User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 2

Морков
This article „Морков“ is the Macedonian translation for the English article carrot. I don`t know, how to add this translation to the English version of the article. Could you help me?--Angelovska Aleksandra (talk) 00:17, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You don't "add it to the English version". Clearly you have not even looked at the Makedonski Wikipedia? The article mk:Морков already exists. Feel free to improve it. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:53, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I believe that the user is asking how to add the WP:Interlanguage link so that people can get from the English article to the Makedonski article, which you did (Angelovska, click that link to see how to do this in the future). The Carrot article is semi-protected, so adding it would have required an WP:Edit request, but normally it should be easy.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:02, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Морков
Thank you, but this is not my translation, I wanted to add my Macedonian translation, that corresponds to the English version of the article. Now I can`t find my translation for "Carrot". What should I do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelovska Aleksandra (talk • contribs) 10:53, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Go to mk:Корисник:Angelovska Aleksandra/Морков where you will find your version. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:13, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
The barnstar is very much appreciated. Have a great weekend! — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 16:24, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank You!
Thanks so much for the suggestions, I think I did what you instructed.

Quick question -- Why am I not finding my new Wiki page when I search for it on google and/or Wikipedia.com? Do I need to do something to make it go live?

I don't want to close the page where I created it because last time I did, I could not ever find it again and had to make a whole new one.

Please help!

JoeD&#39;Ambrosio (talk) 19:51, 18 May 2012 (UTC)Joe

Okay, that's comforting.

Now what if it's not pulling up even when I search it on Wikipedia like you advised? It still was not showing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoeD'Ambrosio (talk • contribs) 20:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry!
I see that you are patrolling a lot of my new pages. I've done around 250 today... --Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 20:01, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


 * No worries, I enjoy patrolling NPP and have been patrolling all day. Thanks again for the starting the articles. SwisterTwister   talk  20:03, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I've got 6000 beetle articles left (so far), so I won't run out! --Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 20:05, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!
- for the barnstar, though I  can't really see what I've done recently to deserve it ;) More to the point: thank you for all  your hard work  around here -  keep  it  up! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:45, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

- thank you for the barnstar, David. I appreciate it :) --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 08:53, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks from me too; it's much appreciated! And I agree with Kud: thank you for your hard work! Happy editing.  Salvio  Let's talk about it! 09:14, 19 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks from me as well!  Spencer T♦ C 14:53, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * And me also! WilliamH (talk) 19:28, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Ditto - thanks very much, much appreciated GiantSnowman 20:38, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Might as well park my thanks here. Your cheerful nature is much appreciated. Regards, P. D. Cook  Talk to me! 01:39, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks from me too! →B music ian 02:53, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

You're right about Eddy
There was a birth/death year hiding at a caption on the last page of the PDF ref, I've added the dates to the article. Anyway, just thought I'd clear up any doubt. Cheers! --joe deckertalk to me 05:41, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Tubevision Contest
Is it bad that I created a page for my youtube contest? (Tubevision Contest) Eurofan2005 (talk) 09:51, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Previous Rfd – Homestead Book Company resurrected
I am here as you were part of a previously Rfd discussion HERE. Based on the comments on the Rfd, I believe that this article could have been saved if it was cited better and written more in Wikipedia styling and formatting (Wikified article HERE). I have made substantial improvements to the article and reposted it. As you part of the discussion for Rfd (either you nominated or took part in the Rfd discussion), I wanted to personally notify you. While this is not an official Rfc, I would appreciate any feedback that you may have. I have not notified the original creator of the article as it does not look like they have made any contributions on Wikipedia since the article was deleted. --Morning277 (talk) 18:40, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

My special barnstar
Hello SwisterTwister! I was delighted to receive your surprise this evening, but also a little mystified. I would love to know what it was that brought me to your attention. Cheers! -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 22:35, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

I was patrolling recent changes for recently active users to award barnstars, and I saw you've been extremely active with vandalism removal. I wanted to say thanks to users for their contributions. :) SwisterTwister   talk  00:08, 20 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, it is always pleasing to be recognised. Encouragement from one's peers is most welcome.  I thank you.
 * -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 08:13, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks
Thanks for the barnstar, ST. Nice to know the work is appreciated. All best. -- Man way  02:13, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

RE: A barnstar for you!
Thank you :), I have the same feelings. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!  See terms and conditions.  02:55, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: A barnstar for you!
Thank you very much! It's really nice to know that my work is not completely meaningless. --Jaellee (talk) 09:37, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thank you very much. It is much appreciated. -- Gilderien Chat&#124;List of good deeds 09:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar
Cheers for the Barnstar, appreciate it! El0i (talk) 10:17, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thank you. What in particular did I do to deserve this? RolandR (talk) 10:51, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

thank you ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hayli812 (talk • contribs) 15:21, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Yay! My first barnstar!

Tow Trucker  talk  21:03, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 

Thank You
I didn't know reverting vandalism was so "special", but I appreciate the barnstar. Dan653 (talk) 22:56, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

User:World historia
I reported the editor User:World historia to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring and in the report I mentioned your name. Your input at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring is appreciated. --Kusunose 02:51, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Kusunose keeps vandalising my edits.
Please help me, SwisterTwister! Warn Kusunose please.

A wikipedian who appreciated your previous help.

Re: A barnstar for you!
Thank you for the barnstar! It is an honor to receive one from you. I've seen your name many times during RC patrol where my revert fails because you have already taken care of it. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:33, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Page Setup
hello, may i please have some instruction in setting up my page. Thanks, Jess — Preceding unsigned comment added by JessicaKate98 (talk • contribs) 15:32, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello
Was there anything you were trying to tell me ? Thanks Andrew Andrewdeacon51 (talk) 20:19, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the greeting
Any chance you can help me edit a big article? DJKillcrazy (talk) 06:55, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Well, I don;t know much about Wikipedia or computers so please bear with me - I live in Toronto and we have a goodly sized Park here called "Christie Pitts" verifiable by City of Toronto Parks and Recreation Telephone Book and also by me becasue I work for Travellers' Aid in Toronto and know it well - It appears that one Newspaper report from the 1950's misspelled it and called it "Christie Pits" which is one reference and that is now the name of the place that Wikipedia is using although it is clearly not correct because several other references are correctly cited using the proper spelling Pitts with 2 tt's - I am in here way over my head - I can;t even change the name of the article - nor am I even qualified to be talking to you on your talk page - I just noticed that you helped more people than anybody else and though that you might throw me a lifeline (or maybe even God willing somehow fix it and then it would all be okay and I could sleep nights and stay calm - I don;t know much about what to give you - except a lot of thanks - Janet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janetmackco (talk • contribs) 08:32, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks and sorry
Hi, Thanks for the barnstar, ST. Sorry I somehow missed it until now, I guess it got drowned by posts to my page made after yours. Cheers. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:46, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
yutsi Talk/  Contributions  02:15, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you SwisterTwister for helped me I really like my username Ashik Sahadath. what can i do for get this username permanent and I want to make protection for my userpage. Can u help me? (AshikSaha (talk) 06:48, 24 May 2012 (UTC)).

okay. i went to Changing username. what happens next? please help (AshikSaha (talk) 07:03, 24 May 2012 (UTC))

words of gratitude
thank you sir,kindly send me more scientific theories — Preceding unsigned comment added by M.lovingson singh (talk • contribs) 16:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Lyn-z
I was editing a picture to the page Lyn-z.She is the bassist for mindless self indulgence so i tought i should find her a picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josie111e (talk • contribs) 16:21, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback
I have made some adjustments to the article in the PWMG sandbox.

Please help me understand what steps I need to take to submit my article to Wikipedia (and get it moved out of my Sandbox).

thx from PWMGPWMG (talk) 16:27, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

view
Hello, Could you please give us your point of view about Jerash in this talk. It takes more than it really needs. Thanks a lot--  HF  ► 17:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thank you for the Barnstar! Dusty 777 19:28, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Dear SwisterTwister,

Thank you for your message. I'll follow those steps next time. Thank you very much.

Sincerely, CMasterman20 (talk) 02:56, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig.png or Insert-signature.png or by typing four tildes (Omega2064 (talk) 03:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 02:33, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * er... Where haven't I in the last year or two? Pointing out where the mistake was made would be more useful than a blank warning? Omega2064 (talk) 03:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

About the reply at my talk page
Thank you, but as you can see, 3 (2012) movie's page protection says ends at May 24, but yet it still active. And almost everytime I add something, people saying that it's protected by copyright thingy and but they can upload it themselves without that.

(Edit: Just figured it's gone now. Strange...) Sandakelum™ (talk) 06:09, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks... I'm editing that page and trying to improve it now. Please suggest any unclear things at there :) Sandakelum™ (talk) 06:09, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome message
Hi Thanks for the welcome, will do as requested re signature etc (didn't realize I was meant to do that).

Perhaps you can help ? I am having a problem getting the following link to work: TENS Protocol by Dr Deirdre Walsh (TENS Protocol by Dr Deirdre Walsh)

When I copy it from the original article/site and past it to word on my PC it works fine but when I past it in Wikipedia it comes up with " Firefox can't find the server at tens%20protocol%20by%20dr%20deirdre%20walsh.

I can copy and past it from Verity medicals site and it works, however I feel this would be putting in a bias as they sell TENS products.

I am tempted to remove it however feel it is important to the article as it is factual, has no bias and is the best freely available one written by professionals which explains the how and why of TENS.--Chrisandbev (talk) 07:26, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks


 * Hi, could you please participate in editing Jerash article according to the talk page. We wish to know your view.--  HF  ► 15:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for help with FCSI-The Americas page
I really appreciate the insight and guidance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.130.100.210 (talk) 16:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

thankyou!
thanks for the barnstar!-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  19:33, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

re:A barnstar for you!
Thank you very much for the star. regards -- Ignacio  (talk) 19:53, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you ST!
I'm Rich.Subtle. My real name is Richard Suttles.

I'm extremely new to all this and trying to figure things out. My instructor wanted us to build a Wikpedia page, and I noticed "Oculesics" redirected to "Eye Contact," and since our class is often on nonverbal communication I figured I'd take a stab at building an oculesics page, even though I'll clarify eye contact is a big part of the study and leave a link to that page.

I wasn't sure what you meant about verifying my signature or edit summaries. Tomorrow I'll try and take a closer look at the help page you gave me. I really appreciate this.

V/r,

R.S. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rich.Subtle (talk • contribs) 03:24, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

In paragraph 2, sentence 2, I think you may want to delete the word can:

If any users can have any questions, I'll

Otherwise, it's perfection! :-)

P.S. I wish people said about me the things they've said about you! You must be one awesome dude!!!

Pama73 (talk) 03:25, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Do you know about the Teahouse?
Hi there SwisterTwister. I see that you are always very busy over at the Feedback Dashboard and doing a great job.

I was wondering if you knew about the Teahouse - "We are here to help new editors become accustomed to community culture, ask questions, and develop community relationships – supporting you on your journey to become experienced Wikipedians.".

You seem to be acting as a Wiki Ambassador all on your own.

You're doing such a good job, I was wondering if the Teahouse could help out.

All the best! Media-Hound 'D 3rd P^) (talk)  13:51, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Can you please tell me how to delete a article. I am totally lost.

I created a User under Tonga Natiional Tag Team but that conflict with too many stuff. Now I want to delete the article etc and rewrite the article in my new user Sipooti. MANY THANKS!!00:44, 27 May 2012 (UTC)Sipooti± — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sipooti (talk • contribs)

LInk
Hi Thanks for fixing it Re: Much appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisandbev (talk • contribs) 05:29, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Link
Hi Sorry shouldn't have put in the ref on this talk, but think I understand how it works now.

Thanks once again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisandbev (talk • contribs) 05:34, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Thorough article
I edited the article on "Thorough" in British history because I felt that it reflected an outdated historiography; for instance, associating Presbyterianism and Puritanism with a specific political viewpoint that opposed Charles I and absolutism. I am unfamiliar with how to link keywords or topics so if you could give me a practical tutorial it would be greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voodoochild1990 (talk • contribs) 07:03, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Kc toros.
Please Do Not Delete It. This Team Is So Special To More Than 200 People In Kansas City Kansas. PLEASE Do Not Delete It.

--Helloiamawesomeandyouarenot Or Trentgreen1022 May 27th 2012 3:32 PM  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helloiamawesomeandyouarenot (talk • contribs) 20:31, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thanks ST! :) Have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sipooti (talk • contribs) 22:38, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Ref Problem
Hi SwisterTwister

I have removed a ref tag from one of the posts on this talk page to you which was from "Chrisandbev" which caused four new messages to be hidden from your view.

also apologies if this is interfering but seeing how popular you are with new editors it seemed to be the right thing to do and i will not take as offence if you undo my change.

Thanks

Gavbadger (talk) 23:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar
Thanks! -- Mark91  it's my world   23:16, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Adoption
Hello, I am a new Wikipedia User and I would like to be adopted. Do you mind helping me along the way and adopting me.

Thanks, CoolStoryBroNeedsMoreDragons (talk) 05:29, 28 May 2012 (UTC)CoolStoryBroNeedsMoreDragonsCoolStoryBroNeedsMoreDragons (talk) 05:29, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Help please!
Im sorry ST, I really need your help. I have written to the person who tagged my article for speedy deletion Not the one you did - this is a 2nd one)re : Tonga National Tag Team. I re wrote the article. And everything is within the guidelines?? The person who deleted it - noted Tag20 was not a sport?? Perhaps he/she should do their re-search. and also said my article is about a club?? ITs info about a Dam NATIONAL Sport and Team - There hundreds of them in here?? Sorry Im airing out - cos I spent alot of time on it and now Ive lost all the work!

Can you help me please.

Sipooti 09:55, 28 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sipooti (talk • contribs)
 * The article was deleted because it was an article about a club that did not credibly indicate the importance/significance of the subject. If you'd like the article back, you can ask Drmies to email it to you, or restore it in your userspace. And he did not say that Tag20 was not a sport, he said "tag20 rugby does not appear to be a notable sport". →B music ian 11:55, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

I re wrote it
Its okay ST - I re wrote it and wrote to the admins.

I just wish some people would be more helpful like you and suggest improvement and suggest newbies how to clean up rather than just tagging to delete :(

THANKS HEAPS!! Sipooti 13:15, 28 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sipooti (talk • contribs)

Thanks for the tips.
Thanks for the tips. Nagas74 (talk) 18:19, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

MTheads
why do you want the MTheads (band)page to be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.82.205.42 (talk) 18:58, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

I never said I wanted to delete the page, I simply added "unsourced" tag and removing the pp and featured articles tags. Pages can only be protected by administrators, pages are also protected when vandalism has ocurred. Consider citing sources for the article, my page for new users User:SwisterTwister/Welcome contains a detailed section how to cite sources. SwisterTwister  talk  19:02, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

defence or defense
--Vanessa1928 (talk) 02:39, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Oh so you didn't spell defense incorrectly. well sorry i said it was spelled wrong could you ever so forgive me???--Vanessa1928 (talk) 02:39, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Dear SwisterTwister, thank you for your kind regards. I will try to do my best. Best wishes,--Maestro Ivanković (talk) 16:53, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Seconded Tmfs10 (talk) 15:47, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your help. I will read it now.

P.S: Can I change my User name?

--Ger salma (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2012 (UTC)Ger Salma

Hi. I see your point about the contact information but how is a more in depth description of a firm’s area of work unnecessary and why would it need a third-party source? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vtlarstudent (talk • contribs) 02:21, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I read your what you do on the adoption thing. Would you please help me. I would love to help with vandalism patrol.

Thanks TurningTables98 (talk) 11:09, 31 May 2012 (UTC)TurningTables98TurningTables98 (talk) 11:09, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Hi :)

Ffyona (talk) 18:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 

Thanks for the help!
Hey, I just wanted to say thanks for the help. I have already started to address some of the issues you brought up, and I am slowly absorbing the many new things necessary to be wiki-saavy.

Don't be afraid to throw more advice my way! I appreciate the guidance.

-Chris Christopher X J. Jensen (talk) 02:00, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I am wondering how to add a photo into and infobox of a person. --TurningTables98 (talk) 02:16, 2 June 2012 (UTC)TurningTable98
 * To add an infobox, you can use one of the templates listed on this page - click on the type of person you're doing an infobox for, then follow the instructions listed on that page. :) Theopolisme   TALK 03:35, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

redirecting a page
hello can you help me redirecting this old article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AJAXFW_For_CodeIgniter to  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJAX_Framework ( it was merged, but was probably done incorrectly)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AjaxBoy (talk • contribs) 09:24, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks like this is done. :) Theopolisme   TALK 06:30, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Edits for my page
Hi SwisterTwister,

Last month you made some suggestions for my page Caitlin Greer. Are these edits that you have completed or that I have to do them on my own? I am very new at this and just a little confused. Thanks for your help.

Chelsea — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chelseamretzloff (talk • contribs) 14:20, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Signing Name
I'm having trouble figuring out how to sign in with my signature after an edit (mainly where to sign). Could you please help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camb42 (talk • contribs) 22:30, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * After writing a comment on a talk page (note: talk page, not just any Wikipedia page that you edit - if you edit a normal Wikipedia page, say for example Apple Inc., you don't need to add a signature), add four tildes ( ~ ) immediately after your comments on that page, like I'm about to do here: :) <font color=#00B74A>Theopolisme  <font color=#37DB79> TALK 03:33, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!
Is there any specific place to put it? --Camb42 (talk) 22:34, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Just directly after what you say, for example, "Blah blah! ~ " :) <font color=#00B74A>Theopolisme  <font color=#37DB79> TALK 05:21, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Promotional
Hey, in situations like this, when you have removed the promotional material, if the users username is the name of the thing they were promoting, report them at WP:UAA. I have reported them for you and apologise if you were in the process of doing this. Cheers! --Chip123456 (talk) 19:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Re
First off, I have to apologize for taking so long to get back to you; I've been spending a lot of time getting the PC RfC stuff nailed down. Anyways, once that's finally done I'd be more than happy to nominate you for adminship. I've seen your work around and you seem like someone who could really use the admin tools. Let me know whenever you want to run and I'll get a statement ready. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 02:29, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

As soon as possible when you're not busy. Thanks, SwisterTwister   talk  03:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

hello
Hi SwisterTwister. Thank you for leaving a message on my Sandbox. To introduce myself, the page I'm working on is IUPAC Polymer Nomenclature. I'm (for my sins ;-) ) a member of the IUPAC Subcommittee on Polymer Terminology, and we've been working on a project for quite a few years now. I got a directive from on high up in the IUPAC board saying to try and get what we have produced so far on this project on to Wiki. I hope that it's useful! Thanks again, all the best, Roger.Rogerchiorns (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Question
Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you for my welcome to Wiki! I am a complete newbie, maybe you could help me with something? I sent the following message to another wiki user but I am unsure if they actually log in regularly.

"Hi Derek. I am new to wikipedia and signed up specifically to edit a page on Danny Bryant as it said "The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for music". I have made edits and think with the correct references etc it should be ok now. I noticed that you first flagged this a while ago. If the article is now ok, how does this notice get removed? Sorry if I am going about this the wrong way, I thought I would ask you as you were the one to flag it - newbie here! Many thanks."

You help would be greatly appreciated but as I said above, I am unsure if this is the correct way to go about enquiring!

