 21:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the above information. If he is not a master, he should not be blocked for sockpuppetry. I still think that he should accept that those who who do not agree with some of his edits are not insulting him and edit warring is not the proper way of editing WP articles. Borsoka (talk) 01:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You and Surtsicna falsely accused me of sockpuppeting. I am waiting for an apology. Swetoniusz (talk) 22:46, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I hope you brought supplies. Surtsicna (talk) 00:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * This senence show what kind of men you are. Swetoniusz (talk) 10:27, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * And what kind is that? Surtsicna (talk) 17:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

How long I have to wait for second CU who proofed my innocence? Swetoniusz (talk) 22:46, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * As soon as it is obvious that you are not a sock master, I will apologize. You should also realize that the adoption of your selfish style and frequent personal attacks enabled the impostor to track you (and me). You have not apologized for your behaviour for which you were punished. Borsoka (talk) 06:08, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I hope that you will edit using proply academic sources and not calumniate other editors. Swetoniusz (talk) 10:27, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Sorry, until you are unable to understand that Britannica is an authoritative source for proper English usage, you should not make negative comments about other editors. According to my own experiences, editors who cannot cooperate are sooner or later banned from this community. Sorry, I will not answer your personal attacks in the future and I will not apologize. The present ban put you at your proper place. Borsoka (talk) 16:14, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

No reason not to unblock the user. They haven't engaged in sockpuppetry per this. Sro23 (talk) 03:22, 15 April 2018 (UTC)