Many thanks, --Mirrorballs (talk) 10:40, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: List of Byzantine emperors
I reverted the edit by as the addition didn't make much sense. There was a stray sentence about Spain's bond auctions and the dates added to the table didn't make any sense. Emperor from 1453 to 1923? I don't think so. The revert cleared up the table formatting. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:11, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Re your message: No, I don't think so. The Byzantine Empire ended a very long time ago. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Thnx
Sure I will. Jyoti Prakash Nath (talk) 07:02, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanx again Devid for ur support, I am editing Assamese Wiki. Jyoti Prakash Nath (talk) 07:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Kodanad wikifying
Hello, You recently did a Wikifying on article titled Kodanad (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kodanad) and I find few of the sections removed. Could you please let me know whether this was intentional or not. Thanks Rms77 (talk) 22:28, 7 June 2012 (UTC) Hi, Kodanad is mainly a elephant training centre that offers various elephant related activities to its visitors. Hence there was a section, 'activities with elephants', which now seems to have got removed after your wikification. Could you please revert back, I think it is relevant to the article itself. Re: referencing/citation, this could be added. Rms77 (talk) 00:11, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Did I do something wrong?
Hi, I just noticed you left me a message on my Talk page with suggestion on how to sign comments and make a summary on edits... was that just a standard message, or was that your way to "nudge" me because of something I did wrong? I was under the impression I signed all my comments so far, and filled in the details of my (few) edits Raven-14 (talk) 01:19, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

pleas tell me the reasons for taging my page on austinjames lindsay

Thank you
thanks for the welcome!

I am trying to find English language sources for the edits I have made.

Help would be great
I just added more to my Wikipedia article. I am glad that you are interested. I would appreciate the help. Thank you for offering.

Zuhair mehdi
At User talk:Zuhairmehdi, : However, over at Zuhair mehdi, it appears that you only instead of moving it. Can you handle it from here? <span style='font:1.0em "Apple Garamond","Adobe Garamond Pro",Garamond,serif;color:#369;'>Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 06:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Carla Diaz
The talk page was deleted when the page was a redirect. Redirects don't have talk pages. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:39, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Help needed to clear the Feedback Dashboard queue
Hi SwisterTwister, a project has been constructed and Maryana (WMF) was wondering if you'd be able to help out with a research project her colleagues are running on the effects of MoodBar/Feedback Dashboard. They're trying to see if getting a response to MoodBar feedback helps newbies edit more – but to do that, they need to (temporarily) raise the level of responses to as close to 100% as possible. (Don't worry; it's only a week-long test.) If you could help me and her spread the word among the other FD top responders you know to help us clear the backlog by June 19th, that would be awesome! More details about this test are on this page on Meta. Let her know if you have any questions and feel free to get in touch with other FD leaders about this if you want :) Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 23:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Riley beat me here! No wonder he's at the top of the FD leaderboard :)


 * In addition to the above request, I also wanted to say thank you for tracking down and barnstarring awesome new-ish editors. I've been giving out barnstars to every English Wikipedian who makes his/her 1,000th edit to articles, and I've noticed several times that you'd already left a nice, encouraging barnstar on their talk pages. Thanks for helping spread the wikilove, David! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Help!
Hi David

Thanks for your welcome. I am having a problem over the lead of the Sigmund Freud Wikipedia page and could use your advice about how to proceed since I am relatively new to Wikipedia. I have read a lot of Freud's work and a lot about Freud so I checked out the page. Freud's ideas have many adherents and many harsh critics, so I knew if I made edits I would have to respect the existence of the controversy. I have encountered a very aggressive editor over there who has written a lead to the Freud article that contained numerous references to the criticisms of psychoanalysis, but not a word from its adherents. It isn't an accurate reflection of the controversy, a controversy which is more justly reflected in the "Science" section in the body of the article (at least it was when I was last there!).

I made a bold edit, had them all reverted by said editor, and apologized for my excessive ambition in changing so much of the lead. At first, I thought I had actually offended the guy and I could assuage hurt feelings. I wanted to proceed toward compromise and consensus in good faith. I scaled back my goal from rewriting the lead or reverting it to an earlier version and decided to just try to make it a bit more balanced. In the Talk pages, I explained my thinking in terms I thought were polite, and I proposed a number of small changes that left the majority of his lead intact. He rejected them all with much hostility, and it was clear my attempt at courtesy and mutual respect for differing views was not going to be reciprocated. The Talk pages show all this quite clearly, despite his repeated attempts to mischaracterize what I said and did.

Mainly, I wanted to add in a comment from a reputable source into the lead to balance the criticisms with a view of Freud's importance to psychiatry. I added: "Renowned neuroscientist and Nobel laureate Eric Kandel wrote at the end of the twentieth century that 'psychoanalysis still represents the most coherent and intellectually satisfying view of the mind.' " Ref: Kandel ER., “Biology and the future of psychoanalysis: a new intellectual framework for psychiatry revisited.” American Journal of Psychiatry 1999; 156(4):505-24. In addition to winning a Nobel in neuroscience, Kandel is also the author of the main neuroscience textbook used in medical schools for the last several decades (I am an M.D., though I didn't mention that on the Talk pages). Kandel might be THE leading figure in neuroscience. His views, published in a well-known 1999 review in the American Journal of Psychiatry, merited citation I thought. I invited my opponent to add more criticism in there if he wanted to, but he preferred edit war--which he seems very much to enjoy!

I looked at this user's user page and he lists on it numerous articles he has created that rely exclusively on sources that roundly disparage Freud, his ideas, biographies of Freud, and anybody who dares to find value in his work. This includes Peter Gay's biography which was praised by the New York Times and Chicago Tribune as a masterpiece; Gay also won a National Book Award, though for a different book. Yet this editor does not mention any of that but just arranges his sources to lambast Freud at every opportunity. I believe this editor has made the Wikipedia entry on a very important figure very much biased, warped, and inaccurate. I think that is unfortunate because I am in agreement with Kandel that there are some very important ideas Freud had. Both Einstein and Carl Sagan felt that Freudian insight into the lies we tell ourselves is even of great political importance. Meanwhile, the "Freud Is Dead" / "Freud Is Not Dead" wars have been going on for a hundred years now, but this other editor does not acknowledge his partisanship and is determined to ban anything positive about Freud from the Freud page. The page used to be better, I seem to recall. I noticed that it's no longer rated a "good" page, and with good reason.

Is there a way to defend the page from this editor? He has ample opportunity to vent his spleen in veiled form and quote all the Freud-bashers he wants in the many other pages he's created, but people who know and value Freud's work ought to have a say in characterizing Freud as well, no? I notice that Creationists are not allowed to deface the Darwin page in this way.

Thanks sincerely for any help you have to offer.

Hypoplectrus (talk) 05:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I respectfully suggest that editors interested in this dispute take a careful look through the revision history of Sigmund Freud instead of simply taking Hypoplectrus' claims at face value. It is not true that the lead only mentioned criticisms of Freud - it noted that some researchers believe there is evidence supporting some of his theories. Despite Hypoplectrus' claim that the lead suggested that Freud wasn't important to psychiatry, the fact is that the lead didn't even mention psychiatry, and as such suggested nothing about whether Freud was important to it or not. Hypoplectrus seems stuck on getting the Kandel quote in the lead. I've tried to explain that Kandel is simply one person to have expressed opinions about Freud's legacy, and that there's nothing that makes Kandel more important to Freud than many others, but he won't listen. I have nothing to say in response to Hypoplectrus' other comments, since they aren't relevant to this issue. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 06:47, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Can you review my page?
Hi! I've created a page 'India HIV/AIDS Alliance' and it was correctly spotted as not containing references or inline citations. Since then I've inserted references and citations and will continue to do so. However, i'm confused about the steps I should take now. Do I wait for people to respond to the new references and citations or do I contact someone specifically (someone like yourself :)? Apologies if this question is too basic to mention here but I thought you'd be a great resource for this.

Thanks for your time.

182.68.246.201 (talk) 17:24, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Muna — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muna2012 (talk • contribs) 09:39, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Question
Hi! I just put an article up for tuned anvils but it says I don't have references, and I do. This may have been flagged from before and not removed I guess. Although I'm not sure. I personally interviewed the owner about them, Emil Richards and have the info on my website, which I referenced. Your help is appreciated! thanks! --Xylosmygame (talk) 21:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you mean Tuned Anvils? Are you --UnQuébécois (talk) 22:17, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes but I ditched that username because it said I couldn't use it since it's my company, which is fine. Point is that I am a professional percussionist and am an expert in this field, and I interviewed Emil Richards about his collection personally, with his knowing about this use for wikipedia to keep track of the history of these instruments. I went back in and edited it with my new username and it was still showing up like that. I see it's gone now... now it just says that other message about "may rely too heavily on sources with too close a tie to the subject" which is just not the case but whatever I suppose...--Xylosmygame (talk) 22:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

I changed the unsourced tag to third-party because the article needs third-party sources. Third-party sources such as news coverage. SwisterTwister  talk  22:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC) The question remains about how to reference a website. Is what I did not sufficient?--Xylosmygame (talk) 22:40, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Is this how I reference a website page? That is inline, correct? This is to have it show text of "here's this fact" (and it's referenced with a little number next to it). BUT, what about at the end? Do I need to list references again? Or do I just have

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clara Amfo
This page is a mess, but it appears the subject is notable. Bearian (talk) 19:25, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I think otherwise, and made a rather long comment. I doubt it would pass AfD, even after extensive rewriting.  DGG ( talk ) 00:28, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Very well, I mentioned it seemed she was more regionally notable anyway. It seems she at least got a more noticeable position having hosting her own show now. Now as for Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Icehockeyinharlem? SwisterTwister   talk  03:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Both these are borderline. This has the added problem of having major news attention it might not otherwise have because of being in NYC. I've seen a few other similar articles on youth athletic organizations, and I don;t like turn them down, on the one hand, or to certify them as being OK on the other. At AfC I usually just pass on these, which at the present gives about a 50% chance of their getting sensible attention.  But when we consult, even if I  were rash enough to say we are  taken together the most generally knowledgable people at WP,  I don't like the position of one or two people being the arbiters of notability in borderline cases over such a wide field; both these are borderline, & if they were articles at AfD I'd let others discuss them.  Perhaps the only fair way to do it is to revise them both as best we can, then accept them, and ourselves take them to AfD saying we want a community opinion. There ought to be a better way, but i for the moment can;t think of one.  DGG ( talk ) 04:30, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Atiya (2)


Hello SwisterTwister. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Atiya (2)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Answer to Edit Law Society of Ireland page
Hi, I saw your note in November and was wondering if you are going to update the Law Society page? I can supply more images - is there anything else I can do? Thanks FriendlyuserCP (talk) 17:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I've been busy in real life but I promise I will review it and add some of the information by the end of the week. Thanks! SwisterTwister   talk  19:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=586284202 your edit] to Jeff Kashiwa may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:23, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Jeff Kashiwa born 1963, Louisville, Kentucky is a jazz saxophonist native to Seattle {{cite web|

Resubmission of Hubbell Page
Hi SwisterTwister, thank you for your input and edits on Wikipedia. You recently declined my article stating it may be notable but needs more sources and to give you notice when I have made changes. I have added a few more sources that I hope will suffice. Thanks again for your help, it's much appreciated! Carrierc (talk) 18:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Delete call on Agoda.com AFD discussion
Hi there. I don't understand your call to delete the Agoda.com page. The reasons you stated on the AFD discussion are not aligned with the reasons for deletion according to Deletion policy. Could you kindly elaborate further? Agoda.com is a household name in Southeast Asia, used by tens of thousands of people every day. Such a service warrants an encyclopedic entry. Please feel free to discuss the points I had stated on the AFD discussion. Thank you! Asheshong (talk) 03:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Add AdF to WikiProject Classical music
Hi there. Could you please help me to add Articles for deletion/George Jackson (conductor) (2nd nomination) to WikiProject Classical music? Thank you!--Karljoos (talk) 14:19, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Nucleus page Nomination
Hello SwisterTwister I dont understand on what basis u have added a deletion nomination to the page Nucleus Premium Properties Private ltd. Nucleus is a very famous builder in South India and has got lot of newslinks associated with them and prominent name in Construction Industry. May i know what are the flaws in the page.

Thanks. Hello SwisterTwister I am confused as to why my submission Mike Stanley Filmmaker was declined. You note that it should have news and magazine coverage. This article does have news and magazine coverage. There was reference made to a Fox 2 News interview and a Best Picture show interview. As for magazine coverage there is mention of three magazines in references, Cinemagic, Fangoria and B's Nest. B's Nest contains an interview with Mr. Stanley. These were all obtained from an archive page which also contains news articles on Mr. Stanley for a span of a period of nine years at:  http://filmlabshowcase.wix.com/filmlab#!news-articles/c14xp I have also included more recent web posts on Mr. Stanley. His career spans 30 years. I believe there is more than enough to show he is notable. Thank you. Indiefanatic Indiefanatic (talk) 18:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes but it will need better coverage (to at least satisfy WP:GNG) as I mentioned at the draft page. SwisterTwister   talk  19:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello SwisterTwister

Edit Law Society of Ireland page
Hi again. Sorry to bother you but you mentioned on 10th December that you might be able to help to improve the Law Society of Ireland page? If you are semi-retired would you still have the time or would you prefer to recommend another editor? Thanks. FriendlyuserCP (talk) 17:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC))
 * Yes, I'm sorry but I don't think I'll be able to help you as I lost interest in the Law Society of Ireland. May I suggest asking someone with more expertise on this subject at WikiProject Ireland? Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  04:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

AfD - London Real TV
Not sure why there's an AfD happening on the article I've just made. Considering it's my first article in Wikipidea, would you help me navigate me through this and lessen the chances it would be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theamotimes (talk • contribs) 19:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Responded at deletion nomination. SwisterTwister   talk  04:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clara Amfo


Hello SwisterTwister. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Clara Amfo".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Bearian (talk) 21:29, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chuck Loeb, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hitch, The Untouchables and Jim Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arthur Hammerstein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Dear SwisterTwister, I would like to let you know that the business bodies give awards to the company not to the person. Thats why same I wrote in the write-up.please guide.--Zainkazmi1 (talk) 19:46, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Icehockeyinharlem concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Icehockeyinharlem, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Icehockeyinharlem


Hello SwisterTwister. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Icehockeyinharlem".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello SwisterTwister. You recently tagged a page that I have been trying to create as potentially self-promoting. It was the page David Rubenstein (attorney). If you don't mind, could you give me a few suggestions on how to make this article less subject to deletion? I am new to wikipedia, so I am unsure of exactly how many sources/what tone of language I need to be using to avoid these issues. Thank you in advance for your help. Theharrybell (talk) 17:00, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * No problem! I have a page for newcomers here that has some useful information as well as other pages New contributors' help page. If you're sure you can rewrite the article, you can ask the deleting admin, User:RHaworth, to restore it. Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  03:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Webster quote
You mention the following quote: Wisdom begins at the end - Daniel Webster. Where and when did he say it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nelson4P (talk • contribs) 21:32, 18 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Well, I don't know about when but you can find it anywhere such as Google Books but I particularly found it at BrainyQuote.com. SwisterTwister   talk  03:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Regarding speedy deletion nomination on 1oth September:
Hello SwisterTwister, This is Maruf. I just got a notification for speedy deletion for some reason. I am entirely a new user and is not understanding the cause of this alert. I have already read the general criteria for speedy deletion and spam but it is still not clear to me which words, links or point I need to delete. I had no intention of ambiguous promotion of my company. I am just putting my company's info in Wikipedia and want to be listed by it. If you please see my writing again, be more precise about my faults and suggest me what should I change, it would be so kind of you.

I look forward to your quick reply.

Thanks! Maruf A. (talk) 06:11, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

AFCH script
As you're using the old version of the AFCH script, please take a look at this discussion and the question (poll) raised below it.
 * Reference:  Draft:Nyrius‎; 2014-09-12 22:30:03 . . (+161)‎ . . ‎SwisterTwister (Talk | contribs)‎ (Commenting on Wikipedia:Articles for creation submission (AFCH))

--Gryllida (talk) 11:04, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Regarding speedy deletion nomination for JAFRA Cosmetics
Hello SwisterTwister, I'm new to Wikipedia and would like a chance to rewrite my article about JAFRA Cosmetics. I did not mean to create the article as promotional material and was only hoping to create a Wikipedia entry for the company. I have revised my references and edited the text to conform to the NPOV. Please let me know if it's possible to restore the page. Thanks! - Eternalstyle (talk) 18:56, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you want to recreate the article, you'll need to show it's notable meaning it has received significant third-party coverage from newspapers and magazines that talk about the company in-depth. Also, details such as the mission statement, usage of "we", "our" and "us" may be appropriate on the company's own website but not here as that sounds promotional and suggests ownership. Rather than adding it yourself, consider using Articles for creation where a user such as myself can review it beforehand. Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  04:48, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Back in September
You asked me about the removal of some material you added to Tajja Isen. In general I don't really like too much family background here except for figures of historical importance, but the exception is when it's relevant, but the musical family background of a musician is relevant. I'm not sure the no. of siblings etc. But the amount you had there is usually within the amount that is always OK.  DGG ( talk ) 18:47, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!!!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:green; background-color:white; font color:red; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

E-e-bayer_lover  (talk)  is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. And remember to keep the CHRIST in CHRISTmas! E-e-bayer_lover  (talk)  22:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Re Edith Hirsch
Hi--yes, I believe notability is shown. An obituary in the NY Times, like one of my main sources, has been shown in a few AfDs to be a pretty good indicator of notability. Also, the multiple mentions in RS newspapers count, I think. But thanks for getting back to me so quickly! Origamiteⓣⓒ 05:44, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:NPEOPLE: Multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability, which I did somewhat in the "Published" section. However, if you don't think that's right, it's my first article, which is why I put it up at AfC, even after 3,000 edits. Origamiteⓣⓒ 05:47, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I highly agree but I don't see much of a solid article with that information. If she had participated in a highly reported incident or other news-worthy event or won any notable awards, that would be something different. Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  05:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

IVANCARDOSO (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Hello SwisterTwister, thanks for your time. I didn´t understand the last part of the message you left me after the revision of the page I´ve created callled The Berimbot. The part I didn´t understand is - this article would be better mentioned under the lab's article or something else relevant.  What do you mean by that? This is my first article and everything here is new to me. Thanks a lot.

Request on 16:47:43, 29 March 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by 137aes
I guess I'm confused regarding my references. The references listed are reputable in the virtual reality world, just like Road & Track would be for cars. I agree that the article could be longer. As far as the significance of the Infinadeck, I assume you may not be familiar with locomotion in the virtual world. There are two products currently out there, e.g. the Virtuix Omni, but none are mechanical. That is what makes the Infinadeck notable. Any direction would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

137aes (talk) 16:47, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

IVANCARDOSO (talk) 06:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Dear SwisterTwister, please check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haile_(robot)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Electronic_Musical_Urban_Robots

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kismet_(robot)

IVANCARDOSO (talk) 13:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Dear SwisterTwister researching the Wikipedia, I found a category called Artistic and performing robots, some of them are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haile_(robot)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Electronic_Musical_Urban_Robots

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kismet_(robot)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Cuco_El_Guapo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karakuri_puppet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titan_the_Robot

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Partner_Robot

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trons

I sent some of those links before, but the list now is more complete. There are many robots with a profile very similar or equal to the Berimbot, could you please advise what specific informations should I collect to improve the notability of my project? This is my first profile and everything is new to me. I thank you in advance.

Regarding New Article "Yasmina" by Yasmina Fan
Hello Swister twister,thanks for reviewing my article. I reviewed Criteria for Musicians Notability on this link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music) Parts which I think are enough for Notability. -point number 4 in Notability was "Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country". I have added references that mentioned Yasmina's participation in many national concerts in Egypt. -point number 6 was " is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles " I have added references that mentioned Yasmina has been a member of 2 known Ensembles in Egypt.-point number 8 is "Has won or been nominated for a major music award" Yasmina received a music award from Egyptian Minister of Culture,is this prize not major enough? -point number 9 was "Has won or placed in a major music competition." Yasmina has participated in Arabs got talent Competition, while this competition is not only for musicians , its probably the biggest "Got Talent" spin off as it includes participants from 22 countries , and Yasmina was the only singer or musician to reach the final , effectively beating all others including Nadia Azzi who already has a wikipedia page. -point number 10 was "Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show" I put link to her performances in 2 TV shows (She performed 3 songs in each show). Please give me feedback are all these points not enough for Notability ? Thanks.

Thanks for your time Link for edited article draft : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Yasmina —

Request on 16:34:59, 4 April 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Rtwhite
Thanks for your comments.

As far as I can see Friday Brown does meets the music 'notability' requirements of Wikipedia by winning international singing competitions and her television work: I’ve also indicated the period over which she was active. I used the phrase 'Friday Brown is' because she's still alive, rather than active. I suppose saying 'popular music singer-songwriter' could be confusing, but that was the arena in which she worked, popular music. It wasn’t intended to indicate her degree of popularity.

Any advice would be much appreciated.

Many thanks,

Ray.Rtwhite (talk) 16:34, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Rtwhite (talk) 16:34, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello SwisterTwister,

I am trying to figure out why this would be marked for deletion. In all things new such as the speed for technology today we will see changes in traditional concepts and new ones evolving.

The internet-of-things will impact and change business models and one of the most important going forward will be protecting digital data assets. Traditional recordkeeping and library, archive methodologies for 'preservation' do not cater and will not be suitable for digital data asset management. Whilst the concept and term of digital perpetuation is only just evolving one could same the same for a lot of new terms. Why is it that you have such a problem with this word and its objective for differentiation and clarification.

Even if you delete this the term will not go away. It is already out there in publication on professional website libraries and will be available in the Queensland archives shortly. Therefore whilst it is not prominent now like all new evolutions so is there the introduction to new terms of reference it takes time and one would had thought that the wikipedia was a progressive environment and keen to be seen to staying in touch technology and the changing global environment.

Thank you for your time. Linda Shave — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.173.192.215 (talk) 07:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Regarding deletion of Al Wathba
Hello, How are you ? First of all thanku for reviewing my 1st wiki post.

You nominated my post to be deleted as there is some "lawsuit" filed against it. I reviewed the article and i couldn't able to find anything against al wathba. I have copied Conclusion of the post for the reference "This case is an example of the difficulties that can arise in the absence of clear drafting. while courts are always keen to give effect to the intentions of the parties to a freely negotiated contract, this is only possible where those intentions are made plain. Those clauses that are commonly considered ‘boilerplate’ (such as the ‘law and jurisdiction’ clause), are of essential importance when disputes arise and inserting plain, unambiguous wording must not be overlooked at the drafting stage."

The Egyptian ship owner want to seek the justice outside the UAE law & order and It is clearly stated in all insurance documents that all the law and order are subjected to UAE court only.

And this article is helping the user that everybody should read and agree all the terms and conditions before going for any insurance.

This type of small court case for such a big insurance company is not a big issues.

Please review the article and advise me corrections so that newbies like me will also become contributor to wiki.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iloveabudhabi (talk • contribs) 12:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

REQUEST FOR RE-REVIEW
Hello SwisterTwister. I'm respectfully requesting that you have another look at your vote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Goldsboro_Web_Development

Being as I have provided independent, accredited university citations stating our software was the best available. Under Wikipedia guidelines this is noteworthy citation.

Leewells2000 (talk) 14:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

G11 AfCs
I altogether agree with what you are doing in tagging these afcs as G11, instead of starting a hopeless reviewing process--I think that's the way to handle it, andwish more people would do it the way you are.  DGG ( talk ) 02:41, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

20:04:08, 30 May 2015 review of submission by 2602:30A:C0F6:2280:E45E:DC0B:C5DF:2F9A
Hello, I am one of Mr. Lantz's professors from Ghidotti Early College High School and I was wondering what your best advice would be on where to look for more notable sources. Mr. Lantz is graduating high school this year and I thought it was so rare for someone of his age, being only 17, to receive not just one college degree but two before finishing high school. Not to mention the fact he has 75 college credits completed already. I understand notability is of huge importance to Wikipedia, so if this continues to be a concern for him having his own article, would there be any chance he could merge into another page, like that of Dual enrollment. After all the volunteer work and service he has done for the school, we all wanted to give something back to him before he heads off to college, and he had always dreamed of having a Wikipedia article of his own. Thank you so much for your time and feedback. It is greatly appreciated.

2602:30A:C0F6:2280:E45E:DC0B:C5DF:2F9A (talk) 20:04, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, aside from starring in one documentary and receiving two diplomas before high school (I'm not sure if anyone has else accomplished this) there's not much notability and the article could seem promotional because of that. News coverage is always good and if it's in-depth that's even better. He could be mentioned at another article if it's outstanding such as if he is the only one to ever receive diplomas before high school. If there was an article for the documentary, he could be mentioned there but I'm not sure how significant his role in that was. If not, I'm afraid there's nothing to suggest mentioning him. Considering his young age, this also affects the low amount of good sources. Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  23:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

shimlahills page removal
Hi there,

i would like to know why you have highlighted my page as for deletion

Please guide what to do

i even can see other company page in wiki

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TaxiForSure see this one — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shimlahills (talk • contribs) 06:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

05:22:41, 6 June 2015 review of submission by 2602:304:68C7:78B0:F136:3C99:4981:8737
I am not certain why the amount of sources or their notability is an issue in the article I wrote. According to Wikipedia's guidelines on notability "Sources used to support a claim of notability include independent, reliable publications in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations[3] except for the following"

Two of my sources are from highly regarded newspapers and the third is a CNN interview which is a national coverage. If you could please explain what makes these 3 sources not notable enough I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you.

2602:304:68C7:78B0:F136:3C99:4981:8737 (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * It's a good article but other people may question if the subject is notable from those three sources. If they are other good sources, it would be good to add them. Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  15:49, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

No Man's Land (2013 British film)
Hi there, you had mentioned in this discussion that this film's notability is suspect. The page is now orphaned (and essentially unreferenced). I'm wondering if you think it should be listed at AFD? Timmyshin (talk) 03:37, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Autopatrolled?
Is there any particular reason you do not have the autopatrolled user right? VQuakr (talk) 06:20, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I've never requested it and no has ever given it to me themselves but I think I'll start using it. Would you mind adding autopatrolled to my tools? Thanks!  SwisterTwister   talk  04:34, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Re your message: Done. I don't normally assign permissions (you're the first one I've granted permissions to versus removing them), so don't make me look bad. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:35, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

New page patrol
When you tag a new page for deletion or cleanup, make sure it's been mark as patrolled. Thanks. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 05:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, I missed that one. SwisterTwister   talk  05:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello SwisterTwister,

I have submitted, and was denied, a page for Freedom Network USA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Freedom_Network_USA. This message is in response to your comment on the submission: The article contains too many primary links and thus needs more third-party sources like good news coverage.

I do want to thank you for your time in reviewing my submission. As I am completely new to this process, I would love to get your feedback as far as how I can improve the submission to wikipedia standards. This organization is doing great, reputable work in the field of human trafficking, and it would be great to have wikipedia representation.

I felt I followed the guideline regarding 'notability' by providing sources that adhere to: "reliable sources independent of the organization have discussed it." These sites include:

whitehouse.gov, which is the official governmental website of The White House and President Barack Obama of the United States

The United States Department of Justice website at, source content mentioned at: http://www.justice.gov/usao/nye/pr/2013/2013sep20.html

The submission contains 23 third-party resources, while supplementing with 10 resources directly from Freedom Network regarding Leadership and internal processes. How many third-party references are typically required to consider the evidence as sufficient? It is an option to remove all internal resources and only provide third-party if necessary. Is there a golden ratio to strive for?

Organizations used as reference including CAST LA and CIW have been existence for many years and have received great notability in the United States and globally. Both CAST LA and CIW are member organizations of Freedom Network USA.

CAST LA was honored by The United Nations, as evidenced here and in the submission. CIW was recognized with the 2014 Clinton Global Citizen Award, and the 2015 Presidential Medal.

I am providing this additional information because I want to inquire about how to provide more reputable resources to represent the success and notability of the Freedom Network USA. If you have suggestions, I would greatly appreciate any help and assistance!

Thank you for your time and consideration,

Luz

Luz2102 (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 * Thanks! I wouldn't mind some help with the back pages of NPP (trying to review as many as I can). SwisterTwister   talk  21:38, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Hi, there. I see the note you put on the International Children's Fund. I am a little confused by this as I have found third-party sources in the references. It's a small charity, so there is a not a lot written about it, but I do have a fair number of references for it. If you could elaborate on what you think it needs, I would be happy to try and improve it. Thanks! CdbgLaurie (talk) 15:38, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Dan Morrell entry
Dear SwisterTwister.

I am having difficulty understanding why you rejected my submitted biographical entry for Dan Morrell. There are numerous links to other websites and references to highly reputable third-party sources. Dan Morrell is clearly a notable figure, being a leading and active pioneer in several notable areas of current interest and the person who coined the term 'carbon neutral', one of the most significant terms of the age. He is also the subject of a forthcoming biography by the well-known writer/journalist Rosie Boycott. This very night CHANT Live, the band he started with the famous record producer Martin Glover are playing in front of an expected 30,000 crowd at Stonehenge. So I would be very grateful if you could point out the problems to help me get it right. I offered to get this organised for Dan, so I find myself in a tricky situation.

Thank you and best wishes,

Guy Ogilvy

Guy Ogilvy (talk) 07:20, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

XARA
as you requested - added references for notability

Draft: Ciklum
Hello Swister twister, thanks for reviewing my article ( Draft:Ciklum). I provided more information in reference citations with more credible sources ( FDiIntelligence / Financial Times article, etc.), and updated Infobox company. Please let me know if this works better. Nikols70 (talk) 08:26, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Live ‘n Wild, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Question posted at the discussion for you. North America1000 03:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Navjit Buttar
What's problem there sir i can help you cuz i was know navjit buttar cuz i'm also from punjab so tell me what i have to do — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.253.25.191 (talk) 09:38, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

09:50:14, 24 June 2015 review of submission by Zuto-Zuto
Hi I have listened to your request and add a lot more references. Would you be able to review it for me please? Thanks Zuto-Zuto (talk) 09:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

page
Hi Pls can you tell me which parts i need to remove because all things is included contain with useful information regarding online food. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mealvilla (talk • contribs) 05:41, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * - If you're thinking of submitting that as an article, it can't be accepted as it sounds too promotional and would not elaborate the notability. To learn more about editing, see New contributors' help page and User:SwisterTwister/Welcome. SwisterTwister   talk  06:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Re: User:Yash~enwiki
Re your message: Done. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:29, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks very much, I've seen you around too. Happy editing! SwisterTwister   talk  05:06, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Another AFD that may interest you
If that AFD on Félix Malpica Valverde interested you, I have two more AFDs on Mexican radio that have not received any response: Articles for deletion/Stereo Hits and Articles for deletion/Grupo FM. Raymie (t • c) 20:45, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carrie Judd Montgomery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopalian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
North America1000 00:28, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Tryad Entry
. greetings !

thanks for your work with wikipedia.

wanted to let you know that tryad's album 'listen' was the first independent apple itunes lp release and gathered some press as a result. :.

http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/listen_by_tryad_first_non-apple_itunes_lp_release/

in addition, i was interviewed on the 'music manumit' podcast regarding our open creative commons musical creation process. :.

http://www.musicmanumit.com/2013/07/tryad-130714-music-manumit-podcast.html

please consider allowing the tryad entry to remain. we have many growing fans around the world. our music has broadcast on a number of television networks including pbs and cnn. :.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldtluH3-Afs

thanks for your time *

Vavrek (talk) 06:01, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Captain Planet
Template:Captain Planet has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Godsy (TALK<sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;"> CONT ) 00:14, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Explanation requested to your revert
Hi I see youve reverted sourced references to the article on Seeman can you please explain why?
 * Because I'm not sure why it needs so many references for that particular area and per the lengthy talk at the talk page. SwisterTwister   talk  20:25, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your response, I collected many references precisely because I expected trouble: even with so many references given why is there still any ambiguity wrt the person's name? Why are edits reverting the persons first name being allowed and why arent THOSE edits being considered vandalism? Given youve also read through the talk page, do you buy the arguments supporting the case for removing the persons first name? Do you believe so many sources made the same "printing mistake" and expect a passport/birth certificate to substantiate the first name? Thanks once again for responding.
 * I'd take whatever looks most sensible. SwisterTwister   talk  21:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Good. I am interested in having a honest discussion with a neutral entity here and I am glad if I can take this up with you. Can you please list what was your deciding factor in concluding that the person's first name is ambiguous? If the different sources dont seem to convince you, what did you find about the argument against the given name in the talk page that convinced you? You obviously cant find the printing mistake theory sensible. If your argument is to go by most common usage, I agree partially, the first name need not be mentioned everywhere, but has to be mentioned in wiki as adding it makes the article more comprehensive. The sources listing the first name has to be done justice for. Can I list this under "Birth/Other names"?
 * About your last paragraph, yes. SwisterTwister   talk  23:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

I am thankful for your reasonable response. I will add this name in the Born section of the article. But, I believe this will not be over, there will be comebacks but I am sure you will be as vigilant with them as you were with me.

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Ellie Greenwich
 * added a link pointing to Johnny Ray


 * Lyle Ashton Harris
 * added a link pointing to University of New York

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Pahal (scheme), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:02, 14 July 2015 (UTC) A tag has been placed on your user page, User talk:Nizam Matches Private Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dawn Bard (talk) 14:15, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks...
for patrolling so much of my contributions!! --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 18:22, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

 * I thought so as well. Although it might be time to remove the wiki-vacation notice as you seem like a active editor! Liz  <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;"><b style="color:#006400;">Read!</b> <b style="color:#006400;">Talk!</b> 23:10, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello Sir Thank you for your suggestion and warm welcome for the page Industrial Robotics Training Centre (AKGEC-KUKA)! I will be implementing your suggestions soon. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acaditi (talk • contribs) 06:39, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Upper Tamakoshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dolakha. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Rushing to AFD
I urge you, in all sincerity, to slow down and spend a little more time on WP:BEFORE. With something like Abdulla al-Hadj, rushing to AFD after searching for a transliterated name under the particular spelling that happened to appear on the page was, well...  Just please slow down and try a few variant searches when dealing with long-standing, or even with new articles that have at least one source and are prima facie plausible. But especially wnen dealing with names that are transliterated from another alphabet. If I sound exasperated, it is because I can see that you do constant, thankless, yoeman's labor bringing a lot of bad, mostly new articles to AFD. But I also spend a lot of time checking assertions you make about lack of sources that turn out to have merely been careless searches. Maybe try just tagging for notability sometimes, especially when working in unfamiliar territory. E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:04, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I hear you but I often like other users will nominate it because it's still a concern and others may have better access to sourcing past my abilities (foreign language, offline, etc.). I often consider opening an RfC but think AfD may be a better option sometimes if it seems too troubling. It's worth noting I'll try and improve the article as much as I can like you and also tag it as needed. Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  19:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Colin Moriarty
The "Vita Fetish" thing are trolls regarding an article he wrote years ago saying that the PlayStation Vita would be a success. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Arcata Community Recycling Center
I was wondering if you might take a look at current state of the article with a view to withdrawing your AfD nomination. Thanks. —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 20:16, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

afds
Ivery much appreciate your notices. I no longer can keep track myself of the daily list, the way I once used to, but I'll always try to comment on something where there have been insufficient comments (except in popular music and sport, where any comments of mine may produce more confusion than assistance).  DGG ( talk ) 08:16, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Belo Platno
Hello, there are three brand new in-line references in Belo Platno article. Please, check if it is OK now. (And have a nice day.) --Stripar (talk) 09:23, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

RFA
Hello SwisterTwister, I have noticed your edit count of 54,000+ contribs and your activity on AFD. Have you considered to request for adminship? I am more than welcome to nominate you if you wish. <em style='font-family:Forte;color:#FF3300'>Racer <em style="font-family:Calibri;color: #355E3B">-Ωmegα  03:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I had in 2012 (see Requests for adminship/SwisterTwister) and it was not a good experience (partly what caused a wikibreak). Thanks but no thanks at least for now (I've found it to be a little too stressful). Cheers! :) SwisterTwister   talk  05:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Tom Morris. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Khaireni, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Assessing copyright
Hello. :) In reviewing listings at WP:SCV, I see that you removed a CSB notice from Green Party of Malaysia with a note that "Nothing blatant here."

I'm afraid you may have overlooked the issue, as content I just removed from the article was copied verbatim from the source. For a particularly egregious example:

While I can't be sure how this was overlooked, I wonder if you are relying on the bots that compare text? In this case, the bots could not function properly on the page and so could not help in identifying the issue. In such situations, we have to do a visual comparison. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * In this case, I simply looked at the report. Often, I'll also watch the article for any improvement or changes. SwisterTwister   talk  17:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Related to this, I don't really understand this removal. Fortunately, this copyright problem was reparable (and I have now repaired it), whereas the other simply required removal of copied content. Can you explain what you meant? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:09, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, I first looked at the Duplicator Report (which has been extremely slow loading) and looking at the lycaeum website, it seems to have a Wiki format but I'm not sure if it is a Wiki website (searches find zero results). SwisterTwister   talk  17:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That the site looks like a wiki doesn't help avoid it being a blatant copyright issue, I'm afraid; there are many wikis which are not compatibly licensed with ours. It's a good idea to look at the talk page when evaluating these things; in this case, it contains the clue to resolving the copyright issue. The contributor quite rightly noted that the website she was flagged as copying actually copied from another Wikipedia article - but that means so did she, and Wikipedia's content is not public domain. In this case, the problem is fixed according to the instructions at Copying within Wikipedia. If you're not able to find the issue, you might want to ask for assistance or just leave the CSB notice alone so somebody else can look. The notice offers some protection to copyright holders and our reusers in the event that infringement does occur, as it at least alerts them to the problem. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:12, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing my article Comment
Thank you for reviewing my article The MAGIC criteria, it's the first one I've created. What does it mean that it has been reviewed? -- PeterLFlomPhD (talk) 00:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * It simply means a third-party user has reviewed it as part of the New Pages Patrol. Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  02:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the New Article review
Thanks for the New Article review of Hanoi exhibition Icarusgeek (talk) 06:42, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Camilla Kenyon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. John's Presbyterian Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Wiki love mislabeled?
After posting recently to Liz's talk page, I scanned up and was startled to see that I had sent her a wiki love message. At the moment it says "Sphilbrick has given you a fresh pie!" After a tiny bit of investigation, it appears that the editor name is replaced with whomever last edited the page. I haven't looked closely enough to see why this is so, but wanted to bring it to your attention. Do you see the same thing I see? I wondered if somehow it displays whoever is currently viewing the page although I don't know how to do that.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  18:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes I noticed that and attempted fix it multiple times and hopefully it works with this last one. If not, it may be something with the script. SwisterTwister   talk  20:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks fixed.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  20:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Re: Spam accounts
I blocked the Rezidence.lk account and deleted their spam. We'll see if they come back or not. I also blocked the VoIP4CallCenters account. These random article spammers make me laugh at what they hit. Like the other day when. Pigs Cows in Space!!! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Whether a bot or not, they may not be familiar with how the website works and may be getting there through random articles (random article button included). SwisterTwister   talk  20:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That's what I meant. I think they are hitting the random article button.  The Rezidence.lk account was likely not a bot due to the way it made a new section.  VoIP4CallCenters may be, but probably not.  The cow one was definitely not a bot.  Either way, it was some poor SEO work. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Re: Enrique Gatti
Re your message: I think I'd go with a redirect to the band's article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:54, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Request on 19:01:53, 5 August 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by NHfootballfan
Hello SwisterTwister, my recent attmept at creating the page "KBACE Technologies, Inc." was declined due to lack of notariety, and it has been suggested to find more, reliable sources. Is the current problem that there is too few sources, or that they aren't relaible enough?

Thanks for your feedback!

NHfootballfan (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)NHfootballfan

NHfootballfan (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

It's not exactly the reliability, it's more that it needs better coverage sources (too few sources I suppose summarizes it). SwisterTwister  talk  19:07, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you...
...for patrolling my first en-step. Greetings from Hamburg. :-) --Koyaanis (talk) 20:55, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Technical note
Just a quick request — when you're adding a debate to the AFD log, could you put it on a new line? If two debates are transcluded on the same line, the second one gets messed up; see the Farleon entry near the top of this revision. Lest I be unclear, I'm not complaining at you; I just figured it was something you'd not known. I'd never noticed this until a few minutes ago. Nyttend (talk) 22:33, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notification, copying and pasting is different through mobile even when using desktop version so it always gets it close to the other one. Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  22:37, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Dominic Durden
I had a look on the web about this person. They seem to have a fair bit of coverage, but I haven't looked closely. However, the real problem is that the article may be a paraphrase of this news piece I found. I'll try to clean it up later today. &mdash;George8211 / T 11:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Article curation
Conejito pls. --Bakebread (talk) 02:18, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

DYKs
I am writing to acknowledge your message to me. I will get back to you in depth soon hopefully (I'm working on an article that I'm trying to get to nominatable form by Monday, and time on my weekends is usually short). Daniel Case (talk) 17:56, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Review?
What does this mean: "(Page curation log); 19:48 . . SwisterTwister (talk | contribs) marked Second APC Philadelfi road ambush as reviewed"

Regards, Jokkmokks-Goran (talk) 16:27, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It has been reviewed by a third-party user as part of the New Pages Patrol. SwisterTwister   talk  16:29, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, World Government (Mormonism), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Mike Lee
You may want to have a look at Mike Lee.The Cross Bearer (talk) 04:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

2016 Kids' Choice Awards
Hello, I saw that you recently reviewed the 2016 Kids' Choice Awards page. I just wanted to let you know that, the article has no sources whatsoever. No nominations has been announced for that particular award show yet, as it will be held next year and even the date of the show is still not confirmed. The page has been created by known ip vandal. It is operating through multiple ip's and vandalizing number of Wikipedia articles. He or she is not communicating with other editors at all. All the information, provided in the article was fake, you can check yourself. I just wanted to enlighten you on this matter. Regards--Jockzain (talk) 23:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks for mentioning that and I was curious about that being unsourced but I never actually looked at the history. It may need to be protected so, would you be willing? Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  23:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem, and yes it will be good if the article can get protection.--Jockzain (talk) 23:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. WP:RFPP might have been a little quicker, though it wasn't time critical. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:55, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

My Love from the Star (film), Patrolled
To SwisterTwister thanks for patrolling a page of this filmMarkHerson (talk) 04:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Question
Do you have an opinion on User_talk:MBisanz?  MBisanz  talk 23:33, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your turn
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Shahbaz, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ruse (book), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiran Bir Sethi, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thom Serafin, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davindra Singh (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReGlobe (2nd nomination)  DGG ( talk ) 05:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey Dave, I'm always watching for the AfDs you start and I hope you had fun with those. :) Simply FYI, I don't know sometimes whether pinging you and talk page messaging is better and quicker (a few months ago, I remember I pinged at several individual AfDs and you never responded there) but I appreciate your attention with that long list. Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  05:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * At present, it is better to notify me on my talk page, so I can do them together, but I will usually see a ping also. Five or 6  a day is no problem.--even 10--it's better than looking through the whole list. I might possibly not answer a ping when I have no useful comment.  DGG ( talk ) 13:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Adonnis
I need help undeleting this page Adonnis - the artist has had significant exposure and is of notability. He's been featured on MTV and has an extensive history of releases


 * The best thing would be to make a sandbox version of it (User:License2Kill/Sandbox) and add as much as possible especially good sources to establish notability. It has to be a good version so the previous consensus for deletion is no longer applicable. If he's not independently notable, he can be mentioned at a relevant article. SwisterTwister   talk  20:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Shoy. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, The Partnership (disambiguation), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. shoy (reactions) 20:23, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Hamilton (musical)
You have got to get yourself tickets to see this show!E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Request on 08:23:40, 20 August 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Hag da bard
I do not see the reason for your decline since this is not a organisation or company. VPNEncap is free OpenSource Software for Linux Distributions which is comparable to TOR but better - According to this fact this cannot be judged by the rules for companies or organisations. Please give some adequat hint for soluting this issue.

Hag da bard (talk) 08:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, in case, I meant to say product. The article still could better sources and the current tone sounds more like a guide. If you need further help, see your welcome links or ask here again. Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  15:56, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Article recovery
Is there any way to have the Andrew Phillip Almanza article recovered? Not sure why it was deleted if he is on many television shows and commercials and gets police escorts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamescott222 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

DYKs
Hi.

DYK is to showcase new content. For Lester Dragstedt I cannot see how it would qualify for DYK, it is not new, it is not expanded 5 times in the last week, and it is not a Good article. Similarly Woolrich has not improved much in the last week. Similarly for Broadnose sevengill shark your improvements were in June, so it is a bit late to nominate in August (and I suspect not a 5× size boost). And for Sharpnose sevengill shark nothing has changed since February. So unfortunately they would all fail a DYK nomination. Sorry to let you hear the bad news. For many years I avoided DYK because I thought it was too complicated, and then I found it hard to get something ready in 5 days after I started it. My name is on the list as someone who can move stuff to the queue. But I also do some reviews and nominations. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:37, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Hmm, very well, I thought those snippets that I listed were interesting enough for a DYK (especially judging from what I see pass as DYK sometimes). It's worth mentioning I would've nominated them myself sooner if it wasn't I find the DYK listing process too challenging. FYI, I never mentioned sharpnose sevengill shark for DYK (only broadnose). SwisterTwister   talk  06:42, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The hooks are fine, it is just the articles are not new enough. To qualify you could upgrade them to good article status!  Or the next article you start could perhaps qualify. I can still help you nominate one if you want assistance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:21, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Help Me
I've been trying to get the deletion sorting tool (APerson's script) to work but it's not. I'd sincerely like some help with this. SwisterTwister  talk  07:36, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I've managed to get this working by going to Special:MyPage/Skin.js then vector.js (if that's the theme you're using), and adding . You'll then need to force a refresh. Could you let me know if that works? Samuel Tarling (talk) 08:35, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That was it and it works excellently now! Thanks, SwisterTwister   talk  03:26, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Kithara
I moved the article Kithara to Cithara on 12 April 2013‎. I have restored the redirect after the mess created by an IP address. If they want to create an article they will have to create one with a dab extension. -- PBS (talk) 08:48, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Kristine Sa AfD

 * Hi SwisterTwister, thank you for pinging me in the AfD for Kristine Sa. Wow...2007 was when I participated in the original AfD? I don't remember that AfD or why I commented there! :D I shall not be participating in this new AfD - mainly because I moved away from AfD long ago - but I wanted to thank you for notifying me; it is appreciated. :) Best. Acalamari 10:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Stephen Marchionda
Greetings,

I'm glad this discussion is taking place as I've been wanting to update the information in this article. I am very much a newbie here, so please advise. I've added material to the page Articles for deletion/Stephen Marchionda and will add more references soon. Please check if you can and excuse me if not properly done..

Best wishes, Boxstrum (talk) 13:41, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Multipolarity of Gamma Radiation
Hi SwisterTwister, you have recently patrolled my article on Multipolarity. What does patrolling mean? HPaul (talk) 19:17, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It means it has been patrolled by a third-party user as part of the New Pages Patrol. SwisterTwister   talk  19:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you!HPaul (talk) 19:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Re: Articles
Re your message: Per the outcome of Articles for deletion/Julia Winter, the article should be a redirect. No additional claim towards notability has been added in the recent edits. There were no additional roles added or reliable citations establishing her notability beyond Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

Jordan Fry at least has additional roles since Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and there has been no AfD regarding the article, so it could be argued either way (redirect or full article). You might consider listing the article for AfD to settle the matter.

Also you likely have a logged out sockpuppet of FrozenFan2. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I was aware of the AfD but I still wondered whether it should be protected. SwisterTwister   talk  04:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Sure, that seems reasonable. I semi-protected it for a year.  If a year passes and she has new roles, then it can be reconsidered. Though if she hasn't had a new role in 10 years, it doesn't seem likely anything will change in a year. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bājūrī Ibrāhīm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BRILL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Cadsoft Corporation
I don't think I'm the person you wanted to ask about this article. I just did some early wikification. RJFJR (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/The Tokens The Animated Series
Hey, I suspect that as per WP:BADNAC you should not have closed this as you are not an administrator and so can't delete the page. Everymorning (talk) 22:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes but that was an obvious delete (FWIW, although I could've waited until it was deleted, deleting admins won't always close it). Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  22:44, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Removing CSB tags
Hello, SwisterTwister. In reviewing the SCV listing for August 6th, I see that you removed the CSB tag from this article with a note saying "Fixing slight copy."

There are several issues with this action.

First, if the external site were copyright owner of that content, your fixes would not address the copyright problem.

Your edits are too minimal to eradicate the taking of creative content from that source and would at best constitute a derivative work. To eradicate copying concerns, content must be completely rewritten, not modified. Changes like moving words from "The national flag at times was charged " to read "At times, the national flag was charged" will not address the issue. (Close paraphrasing explains why not in a little more detail.)

However, in this case the external site does not own the copyright. They are in fact copying from the article Flag of Bulgaria. Thus, the copyright infringement is internal from the authors of that article and all the other articles copied into that page. It can be fixed by adding attribution, as discussed earlier, but that attribution is mandatory.

I'm repairing the copyright problems with that article. If you're going to rewrite content that is copied, please be sure to do so from scratch as policy requires. If possible, please be conscious in your new page reviewing of the possibility of copying from mirrors and fix such copyvios caused by copying content without legally required attribution by providing that attribution. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I remember that one well but there wasn't much to change without affecting the article's sensibility so I did the best I could (fixing the most outstanding to me). SwisterTwister   talk  19:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If copyrighted content can't be removed without affecting the article's sensibility, we delete the article. Or the section. Or whatever it takes to get rid of the copyright violation. You can even blank the article or the section with copyvio and leave it for somebody else to handle. It is one of our core policies and one of our chief legal policies that content on Wikipedia must be legal. If it's not, it has to go. Please don't remove the CSB notice if you can't figure out how to fix the problem. Let somebody else handle it who does. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Request on 17:43:56, 1 September 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by MegCuse
I received some feedback on adding additional citations, please let me know if there are specific areas in the submission you’d like me to address with more citations.

MegCuse (talk) 17:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

MegCuse (talk) 17:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

multiple nominations
When you do want to nominate multiple pages at one time, there's aspecial procedure, given at WP:AFD. I consider it unduly complicated, and it can't be done with Huggle. I've used it a very few times, but what I usually do is nominate the articles separately, but next to each other., by preparing them first, and then clicking submit for both within a few seconds.  DGG ( talk ) 16:53, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I've considered it and often will but I find these articles randomly (especially searching for long-lived fabricated ones) so I never know what I'll find. Speaking of fabricated, Articles for deletion/Jack Robichaux is nearing snow delete and the subject appeared quite fabricated. Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  18:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Problem is, doing it by just adding the name in the Afd rationale does not set up the page notices & templates.  DGG ( talk ) 04:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: Two things
Re your message: I blocked the account and the article has already been protected by Favonian. You should probably use WP:UAA and WP:RFPP next time. While I am usually here, I do disappear from time to time. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Qwertyus. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Moncef Ouhaibi, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 18:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

AfD Aftermath American Band
I was surprised to see this page nominated for deletion a few days ago. Even more surprised that you wanted to delete it for now despite what you wrote about your own research. The band has a 30 year history that includes countless magazine articles by the largest metal magazines in the world. Multiple labels have released their material in fact Shadow Kingdom Records reissued their Eyes of Tomorrow record yesterday. Blabbdermouth.net featured their comeback last month. That site has 3 million unique visitors a month. The band was also feature in Gary Sharpe Young's book A-Z of Thrash Metal. Included on the Metal Forces' Compilation Scream Your Brains Out. And they sued Dr. Dre for trademark infringement. In terms of citations, the lawsuit is cited, the record labels are listed, the book is cited. How and what needs to be done to improve the citations? Zoident (talk) 15:13, 5 September 2015 (UTC)Zoident

Michael Clifford
Hiya its Courtneyxox here and i see you changed michaels page. If possible can you leave it unchanged for a week as it's a prank for the 5SOS fam not to believe everything they see online and read about the boys. Thank you ever so much Courtneyxox (talk) 21:56, 5 September 2015 (UTC)Courtneyxox Courtneyxox (talk) 21:56, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * No, Wikipedia is not here to play games. If you want to learn more about editing, see Welcome, Young and New contributors' help page. SwisterTwister   talk  21:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Its just a harmless prank why take things seriously.Whats wrong with teaching people what they read is possibly a lie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Courtneyxox (talk • contribs) 22:03, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you want to experiment editing, use the Sandbox. SwisterTwister   talk  22:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Sunders
Hello SwisterTwister, your again redirect is wrong! Therefore I deleted it before and only the headline must than be deleted. Thanks in advance and regards. -- Sweepy (talk) 19:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * However, the Wiktionary link is also at the disambiguation and adding the "s" is plausible for someone searching any of those articles. The best way to get redirect pages deleted is either by speedy or WP:RfD.  SwisterTwister   talk  19:08, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Center for Healthcare Innovation Article Draft
Hello,

I am a first time article author and would appreciate any guidance you could give me on how to better improve my article so it can be published. How many sources would you recommend I include? Here is the link to my draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daisy_Ren_1991/sandbox If I save a draft and redo the sources (before I resubmit the article for publication), are you willing to look at it again? Daisy Ren 1991 (talk) 14:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Daisy

Page Nomination
Dear SwisterTwister. Hello,I just want to know why you added a deletion nomination to the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayman_Alatar If the reason because you don't find resources that's because the title was incorrect and finally I recorrected it. So please remove the nomination.I'll write more information about the famous Libyan singer in the next few days. Thanks Emmakarima (talk) 23:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Blassingame, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grayson County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Request on 14:52:51, 10 September 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by MegCuse
Hi. I wanted to check on the status of the Green BEAN Delivery page I created. Thanks!

MegCuse (talk) 14:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

MegCuse (talk) 14:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

16:08:33, 10 September 2015 review of submission by Clairedongo
I believe the sources I listed are credible and the subject is a notable figure in our society. Clairedongo (talk) 16:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Why does everyone keep erasing Drover's Secret Life?
Hi, I created the page Drover's Secret Life. Since it's inception, everyone has been bent on erasing it, even though it is notable. Why is it that there an individual article for every single Twilight character, when those books have such terrible reviews, but something that has won multiple awards keeps being reverted? I'm just wondering what the reasoning behind this is. White Arabian mare (talk) 01:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I hear you (I'm very much not a fan of Twilight) but it's a matter of there's enough for an (notable) article. SwisterTwister   talk  01:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I hate Twilight too. It's just that Hank the Cowdog has won several awards, and there's actually a request on the talk page (from 2008) for each book to have its own article. I had written a complete summary, character list, and added references, and then another user erased it all. Sigh.😔 White Arabian mare (talk) 16:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks very much, I prefer working at AfD and patrolling pages rather than being involved with drama.  SwisterTwister   talk  16:48, 13 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I was actually coming by to say exactly the same thing! Every time I turn around, you have added a vote with quality research. So double above.New Media Theorist (talk) 07:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! It's nice to see so many good users at AfD and certainly better than being involved with drama. Cheers and greetings from Texas (not sure if we share the same time zone where ever you're in Canada),  SwisterTwister   talk  07:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm in Quebec, which is always an hour later and 20 degrees celcius colder than TexasNew Media Theorist (talk) 07:11, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's getting closer to winter here and the weather is cooling (staying mostly 80s and 70s (F) with close encounters of 60s (F)). I'm assuming you're at a night owl with it being 3AM (I'm going to be going to bed here soon). Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  07:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I concur with this barnstar. You have been doing admirable work in AfDs, demonstrating properly how to !vote. LibStar (talk) 08:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Editing Trustpilot's article
Hi SwisterTwister, I was in contact with FreeRangeFrog in August, but have not heard from that user in a while now. I saw that you posted something on his/her page, so I hope it is alright that I am contacting you here. I had begun the process of editing Trustpilot's article, but have not received any feedback. As I wrote on the talk page, I have suggested edits and called for feedback before editing the actual page. Before going any further, I would really like a wikipedia editor to have a look at my suggestions so the edits can be a collaborative process. Is this something you could help with? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated :) Cheers, TrustieCPH (talk) 08:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited José Antonio Lacayo de Briones y Palacios, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Galicia, Viana and La Rioja. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

nre Articles for deletion/Agradoot
Just to let you know, since you opined a delete, the article has been well and properly sourced and the nominator has withdrawn and changed to a "keep" himself. I was going to close it, but wanted to let you have the opportunity to review your opinion. However, you need not change your !vote. Just wanted to keep you in the loop. Best,  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 14:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, the article looks good now. SwisterTwister   talk  17:54, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for looking back in.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 22:59, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

The Hemp Trading Company
Hi! Just done a cleanup of The Hemp Trading Company - hope it looks good to you now. Still need to find places to link to it from, but I actually quite enjoyed researching it...! Mabalu (talk) 18:42, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey, yes, I actually looked it earlier so the sources are better now. While it may not be like Woolrich (company) (which I improved), it is better now and no one likes environmentalism more than me. Cheers ! SwisterTwister   talk  18:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Second party input needed...
Hi David,

I've seen you give solid advice in AFD, so I thought I'd ask you to check out this edit, where an anon reverted my removal of what I considered to be a non-notable tradition: I don't want to start an edit war. --Slashme (talk) 19:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi! Just wanted to thank you for your assistance in responding to some of the AfC queries I got on my talk page. Appreciate the help. Take care.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 22:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, I enjoy seeing you around and am more than happy to help.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 18 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Symyx Technologies page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=681591667 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F681591667%7CSymyx Technologies%5D%5D Ask for help])

Hello SiwsterTwister, I wanted to thank you for your contribution to the page "José Antonio Lacayo de Briones y Palacios" where you added several footnotes. I intend to also dedicate time to include more footnotes and improve the suggestions that appear on the page. There are several publications that make reference to this person (i.e., the Geneological Academy of Guatemala, the Revista Conservadora de Nicaragua, a History of Nicaragua written inthe XIXth century by Tomás Ayón, and other publications). I also would like to thank you for sending me your tips about editing and creating pages in Wikipedia. They look uqite useful and, to be honest, I am a total rookie in this matter, but I intend to be more dexterous eventually! Thanks again. Ralacayo Ralacayo (talk) 01:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Creation of Akhtar Raza Khan
I dont know why you people are beheaving so biased. The article is properly sourced with 3rd party references and it full fills all the guidlines. Ejaz92 (talk) 07:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Request on 16:48:04, 20 September 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Cmurphey80
I submitted DiCentral for the third time to be reviewed. I waited almost three weeks just to have it turned down for the same reasons. To update the article I completely rewrote as I went through competitors that do have wiki pages to make sure it fit the notability guidelines. I followed several companies to get my third party resources. Sps Commerence, Opentext, and Trilogy Company. If they are accepted and we are not, I can't figure out what the difference is. Please advise, should the companies I mentioned be deleted off wikipedia?. Cmurphey80 (talk) 16:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

AfDs for American football players
Hey, Swister, I saw that you were adding the delete-sort notices for various AfDs for sportspersons. There appear to be a number of AfDs for American football players which are are not listed under the American football-related AfD delete sort -- I'd be grateful if you would add that to your to-do list. If you need help identifying the AfDs, please let me know. Cheers and thanks for helping out with the delete sorts. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, it would be easier and simpler if you were to identify them, yes. Thanks, SwisterTwister   talk  06:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Swister, currently pending AfDs for American football players: I'll review the rest of the general sports-related AfD list, too, and let you know. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 01:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Jacques Smith
 * Jocquel Skinner

09:02:53, 21 September 2015 review of submission by Arrt75012
Hello, This is Arrt75012, about the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Philippe_Adrien_(English) I spoke with Onel5969 and did everything he asked me to concerning notability and POV ; there are 30 external links towards completely independent sources. What can I do to improve the notability of this article ? Thank you

16:45:05, 21 September 2015 review of submission by C S Chaffee
Regarding your review and rejection of Draft: Chet Bowers, Your comment was that the subject "seems" notable but that the article needs more third party references and you name newspapers and media in particular. The references I have included are published, third party (under Wikipedias own definition of third party) comments that refer to the subject or his work. These references come from people who have their own established careers as best selling authors, researchers, educators, lawyers, etc. Just guessing, but I'd say that more people have been notable in their fields and have had a notable impact within their genre, than have been interviewed by CNN or Newsweek. I will add more references but I was attempting to keep the article as succinct and simple as possible.C S Chaffee (talk) 16:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Dropping in,, an extensive ideas section like you used is usually inappropriate here. Justifying an inclusion by saying that someone said "This book would never have come without the years of mentorship offered to all of us by Chet Bowers." is not appropriate either, because in a forward, authors normally cite everyone they can think of, as it's taken as an insult to be omitted. Such forwards in book are basically mutual back-scratching. An extensive quote from a review is not used either, if the reviewer  is not an authority--most academic book reviews are done by junior people. You cannot say "Bowers' experience with both Western and aboriginal cultures, in addition to his contact with scholars representing a broad range of disciplines, " unless there's a reliable 3rd party source.  The external links are excessive. Please read WP:EL--one link to his principal website is sufficient, not a link to amazon, and not al ink to misc places where a notice of one of his lectures is posted.  DGG ( talk ) 16:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

multiple nominations
I don't think handling 5 different bios in one afd is a practical idea, and I closed as non-consensus to allow an immediate renomination. For one thing, it makes it hard to discuss. For another, it makes it hard to close: you seem to have missed one or more of the intricate steps in the manual procedure; one article never got a notice at all, and after the close most of the others didn't update right, and I had to go around updating the talk pages and the articles pages one at a time. When I try it, I usually make some mistake also, so I've stopped trying to use it even when the topics are very closely related. If you do want to use it, stick to two, and verify that both pages get the right notices and that they clear properly after the afd.  DGG ( talk ) 16:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I hear you but I was hoping to save the trouble of separate nominations and clicks and there were not per se connected but were about the size and in terms of sourcing (questionably notable). FWIW, I made Articles for deletion/ESR Technology with four instead. I'll start the renominations shortly because I feel those all need to be deleted. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  16:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Review of Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan
Brother you are declining my submission for review. As you said in the "The amount of sources is somewhat acceptable but could use more and also better information about him and his accomplishments" I am requesting you to please review it soon if the amount of source is acceptable.I have been waiting for 2 month for review. Once you accept it then "more and also better information about him and his accomplishments" could be added by the reader too. Acting on your advice I am trying my best to add more sources and info to it. Thanks... Ejaz92 (talk) 10:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Detail in Afd discussions
I notice that we often comment on the same articles in deletion discussions. Is the level of detail that I put in my comments off-putting or do you think that it helps the discussion? examples: Articles for deletion/Battra, Articles for deletion/Moonshot (magazine), and Articles for deletion/Overflowing Futures. (I admit that I did get a little snide at Articles for deletion/Vested business brokers.) --Bejnar (talk) 21:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * From what I see, they are good votes. SwisterTwister   talk  23:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Request to revisit the discussion. North America1000 15:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

AfD closures
Hi. Thank you for closing AfDs. When closing as 'Redirect' please remember to include the 'R from X' template on the redirect page so that it adds the correct message and automatically populates the appropriate category. In the case of this page for example, it would be R from school. I've done it for you this time - take a look. Happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

13:38:33, 29 September 2015 review of submission by Molamrabe
Hi everybody,

The article on "Asiem El Difraoui" was published simultaneously in German and French, both of which have been carefully reviewed and accepted. The submitted version in English contains references to major books and award-winning films created and produced by Mr. El Difraoui. Could you therefor please explain why you consider that the submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability? I can only imagine that there's been a mistake.

Thank you very much in advance for your help!

Careful with WP:CANVAS
As you stated you have did so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zuma: Tales of a Sexual Gladiator, it might be seen as inappropriate to "ping" users who in the past have opined for deleting many other adult film related articles. In notifying others it IS appropriate under WP:AFD to review an article's edit history and send a neutral note to any who had made sunbstantial contributions to that article. Cheers  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 22:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * As long as they are interested with that topic and can give feedback about it (whether delete or not), there is consensus. Unlike others, I like to notify anyone who can give a useful comment including past contributors or interested users (who only seem to opine for deletion because they are familiar with that topic). Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  23:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Were actual article contributors notified?? Or interested projects?? Or were editors "pinged" who advocated "keeps"??? Their personal "Interest" aside, if an editor does little to improve such topics and is widely known for !voting at AFDs for the removal of such content, bringing their attention to an AFD they would likely find all by themselves could be seen as a possible attempt at Votestacking even were that not the intention. As perception is everything here, I only urge caution. Best,  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 23:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Sakharov Center page
Hi! You recently wrote to me about my draft for the Sakharov Center https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ariella_Katz#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Sakharov_Center_.28September_19.29 that, "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia." Could you tell me about specific sections that are not notable enough and specific sections that need more/different citation than is in the current version? In other words, which specific sections are the problem? Do you have any suggestions specific to my article for making it better? I really appreciate your help in advance! Ariella Katz (talk) 01:44, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Exactly what I said wih my comment, the article needs more sources about the subject if available. SwisterTwister   talk  01:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Help - Self-Promotion and COI Attack by Competitor
Hello, LauraMaurer recommended that I reach out to you for help. Below is a modified message I had sent to FreeRangeFrog and Wikipedia complaint and have heard NOTHING. I also put this message on the talk pages for Peter Rhse and BU Rob13 as well.

Help is needed. This is Model Mugging regarding evidence of self-promotion and COI regarding attack on us by competitor.

There has been no reply to the talk on Model Mugging. This editing game Wikipedia has does not seem to have any standard rules, especially for libel-slanderous behavior. The last edits to the Model Mugging editing war are wrong.

In a prior edit, Peter Rehse wrote “Wikipedia is not here to advertise any entity but to provide information” – I ask whether rumors is providing information because it falls into Wiki’s tabloid journalism definition. The author of that article says she is writing about rumors.

Why are Wikipedia editors insisting on a source that the author admits to being rumors and from another lying Wikipedia editor?

I am hopeful, because upon reviewing the history of the Model Mugging page, Wikipedia editors saw what Impact was doing in 2005 as self-promotion and personal advertisement. Model Mugging was unaware what Impact was doing at that time.

It is my hope you are simply unaware of what Impact is up to again in 2015.

Do you see a problem with Impact self-advertisement? I put a picture summary report together with a small amount of historical background – please click to view summary report: http://modelmugging.org/history/impact-self-defense-wikipedia-attack.pdf

I have identified tag teaming efforts of Nefariousski in latest Impact Self-Defense attack against us. She is loaded with hypocritical contradictions such as COI, biographies of living persons (BLP), lack of editing balance, failure of editing in a NPOV, disregard to consensus for disputes, using an unreliable source to make libel-slanderous statements. And she is involved in a campaign to promote a competitor, Impact Self-Defense.

The Impact group has repeated misquoted a training incident that occurred 30 years ago that made it into a tabloid magazine written by Peri in Mother Jones. The American Press Association Principles of Journalism identifies "journalism‘s first obligation is to the truth, and also discipline of verification. . ." as listed on the APA website. The Peri article violates the APA’s principles. The source also falls into Wikipedia tabloid journalism definition and sensationalism.

Nefariousski and other writers insist on using the term ‘sexual assault’, which is not used in the article. Even after Nefariousski was corrected by FreeRangeFrog about her inappropriateness of using the term “sexual assault”, she insisted on using it. Additional editors have also changed the current line to be even more inaccurate. However, ‘rumor’ is used numerous times. Peri writes, “The staff of Women Defending Ourselves had finally begun to feel empowered, but it was a passive sort of empowerment, based on whispers and rumor campaigns instead of direct confrontation.” A 25 plus year old rumor campaign is exactly what Nefariousski, as Impact, is doing!

How is this single source claiming rumors thereby reliable? Mother Jones was not a major publication in 1990, especially when publishing admitted rumors and is loaded with misinformation?

Nefariousski-Impact tag team planned to link the Wikipedia ESD page to a derogatory Model Mugging Wikipedia page highlighting a tabloid source written with accusation heading, “controversy”. Impact also wrote a promotional page and pasted it into her Sandbox. They are also getting around Wikipedia rules against self-promotion using Wikipedia search engine ranking by keeping their page in the sandbox status - FIRST PAGE on search results for "Empowerment Self-Defense".

PLEASE CLICK the pdf link as evidence to view images in summary report of her COI campaign promoting Impact Self-Defense - again: http://modelmugging.org/history/impact-self-defense-wikipedia-attack.pdf

Is this "nefarious" behavior? Should she be blocked and all her edits scrutinized? Does Wikipedia see a problem with hypocritical editor(s)?

I had written a response in Model Mugging Talk PRIOR to discovering the ESD page.

We need the Model Mugging site corrected and will also need protection against other Impact organizational associates tag teaming inaccurate edits.

Thank you for your assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiipedia-posting (talk • contribs) 03:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

12:59:37, 1 October 2015 review of submission by Csinacola
Hi SwisterTwister -

Appreciate your comments, review and encouragement. Have been searching for as many sources as possible on the Perry Rosenthal profile. Can you be more specific as to which citations need additional support? I had thought I had supported them all, but am willing to seek out more (if it's out there!), so any further guidance appreciated.

Thanks. Csinacola (talk) 12:59, 1 October 2015 (UTC)CSinacola


 * I simply think it could use any further sources to provide additional support. SwisterTwister   talk  23:20, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Request on 23:08:28, 1 October 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Gtownrower23
Hi,

Could you provide more clarity on why the Mercury Capital Advisors page was not approved. It seems like it is notable. The firm was number one in private placements in the first half of 2015, and has been in the top five for private placements in the last 5 years. Other less notable private placement agencies have pages. If you could help it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.l

Gtownrower23 (talk) 23:08, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Specifically more third-party sources. SwisterTwister   talk  23:20, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi TwisterSwister,

Thanks for your comments on my page 'Capture Management'. I have made changes and expanded the page but it has not gone live yet. Could have a look at the changes please?

Thanks Alex King-Zhang (talk) 15:47, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

More sources
Hi SwisterTwister I have questions about draft:lynne Reeves Griffin. You stated that the sources were not reliable and I'm just confused as they are almost all articles in major newspapers. Also, you left a comment that the article could use more sources. Was there a section in particular that you would like to see more sources for? And what type of sources if not newspaper articles? Thanks! Goldencam (talk) 21:21, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
-- Sam Sailor Talk! 17:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Swister. I hope this finds you well. Would you comment in the AfD, please? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Request on 17:43:33, 3 October 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Furbierules
Hello SwisterTwister! (If I'm not in the right place, please let me know and I'll never show up here again! Should I go to the Tea House instead? This is my first Wiki experience.)

Thank you for reviewing my recent contribution (referenced above). I'm not clear on two points: -- You note that it reads more like a report or essay than an encyclopedic article; what do you mean specifically? ==> Is there somewhere I can look up this distinction? ==> What types of changes would I need to make to render the article acceptable? -- You also encourage me to use secondary, reliable info, using no original research. ==> Nothing that appears in the article is my material, and I include references to approximately 78 distinct, verifiable sources (links are provided), so I'm not sure what to make of that note?

I thank you for any help or guidance that you are able to provide! Furbierules Furbierules (talk) 17:43, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Furbierules (talk) 17:43, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

17:53:01, 3 October 2015 review of submission by Furbierules
Hello again SwsterTwister - Furbie rules again. ;-) Can you tell me if Part I (What is Memory Reconsolidation?) meets the encyclopedic standards? Is it Parts II and III that pose a problem because they contain statements of implication/application? Just trying to see where the problems lie specifically! Thanks again. Furbierules (talk) 17:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey Furbie The article looks good but it's parts like "What is....?" and "how it works" that are usually not used. There's also currently an article for memory consolidation and the start of this article doesn't seem to differ from that. Simply take your time and know there is no deadline and resubmit when improved. Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  19:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

20:20:03, 3 October 2015 review of submission by Furbierules
Thank you so much SwisterTwister. I'm glad the content looks good. I'll see what I can do about those sorts of phrasings, especially in the titles (which seem to be the main problem - is that right?). Any other comments welcome. Cheers to you too! Furbierules (talk) 20:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

11:39, 5 October Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byakuren Kaikan
Hello and thank you for your welcome. I'm a new user and not that used to the world of Wikipedia. My first effort to contribute to the encyclopedia is the article on the Byakuren Kaikan, which now risks to be deleted for reasons I can't say I really agree with. Anyway, I added as much references and sources I can, although most of them are in Japanese. As for today I added more articles I could find on some magazines, please check the discussion page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Byakuren_Kaikan

Also, I would like to know if there is anything else I could do to prevent this page from being deleted as it costed me time and effort to create it and I'd like it to be a reference for anyone looking for information on this style on the web in English.

Thanks a lot for your attention.

Kagite (talk) 11:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
 * As many users have said there including myself, the article can be moved to your userspace until it is better and has better sourcing. No worries, take your time and resubmit when better! Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  17:24, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

OK I will try to improve the page incorporating more sources. I will create a draft page (I think this is the procedure): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ByakurenKaikan/Kagite Then I will move it back to the original article once finished. Thank you for your support. Kagite (talk) 06:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

AfD closures 2
Hi. Thank you for closing AfDs. When closing as 'Redirect' please remember to include the 'R from X' template on the redirect page so that it adds the correct message and automatically populates the appropriate category. In the case of this page for example, it would be R from school. I've done it for you this time - take a look. Happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi.
Hello. I do not understand where I can leave you a message. so I write here. If I chose the wrong place, please let me know! I just recently on Wikipedia.

Thank you fix my page [Cally-Jo]. I do not quite know very well English. but I tried to write an article to make it clear to all. If you can, you correct my mistakes (speaking, punctuation). I would be very grateful! Thank you for understanding. Nedika (talk) 17:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Matthew Stevens (musician) - how to link disambiguation
Hello, Thank you for accepting the article []. Could you advise on how to add this article to the disambiguation page []?

Also, how could I improve the status of the article? Thanks! (Ongaku ongaku (talk) 21:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC))

About your censoring of List of devices supported by CyanogenMod
You are not improving Wikipedia by deleting useful content. Shame on you! I will not support Wikipedia economically anymore! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.44.113.82 (talk) 17:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)


 * If you believe that the closer of the deletion discussion interpreted the consensus incorrectly, please see Deletion review. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 20:24, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Request for re-review https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Paloma_Lokus
Hi Swister, kindly requesting your re-review after doubling up on citations and intensely studying notability and golden rule guidelines, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Paloma_Lokus respectfully Reddoggzz (talk) 19:20, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Did you spot...
this fabulous edit by the creator of the Yamaguchi article? Guy (Help!) 11:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Bruce Judson page
Thank you for patrolling the page on Bruce Judson. I know that autobiography articles are strongly discouraged. However, this may be a case where I meet the notability guidelines. If you agree, can you remove the warnings on the page, and/or review it for a neutral tone?

Notability:

--I have written four books released by major US publishers such as Scribner and HarperCollins, and as indicated in verifiable press articles cited in the Wikipedia article I am a bestselling author. --In it's first ever list, Advertising Age named me as one of the nation's leading Cybermarketers (verified in Wikipedia article) (i.e. the magazine recognized my influence on the Internet advertising business).

--I was the co-founder of the Yale Journal on Regulation, which has a Wikipedia page.(verified in Wikipedia article)

--I was the co-founder of Pathfinder which has a Wikipedia page.(verified in Wikipedia article)

--The biographer Walter Isaacson credits me with inventing the concept of the banner ad, in two verifiable interviews.(verified in Wikipedia article)

--As indicated in the Wikipedia article, I was the subject of featured (verifiable) profiles or interview articles, in print and online, in the Wall Street Journal, Entrepreneur Magazine (twice), and Advertising Age.(verified in Wikipedia article)

--A bestselling book, "Burn Rate", includes several pages about me in discussing the origins of the Internet advertising business (verified in Wikipedia article with Business Week review of the book, also Google "Bruce Judson, Burn Rate, Michale Wolff and the pages in the book come up).

--There are many more press interviews and quotes from me (including the New York Times front page) which are not in the Wikipedia article but can be verified. (is more necessary?)

Thanks for your help

````Bruce Judson — Preceding unsigned comment added by BruceJudson (talk • contribs) 12:58, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Request on 17:32:03, 9 October 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Csinacola
Hi SwisterTwister, I have added several additional citations/notes for the Perry Rosenthal profile, including references to articles in the Harvard University Gazette, the Boston Business Journal, and Eyeworld, newsletter of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, plus two other references to Dr. Rosenthal's work as a lecture and adviser, including his membership on the editorial board of the Scleral Lens Education Society. I hope this helps. Thanks again for your efforts. CSinacolaCsinacola (talk) 17:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Csinacola (talk) 17:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

2 quick questions (hopefully)
Hi. First, always a pleasure working with you on AfD and AfC. Thanks for all the efforts you put in on both projects. My first question is that I notice you sometimes close AfD's that end up as delete. I've only closed a few, and they've always been keep. If it's a delete determination, I know how to close the discussion, but can I, since I can't delete the article? Second, in one of your comments at AfD I noticed you said you were going back over articles which have been tagged for notability for a while. Is there some type of search that I could use to help with that? I patrol new pages, but don't like deleting them and discouraging new editors (unless it's so obvious). Thanks.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 20:52, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, I use Special:RandomInCategory particularly searching Orphaned articles, Articles with a promotional tone and Articles lacking sources. You can also range by date for example: Orphaned articles from February 2009. I've heavily been searching and searching through and at first searched more for fabricated articles (see List of hoaxes on Wikipedia) but now include articles that are questionably to inclusion thus taken to AfD. I have literally filled my notes with articles I have found while binge searching so it would be nice to have some help. As you may notice at some I've nominated, I have found some articles that simply needed to be taken care when started or tagged (see Vantrix) and because of its orphan nature, no one simply ever found it again. Not to mention, because of these orphans, some articles for companies and bands are basically now useless because they may have closed by now and otherwise non-existent so that's especially targeted for AfD. Cheers,  SwisterTwister   talk  20:58, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Brilliant. Thanks.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i>

Liam Payne Draft
Hi. I see that you denied the Liam Payne draft claiming that it does not meet not the notability standards of Wikipedia and I'm just curious as to how that is. I have gone through the standards multiple times and he absolutely meets them. It is mind boggling to me that a member of the biggest band in the world for the last five years, who has completed projects on his own with world famous artists and producers, who is the only member of the band to work as an individual on a world famous media publication, who has more followers on social media than some countries have people, who has the notoriety for a joke tweet to impact a multibillion dollar corporation and I could continue with countless other reasons which were in my draft, which I'm assuming you have not actually properly read, is less notable than half the people that are given individual wikipedia pages. So I ask that you please explain to me how specifically does he not meet the standards because I'm having a really hard time understanding?

Additionally, I know you stated " Comment: Although he seems to have gotten some attention since starting a solo path, he may still be best known for the group and thus there may not be much for a separate article yet. SwisterTwister talk 06:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)," but then by these standards how is it that any of the other members have solo pages as they too have more notoriety as members of the band, than as individuals.

Beecee14 (talk) 14:18, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Deleted article
Happy to restore Upper Tamakoshi if that makes sense, let me know. (I'm in a Wikimedia confernce at the moment, so haven't looked into it, but saw your note.)-- S Philbrick (Talk)  14:47, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Sources for Rejected Article
Hello,

You recently rejected a draft for a page on a man named Domenico Tranaso: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Domenico_Tranaso&redirect=no

Your reason was that more sources are needed. I found one more source on him, but it does not appear to be related to the event that he is most known for. I'm going to add it anyway. Additionally, there's another potential source (I'm 99% sure that it pertains to him and his attempted takeover of Altamura), however it has to be purchased online in order to be read: http://www.torrossa.it/resources/an/2941719. Would these two sources potentially be enough to warrant a Wikipedia page on him?

ThanksHlt443 (talk) 23:37, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Domenico Tranaso has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Domenico Tranaso, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  23:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Domenico_Tranaso help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

09:56:42, 12 October 2015 review of submission by Svartalxeym
Hi,

I am Svartalxeym user, who submitted article, titled Anar Hasanov. Thank you for your reviewing the article. May I kindly ask you to be specific, what points in the article need additional sources?

Best regards

Rejecting my draft article
Hello,

I see you've rejected the draft of an article I've been writing about for Youssef El Deeb, an Egyptian/Canadian Producer and Director. I have used almost all credible sources that I have found which proves the subject's notability. Can you tell me how else I can move forward so the article is not declined again?

Here is the link to the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Youssef_El_Deeb

Please get back to me as soon as you can.

Thank you  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hebaseham (talk • contribs) 13:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Add any more available sources overall, . SwisterTwister   talk  06:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

AFD - Sk1
Hi Dave, I'm Dave too, Just wanted to make you aware - When closing AFDs - Per WP:SK1 you can't close an AFD as withdrawn if there's a delete !vote present, You closed this AFD as Withdrawn depsite the !vote so technically I should revert but that'd just be a waste of everyones time but wanted to make you aware anyway :), Thanks for your help in closing the AFDs too :), Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 00:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

19:55:44, 13 October 2015 review of submission by Sadievico
This 650-word article contains references from three major newspapers, two books by noted publishers, and three independent web sites, so the comment "needs more available sources overall" doesn't provide enough information to help improve the article. Please provide specific guidance as to the following:

1) What portions of the article are not adequately sourced? 2) Which of the sources are not reliable or otherwise not adequate? 3) What amount of sourcing would be considered adequate, so that sources can be found and added? Thank you.


 * The article looks good but feel free to add any more available sources for weight and depth. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  20:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, but again that isn't very helpful. If the article "looks good" and I should only "feel free" to add more sources, why was the article rejected for lack of reliable sources? In order to improve the article I need more information as to why it's unacceptable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadievico (talk • contribs) 20:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Lisa Moscatiello
Since the result of Articles for deletion/Well Kept Secrets wasn't keep, I nominated the other articles in Template:Lisa Moscatiello for deletion. Blackbombchu (talk) 21:09, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Shivshankar Kadadevarmath
Should I add <small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the list of Brain surgeons-related deletion discussions ? ;) Jim1138 (talk) 18:44, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Ari Norman Article
Hi SwisterTwister - you have just declined my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ari_Norman which is very frustrating because I have worked on the citations over a long period of time including visits to the library and although one reviewer questioned citations originally, they have both (Onel5069 and Sulfurboy) now accepted the citations were good enough and offered advice on the formal tone which has now been rectified. So this is a retrograde development. I have also been on the wikipedia help forum and had approval for the citations when asked for help. Please can you explain why you have declined these sources which I and others would consider reliable. One article I was not able to link to as it is not online but have referenced extensively based on library copy, I am happy to forward to you as an image. This is from a well known and credible newspaper. Many of the other sources are from regional and national newspapers, some from globally respected journals and another from a well known industry book on hallmarking. You have noted that this is a start but I have used over 20 different sources so please could you advise how many more you believe are needed. Many thanks Sharktrager442 (talk) 19:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Add how many more sources are available. SwisterTwister   talk  20:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Hey there, thanks for the response. Can you just explain what you mean? I have just added in a couple more sources to the article just now. Many of the sources that I found are not available online. Do you think I may have enough now?

Sharktrager442 (talk) 21:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for now accepting the article. You are a hero.

Sharktrager442 (talk) 21:57, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

NAC
Heyo SwisterTwister! I saw you performing NACs so thought of suggesting this script. You can practically close an AfD within just three or four clicks. It also helps to relist discussions with two simple clicks. It is an amazing script and I thought it might be useful for you. Regards,  Yash!  09:28, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Redirect deletion - Akamai
There is an article Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks that is equally or more notable than the mere company name, since it drastically changed infringement law. It would be better to have no redirect from the bare word Akamai than to have the company rather than the case. Also "akamai" is a word by itself in Hawaiian (means "smart" or "intelligent"). The disambiguation page also shows another meaning.

It would therefore be better to redirect to the disambiguation page. I propose that as n NPOV compromise. PraeceptorIP (talk) 16:47, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Please see Talk:Akamai - PraeceptorIP (talk) 22:42, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Bob Hardwick
Hello, SwisterTwister, I'm trying to help a new editor who came to the Teahouse looking for direction on improving Draft:Bob Hardwick so that it can pass AfC review. However, I myself am not clear on why the submission was declined. There are three references cited which are from reliable sources and constitute more than mere mentions of Hardwick and his band; and they have performed at a notable event, namely the Obama inauguration, which seems to satisfy another of the specific music-related notability criteria. (Apparently the band also played the Kentucky Derby, per cited sources, though that isn't mentioned in the article as yet; I'm not sure whether performing at that event would also contribute towards notability.) Could you explain why the cited sources do not establish Hardwick's notability, and/or specify what kind of sources or other proofs of notability would be sufficient? Thanks in advance, GrammarFascist   contribs talk 19:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Which article exactly are you talking about, ? SwisterTwister   talk  04:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hello Swister Twister, this is article i am talking about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Shwood_Eyewear Farhankhalid87 (talk) 03:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * }

A barnstar for you!

 * Ah yes, the article looks good but still needs any more available coverage to give it weight and depth (it needs to at least satisfy general notability and or company guidelines). Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  04:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Help
has felt that it does have enough sources Jasonsocial (talk) 10:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing where that user said that and the article still needs work. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  06:10, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I said it at #wikipedia-en-help on IRC. Personal interpretation of policies matter more than the letter of the policies here.—Eat me, I'm an azuki (talk · contribs · email) 13:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Request on 20:04:55, 16 October 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Andy75015
The article was rejected due to lack of sufficient references. I would appreciate getting further clarifications. Is there a need to add more references in general, or are references missing on specific facts and details. Andy75015 (talk) 20:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC) Andy75015 (talk) 20:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * In a way both, the article could simply use more sources than four. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  20:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

I added 4 more references to reliable sources. Please let me know if this is sufficient. Andy75015 (talk) 14:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

01:02:17, 17 October 2015 review of submission by 12.22.198.26
Hi, thank you for taking the to review my page. I just had a few questions as to why this was declined. I am using reliable sources that are used in mainstream media. All of my links are still live and go to reliable sources. I am not sure what you consider reliable, but all the sources are verified news, radio, or internet publications. I'm not sure if I am sourcing them improperly or if these outlets just don't meet your standards of what you consider "reliable" sources. Thank you for the help, I just really want to get my friends wikipedia page up.
 * The article still needs more sources. SwisterTwister   talk  06:10, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

08:33:49, 17 October 2015 review of submission by Vis ta vie
{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Hello SwisterTwister, thanks for your comment. The article contains links to 12 sources (with one source linking to a PDF with more than 20 newspaper clippings). All are French (or Dutch) as there are the languages where key references are available in. They were all scanned from printed articles from the sixties and seventies. One of the reasons I posted the article is that there is almost no online information on Germaine Brus whereas I found a lot of printed information in that period. I will add some additional English-spoken urls (like Artnet), but these (in comparison) only contain very limited information on the artist.

Best regards, Vis ta vie (talk) 08:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

hello
What is wrong with you man ? Jahn Cernăuți has 10 references ! It is a small club, you can not find more about it ! Look... Romanian ...German wikipedia all have this page with less references. Why English wikipedia can not have it ? --Alexiulian25 (talk) 08:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC) And you do not even know about football, you are out of subject, let people who knows about it to write, and you just accepted.--Alexiulian25 (talk) 08:52, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

09:54:06, 17 October 2015 review of submission by Vilasanath
If you can can make specific suggestions within the text as it stands as to where I can expand 'context' I will be glad to put those changes in place. The context to me is spiritual traditions, and specifically Tantra Yoga. Its significance being expansion of its principles to a Western practitioners.Other references I could give are largely from obscure and often out of print Indian publications, which renders them pretty useless for readers wishing to follow them up. Thanks.

19:59:37, 17 October 2015 review of submission by Ryanbenyo
Hi SwisterTwister,

Thank you so much for taking the time to review my article. I wanted some advice on how I could improve my sources to show that the subject is in fact notable for wikipedia. The page was Kid Pan Alley. It was declined once before and featured half dozen credible sources but I went back in and found another 8 even more credible sources including full features from NPR, Morning Addition, West Hawaii Today (newspaper), Lodinews (paper and TV feature) and news station WDBJ7. These aren't just mentions but rather full features. It even includes sources to each award they've been nominated for and won from those respective organizations. I also made all the correction that were asked of me after the first review. The article is carefully linked to other wikipedia pages (and hopefully visa versa once approved) and I've carefully read the examples of what is considered notable and what is not and I can seem to figure out how to get this article accepted.

How can an organization who receives so much coverage, been around so long, and impacted so many lives be something that isn't considered notable? I understand that wikipedia isn't an encyclopedia of everything that exists, but even some of their newer, smaller, partner organizations (ways I came to learn about them) have wikipedia pages with little to no sources (and I know, that's not a fair claim) but I just want to get to the bottom of what I can do to have this article published. Thank you kindly!

07:40:42, 19 October 2015 review of submission by Editandsave
Dear SwisterTwister, Thank you so much for reviewing my article about an India film director. "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Gaurav_Narayanan&redirect=no". As per your review comment I have added notable primary source references now. Kidnly review the same and guide me if it still does not meet wiki criteria. I hope and wish that the article to be approved this time. Fingers crossed. Thanks again for the review time. Cheers, Editandsave (talk) 11:26, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Editandsave


 * Add any more available sources. SwisterTwister   talk  06:10, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Dear SwisterTwister, Thank you for the reply. I have referenced the official announcement and release links about his projects. References for the reviews and award as well. Can you please point me what exactly the available source means?

I have updated one reference link that had broken link. Kindly check and guide me if I miss something more. Thank you so much. Editandsave (talk) 05:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Editandsave

Dear SwisterTwister, Cited references through WIKI refToolbar template and added subject image from internet for notability. Changed the content format as well. Kindly check and let me know if the articles meets WIKI criteria now. Tahnk you for the same. Editandsave (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Editandsave

October 18 Crystal Yates page deletion
Hi there, thanks for your looking over the page I created. I'm curious as to why it was declined/rejected when I have many many notable sources cited, and other current articles such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennie_Lee_Riddle only has 2 sources, one is the Texas birth records and the other is a bio on her website, and it's still active? Can you give me some more insight? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willmuzik (talk • contribs) 06:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello, the article still needs any more available sources and, yes, even Jennie Lee Riddle will need some but that one article will be safe from deletion because it has chartings and awards. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  06:09, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft Batman: Detective No.27
Hi, I created the page Draft:Batman: Detective No. 27 as I found a {Batman: Detective No. 27 (page does not exist)} red colored link within the List of Elseworlds publications page. This being my first article I consulted the "Edit source" section of some other pages which were blue colored links within the List of Elseworlds publications page like Batman: Two Faces, Batman: Nine Lives etc. I referenced the DC Comics website article (first-party source) and the Grand Comics Database (third-party source) in the reference list. As I thought listing the others references ,ie, the Comic Book Database (third-party source) and the DC Comics Database (third-party source) entries would be redundant I moved them to the external links section along with the previously mentioned references.

Correct me if I am wrong to think that third-party sources are considered reliable sources. It would also help me immensely if I get any kind of replies as to what I am doing incorrectly since I did not get one from the user who denied my previous submission. Thanking you in anticipation.

Ananda.mondal.cal (talk) 09:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The article looks good and acceptable and also likely satisfies Books notability but still could use any more available sources. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  16:55, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

18:22:52, 19 October 2015 review of submission by Ryanbenyo
Hi SwisterTwister,

Thanks for your comment suggesting I provide more sources to show coverage. I added two more, one from Shore News Today and Voice Of America--both full feature articles about Kid Pan Alley.

I also wanted to mention that I've discussed the article in the help chat to see other ways I could improve it in general as well as it's notability where a few people have suggested I let you know that the subject is notable because it's received (as sourced) "national coverage on NPR, national coverage on Voice of America and won a Parent's Choice Award and a received a Grammy nomination"

Please let me know if this fixes the issues regarding notability. Thank you.Ryanbenyo (talk) 20:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

You are...
like my personal patroller, lol :) --Damián A. Fernández Beanato (talk) 21:07, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

23:37:43, 19 October 2015 review of submission by Zoziac
Could you please explain in more detail why the sources fail to achieve notability? I asked a few people in the online chat help and they said that its possible that you were using this standard reason language but it was actually something else / more subtle? I actually spoke live to the initial rejector shortly after the first time, I collected more sources and he seemed to agree that the ones I added would be sufficient. And just now i checked again and was told that the NYT and New Yorker articles were substantial and good sources. Should i remove ones that only mention in passing? Do you think that the wired one talks only about the book? Do you not feel like the information in the article links to the sources?

I think that the two in depth articles (NYT and new yorker) along with the twice nominated for james beard awards (highest award in the field) should be enough to establish notability. Is the rejection actually due to notability concerns or more due to cleanup and organization?

Thanks

Zoziac (talk) 23:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Jeralean Talley
I wonder if you would reconsider your speedy close of Articles for deletion/Jeralean Talley. If you look at WikiProject World's Oldest People/Article alerts, you'll see the first supercentarian listings were all deleted very clearly but the more recent discussions have a ton of keeps up front with an actual discussion afterwards (see Articles for deletion/Augusta Holtz, Articles for deletion/Marie Bernátková and Articles for deletion/Augustine Tessier amongst others for example of the World's Oldest person not being sufficient in and of itself which is what the keeps all just said). There's a number of WP:SPAs on that topic, all of whom vote keep because they claim being the world's oldest person (or things like World's Oldest Nun or World's Oldest Jewish person or whatever) is sufficient even though it's not clearly that way. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:43, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Writing an article about Wikipedia Hoaxes
Hello,

My name is Kim Renfro, and I'm a digital culture reporter for Tech Insider. I wasn't sure the best way to reach out, so here I am. Would you be interested in speaking to me about how you uncovered/removed the Jack Robichaux (fictional 19th-century serial rapist in New Orleans) page? I'm really interested to learn more about your work as a Wikipedia user. My email address is krenfro@techinsider.io. Thank you! Kimrrenfro (talk) 18:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC) Kim

Jeff Nicholson page
Thanks for the review. I think this article is nearly there. Can you give me some less general and more specific constructive editing on which statements lack the strong references, and if we could cut them it would be a sound article? If this isn’t in your bandwidth, can you advise how to get this editing support from other wiki editors or sponsors? It seems like the system is a pass/fail. I’ve done considerable editing after the last fail. How can I get more constructive editing to achieve a good article rather than a fail? Thank you very much for your time.

VanceJordan (talk) 22:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * , Well to start is the fact most of the references are simply supported by the external links and the article could use heavier sources such as news and magazine rather than interviews and such. The article looks good overall but still needs this better sourcing work. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  22:24, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome!
<3 Not So Dumb Blond (talk) 01:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chittagong Madar Bari (2nd nomination)
You are invited to join the discussion at Articles for deletion/Chittagong Madar Bari (2nd nomination). Thanks. Worldbruce (talk) 07:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

About deletion sorting
Hi, I notice you do a lot of deletion sorting so I just want to let you know that WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disability was created recently. Thanks Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Casey McKee
A note on my talk page would have been nice instead of just reverting my close. Or even bringing it to DRV. Whatever. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

OK, I don't get what you're doing here, but I just realized that you were the person who nominated this, and not only did you revert my close, you also reverted another admin's as well. You've been blocked from editing for 3 hours to give you a chance to cool down and consider your actions. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * , I strongly suggest you rethink this because I was not malicious at all and simply wanted a better consensus therefore there's no urgent need for this. As you may notice, I've been ever so constructive at AfD so this is completely unnecessary for an experienced user. I also hope you're not taking this sensitively because as it is I've been tired of the drama here and have been considering retirement. At best, you should've also considered mentioning NPASR (speedy renomination due to the few comments). Not to mention, I removed 's close because he had not even noticed it was relisted.
 * There's also no need for me to cool down because I removed the first relist and removed the second with specific comment to Sandstein. In that case, I would've also appreciated letting me know you considered closing it so I could mention relisting again. I also think it's inappropriate in that case for you to be the one to block me and I don't get why I couldn't have relisted that. Actually, I was almost going to send you a WikiCookie note about this, Roy. FWIW, I simply want to mention I have had nothing but hate comments today and while I trying to at least enjoy my birthday meal today while also dealing with drama here, I get this ridiculous block. Thank you that, no wonder Wikipedia are leaving by the moment when they get worse and worse drama here. I would also appreciated you talking about this further before making aa bold block. What are your comments about this?  SwisterTwister   talk  21:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Can you email me? I'd like to chat with you offwiki. SwisterTwister   talk  21:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I wanted to ping my colleagues for comment and I would like an admin review because I feel RoySmith has acted in spite with this block without even notifying me of something as serious as a bold block.  SwisterTwister   talk  21:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * This block seems excessive to me. Would you agree to stop any reverts to the related AfD if unblocked?-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * That's exactly what I thought. Thanks for commenting BTW,  (I thought of pinging you but wasn't sure if you were around) and the answer to your question is yes and it would be nice if that AfD got a consensus. There is no need to block a veteran user for assuming good faith, hoping to relist for a consensus. It's also worth noting I have no malicious AfD history so there is no need to assume any.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm sure if at any point you had been warned that you would be blocked you would have stopped reverting, but we'll never know. What you have done is agree to discuss your concerns with the close as opposed to reverting and that makes the "cool down" block moot. I've unblocked the account. Let me know if there are any residual autoblock issues.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Well you certainly should not have reverted an admin closing an AfD that you started, let alone reverting two of them after the first one told you not to. That is disruptive editing. I would suggest that SwisterTwister commit to not doing this again, at which point the block will no longer be necessary.  Hut 8.5  22:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * As such, I think this AfD should be reopened and relisted again as I had initiated as there is no urgent need to keep that closed and cause more work nominating again. SwisterTwister   talk  22:18, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * sigh* Thank you so much, that has certainly alleviated my sufficiently stressful day as it is, not to mention making my birthday meal more enjoyable. And definitely yes to talking about this before making an inappropately bold block.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:21, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, SwisterTwister. You seem to be all worked up about how other people's actions were inappropriate, but I think you need to take a step back and look at your own. There's lots of things you can do if you disagree with how an AfD is closed. Contacting the closer on their talk page is pretty much the first thing that should pop into your mind. Opening a DRV might be another (although, you're likely to get pointed questions there about why you didn't try option #1 first). Taking things into your own hands and reverting the close isn't even on the list, but I gave you a freebie on that one. Where things really got out of hand is when another admin came along, re-closed the AfD, and you then reverted that close as well. You've been around long enough to know that's just not how things are done. You mention above that you've have had nothing but hate comments today. You might want to reflect on what's going on to cause people to send such comments in your direction. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Mail
 Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 23:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

R Nandakumar article for creation
Thanks a lot SwisterTwister. As per your suggestion, I have added works of R. Nandakumar with source (publication details and available online links). If you have more suggestions, do inform. Thank you once again. Tirutirutiru (talk) 06:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Rexnord Wikipedia Page Review
Thank you for reviewing the Rexnord page! Could you please explain the best way/advice for providing sufficient sources? For example, I have 17 references at the bottom of the page, with only one going directly to the Rexnord website. The others are independent news sources. What can I provide in order for my page to be approved? Any advice much appreciated.

Emily.white89 (talk) 20:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Please help me to create this wikipage! It keeps getting rejected even after I used the suggested template.
Version One Ventures page. Any suggestions or edits you can help me apply?

Johnsonclaire770 (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

01:01:22, 22 October 2015 review of submission by 189.202.87.41
You claimed "the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Search Internet Optimization instead". Search Internet Optimization is the name of the article written yet you claim I can find it as that same title. This is clearly flase as a quick wikipedia search will show you no such article exists. Please either clarify what you meant or provide a valid reason for why the article was not approved.

Request on 01:55:17, 22 October 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Graffitihistory
Hello. Thanks for looking. Did you make any edits to the page? site seems to indicate that my draft is the most recent edit but a lot of the in-line citations that I added recently are missing. Perhaps I lost a version by failing to save or something... anyway... I have cited a number of reputable sources. I'm just learning the ways of wikipedia. Can you please help me understand which facts need more citations or better citations? I had left out any site that dealt with the subject commercially but then I was told I could use those sites for sources on simple, non-controversioal facts so I put some in... I could probably link to archive.com pages also. Is that allowed? I am motivated to contribute because I happen to posses a wealth of info on an obscure but important subject. Expert help would be greatly appreciated.

I could really use some help with the layout & infobox. I've acquired some fair-use images I can add also.

Graffitihistory (talk) 01:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the tea
Oooh, lovely - just the thing on a crisp fall night. I shall enjoy it with great gusto. Many thanks, and happy editing! -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

08:46:20, 22 October 2015 review of submission by Sandra Buholzer
The subject has notabilty as an actor.

Hello, please could you advise on changes to make. The subject is not a minor actor and non of the roles are background. All of the television appearances have been broadcast on the main terrestrial channels in the UK, Germany and US. Many of the television appearances have been leading guest roles, with him playing the titular role in TATORT: DER TOTE CHINESE. Should all this information be also included in the career section? Your advice is much appreciated. Thanks

Relisting AfD
I just saw the history of WP:Articles for deletion/Casey McKee. I'd like to point out that the nominator of an article at AfD is not supposed to relist the same discussion. Relisting is one of several possible actions to be taken by a closer-to-be after assessing consensus as it stands at the time, and the nominator or any other participant can not do that, see WP:RELIST. Also, participants must not undo AfD closures, and non-admins are not supposed to revert admin closures anyway (RoySmith is an admin). Kraxler (talk) 09:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I noticed that you twice reverted an administrator's closure, including mine, of that AfD which you yourself started. That is disruptive editing - it is an administrator's job to close AfDs, not an involved editor's job. If you disagree with a closure, you may contest it at WP:DRV. If I see you doing something like that again, I will block you for considerably longer than three hours.  Sandstein   11:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry to pile on but as someone who follows IAR on a daily basis even I wouldn't revert 2 admins (I wouldn't even revert 1!), I've more than once disagreed with AFD outcomes but at the end of the day you accept it and move on .... There's no point reverting everyone as it'll lead to blocks and to be totally honest you were extremely lucky to get away with a 3 hour block!, Anyway put it all behind you and move on! :) – Davey 2010 Talk 11:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Steve McCormick (executive) improvements
Thanks SwisterTwister for helping incorporate Steve_McCormick_(executive) into Wikipedia! The page was assessed as Start-Class. Are there any specific suggestions? I am happy to work to make it better! Econohammer (talk) 15:44, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Every time I have my afternoon cup of tea, I enjoy watching a little cutie very similar to this one. Cheers!

DVdm (talk) 18:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>

Re: A cup of tea for you!
Thank you very much. Although it's spring here, a cup of tea is always welcome. E. Feld talk 18:46, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * What's with all of the tea, are you thinking about an RfA? Liz  <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;"><b style="color:#006400;">Read!</b> <b style="color:#006400;">Talk!</b> 22:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Haha, quite the opposite actually (hoping to cause some cheer across Wiki rather than the drama) and this actually related to the email I'm going to send (I swear I sent it so it must've been a system malfunction). SwisterTwister   talk  22:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, since many user talk page messages are complaints, it's always nice to get a positive one. Liz  <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;"><b style="color:#006400;">Read!</b> <b style="color:#006400;">Talk!</b> 23:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  01:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Ambulatory_Glucose_Profile_(AGP) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Tea
Thank you for the tea! I hope my comment wasn't too aggressive to you. There's been a lot of AFDs on oldest people articles and those articles have had a sock and meat puppet farm for over a decade on them. That's why there's ARBCOM restrictions on the subject. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reviewing the article I've been working on. And thanks for the pointers. EH25 (talk) 10:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Stanley Silverman
Hi there,

Thanks for your feedback on the Stanley Silverman draft page. Could you please be more specific about the references not 'being what they could be'? I have used a broad range of online sources to reference my facts so I'm not sure what more I should be looking for right now. Happy to do it of course but would like a little guidance on where they can be improved.

Thanks so much, Devushkao (talk) 16:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)PK

18:56:41, 23 October 2015 review of submission by Sahni.sartaj
Can you be more explicit about what is needed to get approval? Thanks.
 * Exactly what I said there, it needs any more available sources and it's better if the URL links are clickable. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  19:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

22:12:20, 23 October 2015 review of submission by BioWriter818
Hi,

Thank you for your feedback! I have a question for you: a lot of the references we have for Maralou's information are in articles published back in the 1940s-1960s, which of course aren't readily available online but we do have the hard copy clippings. Is that not adequate enough for Wikipedia? If these articles were scanned and uploaded, would that work?

If this isn't an option, would it help if I edited and shortened the article down so that just the information that can be referenced is written? There are several online articles from the Los Angeles Times dating back to the 1980s where she is mentioned and quoted, and that is a verifiable source.

Thank you! BioWriter818 (talk) 22:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)BioWriter818

Autopatrolled

 * Hi, how I can become Autopatrolled, can you help me ? Kurdistantolive (talk) 03:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * See WP:Autopatrolled and afterwards, Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled. I'm one myself and a NPP so it is useful. SwisterTwister   talk  03:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

 * I need some help in Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
 * Thank you
 * Kurdistantolive (talk) 16:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

not notable?
Read the posts - including Under Secretary General of the UN, and a number of other positions any of which on their own officially are covered by the notability guidelines. Collect (talk) 18:42, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

inre: Articles for deletion/Christopher Burnham
WP:BEFORE finds the man spoken of in detail in numerous reliable sources here and here. Either the UN-published source is complete fantasy or the nominator simply thinks so. Which do you think? Care to give your delete a reconsideration? Cheers.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Help! Articles for deletion/Ossett_Town_Ladies_FC
Hi SwisterTwister. You mentioned that you feel the article should be deleted until there is better improvement. Would you be able to advise where, in your opinion, the article could be improved? I wasn't sure if notability simply extended to media coverage (of which has been referenced) or if there were other examples that could be given. Best wishes -- Minnowfire (talk) 21:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello
Hello David, can you examine the page Internet Horror Movie Database and the sources and to add your vote on the AfD page? Thanks Pizzole (talk) 00:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Mesfer Al-Qahtani
You noted the article is an orphan, however it is linked from 2005 FIFA Club World Championship squads (though perhaps wasn't when you searched previously because of a spelling difference - however that was fixed before the AFD started). Also I've added references to the article that I think demonstrate the subject's notability under WP:NFOOTBALL. Nfitz (talk) 01:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think editors should be expected to be fluent in Arabic, can you find any English sources? Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 01:21, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, this English source does indicate that he played for Ittihad FC in the 2005 FIFA Club World Championship entering in the 69th minute - http://www.fifa.com/clubworldcup/matches/round=47350500/match=47350006/index.html
 * If you click on his name, it goes to his FIFA player record - http://www.fifa.com/fifa-tournaments/players-coaches/people=197986/index.html which was added to the article by User:Jogurney in a June 2010 edit. Nfitz (talk) 01:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I came across another English sources. Here's a reference to his March 25th 2003 goal for Ittihad FC in a league match over Al-Riyadh SC (which was later relegated). Nfitz (talk) 02:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Eugenio B. Bito-onon Jr.
Hi, thanks for reviewing this article. I reviewed the notability guidelines for politicians, and I believe that the person in question does qualify. Although he doesn't hold a high-level position (#1), I believe that he does easily pass #2. I believe that he also passes "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article" (#3). I doubt there's another mayor from the Philippines that's been interviewed internationally as often as Bito-onon, so I disagree with your assessment that the person lacks notability. I was thinking of placing this draft up for discussion at Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard, but it appears that another user was criticized for taking notability claims to that board, so where should I post this if I want to have others discuss the notability of this article? Thanks! Fraenir (talk) 04:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft: Spireon
Hi SwisterTwister, thank you for your comments in regards to the Draft:Spireon. Can you let me know how many more sources should be added for the approval of this article?

Thanks.

Lambao.truong (talk) 16:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * However many there are available. SwisterTwister   talk  16:20, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Help with AfD nomination?
I created Articles for deletion/Vic Piano to nominate that page for deletion, but it seems not to have appeared in the log Articles_for_deletion/Log/2015_October_26, although I believe I correctly followed the steps. What did I do wrong? David.thompson.esq (talk) 18:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction
I noticed that you recently accepted this draft article and moved it into article space. If I recall correctly, this topic has been a source of heated debate and intense POV pushing in the recent past and it was the subject of an AFD: Articles for deletion/Post-SSRI sexual dysfunction. It appears to me that the re-creation of this article through AFC is an attempt to get around the AFD result. In fact, it may even qualify for speedy deletion per WP:CSD because it is a copy of the article that was discussed at AFD. Deli nk (talk) 19:47, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Paine Ellsworth. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Marie Celeste, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Pleasant pathways, <b style="font-size:85%;color:darkblue;font-family:Segoe Script">Painius</b> 21:15, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Regarding my page creation
Hello,

I would like you to take a look at the page you had reviewed before. I added more sources and I think it's ready now.

Here's the link again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Youssef_El_Deeb

Would appreciate if you could review and let me know

Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hebaseham (talk • contribs) 08:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Pinging users to AfD discussions
I notice that you sometimes ping users to AfD discussions. Why did you ping Davey2010 to Articles for deletion/Kate Elizabeth Hallam? The user has not contributed to the article. You may want to read up on WP:CANVASSING in the event you're not aware of this guideline page, as such pings could be interpreted as such depending on the context of the situation, particularly if it's likely that the user will agree with your commentary at the discussion. North America1000 12:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * - Well the ping failed anyway so had no idea until just now, I was pinged before by ST but assumed I edited the article .. So perhaps I never did!?, Anyway ST NA1k's correct - You shouldn't be pinging everyone unless they've participated in the previous AFD (That's the limit as far as I know). Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 12:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Another - I, along with few other editors who work in India-related articles, received a ping regarding an old Bollywood film AfD (non of us had edited the article prior to this and we differ in our ways and views of editing here). I don't find that to be wrong, but actually helpful. At AfDs, any insight from editors who work around that specific area is pretty helpful. That's what Dave was trying to do in my understanding. Not to get editors to agree to his commentary but for the article to be reviewed by a few extra pair of eyes. Best,  Yash!  13:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, that is accurate and the more clearer comments at AfD, the merrier. I wasn't sure if to ping you but I know you're interested with that subject if you know what I mean.  SwisterTwister   talk  17:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh ... well thanks :), Unfortunately it can be perceived as canvassing but meh I'm not all that fussed - I guess if you were canvassing you'd be pinging half of the site, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Provide rationale

 * Hi SwisterTwister: You should consider providing reasons in AfD nominations when you ping those that you consider to be "interested users". For example, at the AfD discussion, for Megatrax Production Music, User:Walter Görlitz stated "...I don't know why I was summoned". This comes across as a potential canvassing matter, because it could be interpreted that you may ping users that may agree with your opinion. North America1000 14:45, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

00:40:55, 28 October 2015 review of submission by Andazuma
Thanks Twister… Please see revised.

03:21:14, 28 October 2015 review of submission by Boatswi
Ok, I updated this page with more information.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjay Asthana has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Sanjay Asthana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  06:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Sanjay_Asthana help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm JamesChen2003. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Political positions of Ben Carson, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. JamesChen2003 (talk) 16:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

A kitten on patrol
Thanks for patrolling my article, I appreciate it!

Zamorakphat (talk) 04:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>

The subject is not yet properly Studied understand it please
Draft:Hagalavadi What I have submitted the articles are not yet properly studied and there are studied materials but they are in different old Universities' library. But Now I am not able access them.My articles is going on rejections but my article elements are absolutely true and I have taken the sources from some less stable links,but you are not understanding. you are going on rejection.Give me the guidence What I will make?

Nina Kossman article
Hello,

You commented that you are not sure about Nina Kissman's article. Can you say why?

Thank you.

NorieNC (talk) 03:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC) NorieNC --NorieNC NorieNC (talk) 03:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

07:47:08, 30 October 2015 review of submission by 129.16.140.94
Hi,

You reviewed my page on the Gothenburg Award for Sustainable Development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gothenburg_Award_for_Sustainable_Development and declined it since it needs more sources. I have 14 different independent sources which are NOT from the Award's own site. Examples are: Kofi Annan Foundation (no 11) and Lund University (no 17). I don't know what more to do! Is that really not enough? I see so many different pages with much less sources. Please advise.

Best regards,

Rebecka

08:30:46, 30 October 2015 review of submission by Guriromtveit
Could you be more specific as to where sources are missing? Thanks!

Declined Article
Hello Sister Twister, I see that you declined my article (Draft:First Order (Star Wars). Thank you for leaving feadback but I need help. How can I make my article "solid" and "have independent notability"? JLanzer (talk) 10:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Declined Article
Hi SwisterTwister,

You reviewed my page about Tino Sanandaji https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tino_Sanandaji and declined it since it needs more sources that show he is a notable person. I have 16 sources. Tino is a highly notable person in Sweden.

He already has a swedish wikipedia site at https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tino_Sanandaji

I don't know what more to do. Is that really not enough? I see so many different pages with much less sources. Please advise. Could you be more specific or maybe help update the page?

Kind regards,

Knut

Talkback
North America1000 14:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Football articles
Enrique Zschuschen meets WP:NFOOTBALL as he was an international player, needs improving though; I have PRODded the other two though as they appear to be non-notable. GiantSnowman 16:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Kenneth Mahood proposed article and the Golden Rule.
I'm aware of Wikipedia's guidelines for notability and the need for secondary sources which show it.

Regarding your request
 * "Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia," and your advice to consult WP:Golden Rule, I did so.

Before resubmitting the article, I added several secondary sources which do what you ask:

Reference 1 is a summary of Kenneth Mahood's career published by the British Cartoon Archive, an activity supported by the British Arts and Humanities Research Council. While insufficient on its own to establish the notability of Kenneth Mahood, this article is a secondary source not written or supported by the "topic." It meets the criteria set forth in your and PrimeFac's requests and WP:Golden Rule.

In fact, not a single one of my sources has any direct, primary source relationship to the article's subject.
 * Each reference is third-party, and when they are advertisements, these are either auction pages in which the author's notability is assumed (for very few people bid on obscure or unimportant artists without the sort of build-up that is absent in these web references - these are auctions "banking" on Mahood being not only notable but having been well-known during his heyday), or reproductions of Mahood's work for the very notable New Yorker magazine which won acclaim. One such reference listed Mahood's work being selected as one of the hundred best cartoons published in an 80-year period by the New Yorker.
 * Each reference links to a live, verifiable external Web page unconnected to Kenneth Mahood personally with one exception, the notice in his employer from 1971-2008, the Daily Mail announcing his retirement from the newspaper and detailing his years of service as one of the Daily Mail`s premier cartoonists during that period.

Reference 2 is a review of Mahood's book Name Droppings by critic Win Wiacek in which Mahood's notability was discussed in paragraph one:
 * "Another prolific but criminally all-but forgotten staple of British cartooning is Kenneth Mahood, whose darkly dry and merrily mordant panel gags were a mainstay of humour mags, cartoon-book racks and newspapers from 1949 to the end of the 1980s."

Reference 3 is still another secondary source stating that Mahood worked in collage and his work was exhibited in New York and Dublin.

Reference 4 is Blouin Art Info International's Web page on Kenneth Mahood by a third party describing how his art has sold from 2001 - 2009. I submit that significant sales volume of an artist on the world market is evidence of his notability - people have recognized Mahood, respect his artistic ability, and purchased his art.

Reference 5 is a collection of cartoons published by Kenneth Mahood by the renowned British humor magazine Punch (magazine) over many years, evidence that Mahood enjoyed popularity during that time as evidenced by his continued appearance in a very popular humor magazine with an international readership.

Reference 6 is another third-party online collection of Kenneth Mahood's work for Punch (magazine) listing two covers of Punch done by Mahood with the sidebar note:


 * "Punch Cartoons
 * Original Punch magazine front covers from the 1950s and 1960s by some of the finest cartoonists and illustrators of their day."

indicating this was a description of Mahood during the time he contributed to Punch.

I should have preceded Reference 7 - the secondary source citation describing what the "Punch Table" is as a way of establishing why Mahood's election to it further establishes his notability with a citation of Reference 1, which tells us he was elected to the Punch Table - a signal honor bestowed by Britain's premier humor magazine at the time Mahood worked there, and strong evidence of his notability. I have corrected this error now.

Reference 8 is a tribute by the Daily Mail to Kenneth Mahood on his retirement from that publication, detailing his contributions to the magazine and his prowess as a cartoonist and artist. I think it's supporting evidence of Mahood's notability, specifically:
 * "Ken Mahood, our brilliant, award-winning pocket cartoonist, is leaving the Mail after more than 27 years of entertaining readers with his wit, satire and sharp comment on the news of the day"

and
 * "In 1966, Mahood became the first-ever political cartoonist on The Times" -

two indications that Kenneth Mahood was extremely notable as cartoonists go.

Reference 9 is a blog entry by artist Shelley Davies showing more Punch covers done by Kenneth Mahood, and also collages of his on exhibit at the time at Whyte's Gallery, more evidence of his notability during his career at Punch and his more recent notability as an artist exhibiting at Whyte's Gallery.

References 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 establish more of the body of Mahood's work - covers for the New Yorker magazine this time - and the current commercial demand for copies of previously published work of Kenneth Mahood.

Reference 15 is a notice of the Wiley publishing house's release of a collection of the 100 best cartoons published by the New Yorker - a magazine of international renown and large circulation - in which Kenneth Mahood's work is featured. This establishes Kenneth Mahood's recognition and notability as a notable cartoonist in a very competitive field.

References 16 and 17 establish Kenneth Mahood's status as a published author. Reference 17 was cited earlier as a critic's recognition as a very popular cartoonist from 1949 to the late 1980s.

I'm having difficulty understanding why these secondary articles and other supporting references not directly associated with the subject of the article (he never wrote any of them, he doesn't stand to benefit from any of the advertisements of his work I listed - instead, these are amazon.com and other online resellers advertising the work of a notable, acclaimed cartoonist, artist and published author, but without any authorization or other direct connection to Kenneth Mahood himself) aren't enough documentation of Kenneth Mahood's notability.

Looking around wikipedia, it seems to me that the criteria in WP:Golden Rule were met completely. Thousands of our articles on other topics are nowhere near this well-sourced. I invite your discussion on this topic. loupgarous (talk) 22:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * For your information, I've also added citations for the section "Books by Kenneth Mahood" - information on each book listed is sourced. loupgarous (talk) 23:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:AUTHOR as well. I think my sources meet those specific criteria. loupgarous (talk) 23:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rubin & Chapelle has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Rubin & Chapelle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  04:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Rubin_%26_Chapelle help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

11:27:31, 31 October 2015 review of submission by Mrr2015
This is my first article submission, but it is not my creation. It is a simple translation of the Jan Rejsa page that already exists on the Czech-language Wikipedia site, so the article has of course already been accepted there.

I am curious as to why the change to English would then require more sources? Also, since many of the sources are libraries and catalogs, it wouldn't seem more were needed (existence is verified). Perhaps if you could tell me what you would like to see better sourced I could work on that?

Thank you,

Mrr2015 (talk) 11:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

I am perplexed
I just looked at Category:Pending AfC submissions in article space and fund several that you have accepted in there, but cannot see why. I will bet you can;t either. Since you use the script I have no clue what is happening. This is just fyi. Fiddle  Faddle  12:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Bob Hardwick (and the cup of tea for me)
Hello, SwisterTwister, and thank you for the tea; I was honored to be included in the selection of editors you recently recognized with WikiLove. I am reposting the question I asked you two weeks ago, because it was archived without being addressed. — GrammarFascist  contribs talk 13:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm trying to help a new editor who came to the Teahouse looking for direction on improving Draft:Bob Hardwick so that it can pass AfC review. However, I myself am not clear on why the submission was declined. There are three references cited which are from reliable sources and constitute more than mere mentions of Hardwick and his band; and they have performed at a notable event, namely the Obama inauguration, which seems to satisfy another of the specific music-related notability criteria. (Apparently the band also played the Kentucky Derby, per cited sources, though that isn't mentioned in the article as yet; I'm not sure whether performing at that event would also contribute towards notability.) Could you explain why the cited sources do not establish Hardwick's notability, and/or specify what kind of sources or other proofs of notability would be sufficient? Thanks in advance, GrammarFascist contribstalk 19:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey GF, the article looks good frankly but I also wonder if the amount of sourcing could be enhanced to at least include any more available ones. SwisterTwister   talk  17:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi ST, thanks for clarifying. There didn't seem to be much in recent Google News results but plenty turned up in scanned older newspapers. I added two minor sources and one meaty one (Palm Beach Daily News) and some content I pulled from those sources, and re-submitted the article. I'm willing to add more sources if you would like; finding them isn't the issue so much as finding the time to do the edits adding them into the article. Thanks again! — GrammarFascist  contribs talk 18:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Still it the subject of less studied topic
It is still the less studied subject thatswhy I am not providing you the references sufficiently.I would like to ask you to publish this article for the guidelines of public please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.15.85.40 (talk) 15:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

20:33:13, 31 October 2015 review of submission by Esmenkah
Hello, I just added some references to show verifiability of the award recipients. Is that enough please?

Thank you.

20:35:45, 31 October 2015 review of submission by Esmenkah
Hello, I just added some references to show verifiability of the award recipients. Is that enough please?

Thank you. Esmenkah (talk) 20:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

01:55:03, 1 November 2015 review of submission by Wendell Smith
Dear Twister, Thanks you for your review and feedback. Would it be possible to accept the article on Ramon Guthrie as I have recently edited it (I struck out the time line and left just the introduction and bibliography and added a few additional references) until such time as I can compose a suitable biography? I have written both Sally M. Gall and Michael Brazillier at Persea Books about using the biographic note that Sally wrote for Maximum Security Ward and Other Poems. I have yet to hear from Michael; Sally seems amenable to this plan, but she will not be back in the country and able to deal with the issue in detail until after November 20. Would it be possible to use her work then? If you need to see what that would be, I have a copy of it in WORD that I could past in here. Although I am contemplating writing a biography of Guthrie, using, or leaning heavily on Sally's work would be what I would like to do at this time. In the meantime could we go with the minimal article as it now stands?

Sincerely yours,Wendell Smith (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Wendell Smith Wendell Smith (talk) 01:55, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Wendell Smith

Articles for creation: International Project Management Association
@SwisterTwister. Dear David, I am attempting to create a page on the IPMA. I understand the requirements (read the entire wikipedia help section on notable, incl. golden rules etc). In my 4 attempts of getting the article approved, I have every time added external references from either books (not from IPMA but from external studies), newspapers or professional journals, 3rd parties newspaper (2nd rejection directed to do so) as well as notable organisations who are using the IPMA for improving their operations. Some of the Wiki link I created contains reference of IPMA as well (and I am trying to fill the gap to the missing article). I am writing to you so you can help me better understand what I am missing. Maybe you could help me understand first me why the references I mentioned above are not considered to support the guideline for "notability". I would also very much appreciate to understand the review process which would help me understand how the article is been reviewed so that I can complete it adequately. Many thanks in advance. Cedrik Cznal (talk) 07:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * As I said at the draft, the article looks good but could still use any more available sources. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  07:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, I was just going to write back (only noticed the comment, still learning), so I need more external references basically. ok. I'll add more. Thanks. Cznal (talk) 07:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your rejection of the Yannis Tseklenis article
I read your advice / suggestion ,thank you. I see your point. The problem is my subject (the person ) was internationally famous mainly during the 1960s and 70, and although there were many articles written about him in the international press of the time, this was the pre - Internet era  so I cannot link to any of these as references as they are not online. What do I do in such cases? Akouzi (talk) 08:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Rejected article
Thank you for the suggestion. I see your point, but my subject was internationally famous mainly during the 1960s and 70s, and all international press coverage about him from that time is not available online. What do I do in such a situation? (Akouzi (talk) 08:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)) Akouzi (talk) 08:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Reveiw of submission on Iuventum by Rudraaksh24
Why has the article been declined? Rudraaksh24 (talk) 10:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Rejected article on Obsidian Portal
Thank you for taking the time to review the article.

In your feed back you state "This is a start but still needs any more available sources overall." can you please clarify what you mean? I assume this means that more/different references are needed to back up the information already presented? Can you please provide a bit more guidance as to what you feel is lacking?

Best Regards

Nick

NikMak71 (talk) 13:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

02:30:53, 2 November 2015 review of submission by Madisonwalsh1
Hi! How can I improve this page so it can be accepted? You said you want more "available sourcing", what does this mean?

Thanks!!

Madisonwalsh1 (talk) 02:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the tea
I had it with a bit of lemon to match the sourness of other Wikipedia editors and some sugar to match your thoughtfulness. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Request on 08:56:41, 2 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by AsmithHull1993
I don;t understand what you mean re. my recent submission, you have not accepted and given 'add any more available coverage overall' as the reason why, what does that mean?

AsmithHull1993 (talk) 08:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your rejection of the Spottoon article
Hi, I was hoping you could help me further. What do you mean by more available coverage? Do you mean newspaper sources? Thank you for your help!

Syc916 (talk) 09:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

11:05:40, 2 November 2015 review of submission by Prabhat 9
Hello, This is in respect to the article on "Ritu Pathak". I think I have furnished enough information in the article about the personality.I also produced whichever relevant sources were present on the internet.I have included sections relating to her early life,career,discography and even awards & nominations...I was wondering what else needs to be added...!!! Could you please guide me to improve the article so that it can meet the standards...?? Prabhat 9 (talk) 11:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

11:13:42, 2 November 2015 review of submission by Prabhat 9
Hello, This is in respect to the article on "Ritu Pathak". I think I have furnished enough information in the article about the personality.I also produced whichever relevant sources were present on the internet.I have included sections relating to her early life,career,discography and even awards & nominations...I was wondering what else needs to be added...!!! Could you please guide me to improve the article so that it can meet the standards...?? Prabhat 9 (talk) 11:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

14:27:24, 2 November 2015 review of submission by 128.228.143.215
I do not understand why this article is being rejected. It is sourced by a wide variety of media and scholarly outlets. One can find sources of its authors all over the web. In fact, many are well-documented on Wikipedia (including its founders, which are specifically mentioned in the Italian American article).

Rarely does a publisher have many articles on themselves specifically, articles tend to focus on individual publisher's catalog – unless they have been around for 50+ years or are media outlets for giant corporations.

128.228.143.215 (talk) 14:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

15:21:39, 2 November 2015 review of submission by GeekPhotog
Thanks for your note on the DxO ONE draft. I've added references from coverage in WSJ, USA Today, CNET, Verge, Mashable, and a couple others. I think that is what you were asking for, so I've re-submitted.GeekPhotog (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC) Thanks for the prompt re-review. I noted your grading of the page as a Starter (which makes sense) so I'll continue to work to improve it.GeekPhotog (talk) 16:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

16:41:05, 2 November 2015 review of submission by RobertCumming
Hello, thank you for reviewing my article on the Inverse Warburg Effect. Are you simply requesting that I add more references or do you require further explanation in the text?

Thanks,

16:46:00, 2 November 2015 review of submission by Cash1991
Well, I'm not requesting a re-review just yet, I'm just asking for clarification. By 'more available coverage' do you mean I need to find more varied sources or I just need to include more details about the event and how it took place? Or both? Thanks for your assistance!

Request on 16:50:59, 2 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by ObsoleteTruthyness
Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the article I submitted for publication. The feedback you provided is confusing and needs clarification. When it was first submitted and rejected, the reason given was that there weren't enough qualifying and acceptable references. Fair enough. I provided more qualifying and acceptable references. And now it is being rejected because it needs "any more available coverage"...? This does not make any sense and this reason was not provided as a rejection initially. Your feedback is also confusing, which makes an already difficult task even harder. Here is the feedback you provided me:

"This still needs any more available coverage and by the way once the references are listed, there's no need to list all of them under the references section. Cheers,"

Thank you for the tip on not needing to list the references again; I thought it was only listed once but it looks like they may have been duplicated. But thanks for the word of advice anyways.

Please provide me with better, clearer and more comprehensible reasons as to why you are rejecting this article, as the reasons you provided do not seem in line with Wikipedia policy nor do they make any sense.

All the best,

ObsoleteTruthyness (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

17:32:18, 2 November 2015 review of submission by Faradize
I wanted to know if there were clearer reasons as to why the article wasn't accepted.

19:21:38, 2 November 2015 review of submission by Xenith711
Thanks for reviewing the draft in which I submitted and providing comments within. I went ahead and added another 4 notable sources, including Venturebeat, one of the largest tech publications in the gaming space, from the recent week. The company and game recently won a competition in which showcased several other notable gaming companies and should suffice to vouch for the notability of the game Shop Heroes and the company behind it, Cloudcade. Please note that there are also 9 total citations, from a slew of credible websites and sources in which consists of a mix of business, tech and gaming publications. The company and game itself was also recently featured by both Apple and Google Play in their "Top New Games" spot which is not an easy feat in itself. I hope that this additional source and a bit of elaboration on the company itself will prove it to not be promotional but rather to list a notable company/product on Wiki.

12:17:14, 5 November 2015 review of submission by Xenith711
Currently there are only 11 sources that I can find relevant to this post for now, although a lot more of them are available for Shop Heroes which I will create a separate page for. As more sources become available, I will continue to add to the Wiki. Can you please go ahead and approve the draft for publishing now?

Citrix Receiver
Thank you for accepting my draft for the Citrix Receiver entry! As I mentioned in a comment with my submission, I have a screenshot of the product that can be added to the article's infobox. I just uploaded it and you can find it here. Would you be able to add it in? I understand if you don't have time, I just wanted to ask you first, since you created the article. Thanks! Heatherer (talk) 20:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Request on 21:42:31, 2 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Ovidiu.iordache
Hello! Thanks for reviewing the article I want to create. Until now, the article was declined so I would like to make it happen. :) I've added 3 more References to the draft (starting from 1 to 3 - at the top of the References list). I would like to say that the song I'm writing about is sung by a singer who is not a mainstream artist; as we know it is very hard for an artist who's age is over 40 to get mainstream airplay. Although the news regarding the release of the single named "Clipe" was published on various online newspapers, including MTV and also mainstream radio website Radio Zu, the song did not managed to get mainstream airplay. But it was heavily played on the main national channel of The Romanian Radio Broadcasting Company and also on various regional radio stations across the country. Actually the fact that the song was not being played by the mainstream radio stations, it means that the single was not eligible to chart. Anyway, the song is the most popular single released by the singer, since her 2008 Eurovision Song Contest Entry. If you consider these facts strong enough to allow the article on Wikipedia, I would thank you! Bye-Bye!(Ovidiu.iordache (talk) 21:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC))

Ovidiu.iordache (talk) 21:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Request on 06:15:54, 3 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Gayatri.radhakrishnan
<Gayatri.radhakrishnan (talk) 06:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC) Hi Swisstalk, My article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:KAYA_LIMITED was declined. Just was curious to know the exact reason. i mean could you be more specific as to what needs to be changed. Because 2nd time i had changed the tone of the article also had provided references from authoritative sources.

Would appreciate your feedback on the same.

Many Thanks,

Gayathri>

Gayatri.radhakrishnan (talk) 06:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Well for starters the sections "management" (full list of employees are not necessary as this should only go at their website) and "services" are not needed as it gives the article a promotional tone. Second, the article still needs any more available coverage about the company. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  06:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

06:20:09, 3 November 2015 review of submission by Anjmani
He is notable for 2 aspects.

1. SaR operation of Missing Dornier http://tamil.thehindu.com/tamilnadu/புதுச்சேரி-கடற்பகுதியில்-3வது-நாளாக-விமானத்தை-தேடும்-பணி-தீவிரம்/article7308515.ece http://www.vikatan.com/article.php?aid=109417

2. He is an ethical hacker (Hacked Windows 10 Login Screen) http://www.thehindu.com/features/kids/a-selftaught-hacker-tells-us-what-hacking-is-all-about/article7795997.ece Video uploaded by himself: Proof of Concept - Hacking Windows 10 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmpcceM0eV0

09:48:31, 3 November 2015 review of submission by Aung2015
Hi there,

Thanks for the note. I am note sure what you mean by "available coverage overall", would it be possible to clarify please? I will also rework my username which is an issue

thanks!

Mark Rigby - 09:56, 3 November 2015 review of submission by Bobwhale
==

Hello, thanks for your advice regarding my draft for Mark Rigby. I have added further sources to comply with your available coverage comment. I hope this now suffices.

Thanks

Weird
A couple of your recent acceptances via the script arrived as articles with the afc banners intact. In the past this has happened to folk who closed the tab/window too fast and moved on to other work. That might be the reason here, or we might have a script issue. I wonder if you could do a self check a couple of times and see if you can spot what is happening to your acceptances? Fiddle  Faddle  10:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

14:23:16, 3 November 2015 review of submission by Rowenackh
Thanks for the review, but i would like to know what do you mean by having more available coverage? Thanks!

14:49:38, 3 November 2015 review of submission by Thehel84
Hi, I'd just like to know how I could make this a more solid submission in terms of reliable sources. I've linked to newspapers and reviewers as well as other established websites. I've also seen authors on wikipedia that have fewer reliable sources, so I want to make sure I'm not doing anything wrong. I've updated the post with another reliable source for a potential re-review?

Thank you,

Flash Wolves draft
Hi, thanks for looking over the article I made. So my question is what exactly do you mean by "more available coverage overall"? Do you think that the organization doesn't have that much coverage?--Prisencolin (talk) 15:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Eric Wong draft
Hi SwisterTwister! I had the same question as the user above me. I'm working on an article and have referenced every reliable source available on my subject (Billboard, Hollywood Reporter, Boardroom Insiders, Artist Direct). What do you mean by my article needing "more available coverage overall"? Thanks in advance for your help! Hillcoulson (talk) 15:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)hillcoulson (talk)

New Companies delsort category
Hi SwisterTwister: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 16 October 2015 for companies, located at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America1000 16:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

16:19:25, 3 November 2015 review of submission by Pspeck15
What needs to be fixed? I don't understand what notability requirement I missed?

Request on 16:31:12, 3 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Stteve01
I would like more assistance on getting my submission published -- and would like to understand why it was not initially approved. Jorge DeSantiago is a reporter for Telemundo. Network reporters and even local anchors/reporters biographies are published regularly on Wikipedia. For example: ABC's Gio Benitez (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gio_Benitez), Rob Stafford of WMAQ Chicago (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Stafford), Russ Mitchell of WKYC Cleveland (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russ_Mitchell) etc.

It was also noted that I should have viable secondary sources, which I did. I had articles published by WFAA, the largest television station in Texas, and a number of other media sources.

I'd appreciate your help on how to improve my submission. Stteve01 (talk) 16:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Stteve01 (talk) 16:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

16:50:09, 3 November 2015 review of submission by 213.140.17.212
I translated the page directly from its Italian equivalent, (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Palandri_%28scrittore%29) supplying all the information contained therein. The author himself also seemed satisfied with it when I showed him the draft for what it's worth. Basically, seeing as how the reason given for the rejection was a scarcity of information, I figured I should let you know that this is basically all the information available at the moment. I hope that makes things a bit clearer.

Thank you very much!

Request on 16:50:23, 3 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Marilyn Stablein
Marilyn Stablein (talk) 16:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Thanks for your recent review suggestions. I added more links for you to consider. I hope this is the right place to contact you. Cheers, MarilynMarilyn Stablein (talk) 16:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

23:09:32, 3 November 2015 review of submission by Michael R. Albert
I have added more sources, please review it again.

23:53:15, 3 November 2015 review of submission by Sethmasia
Can you please point to a specific line or lines that needs additional citation? We're talking about one man, very well known within his own field and whose work is widely cited, but who has not himself been the subject of a formal biography. Beyond footnotes, I've provided links to many of his published books and articles -- but it would be unrealistic to create links to the roughly 350 magazine issues he edited beginning around 1962.

Thanks for any guidance you can provide.

Seth Masia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sethmasia

23:53:48, 3 November 2015 review of submission by Sethmasia
Can you please point to a specific line or lines that needs additional citation? We're talking about one man, very well known within his own field and whose work is widely cited, but who has not himself been the subject of a formal biography. Beyond footnotes, I've provided links to many of his published books and articles -- but it would be unrealistic to create links to the roughly 350 magazine issues he edited beginning around 1962.

Thanks for any guidance you can provide. Sethmasia (talk) 23:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC) Seth Masia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sethmasia

Article Submission: Churchill Retirement Living
Hi User:SwisterTwister. Thanks for taking the time to review this article, which I submitted recently. You mentioned in the comments that you thought it needs more available coverage overall. I'm keen to improve the article and wanted to understand what you meant. Would you mind perhaps clarifying? Thanks in advance Fbell74 (talk) 02:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

a little slower, please
except for academics, authors, books, or new companies. no entertainers.  DGG ( talk ) 06:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Haha, yes I know, I get enthusiastic and passionate about it especially wanting a consensus and I know you're always around to help comment. I want to thank you again for your efforts recently Dave.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Rejected: Els Vandevorst article
Hi,

You rejected my article on Els Vandevorst. She really is an award winning producer, who's films have even been shortlisted for the Oscars. The IMDB page alone is a pretty solid reference, if you ask me. And I'm pretty sure that makes Vandevorst notable enough to have her own wiki-page. All of the news articles about her are so industry-specific that they feel like a worse source of information then the IMDB page. So what else can I do to make this page more credible?

Thanks in advance. Gertsik (talk) 09:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

10:32:48, 4 November 2015 review of submission by Dizaxdizax
Hello Swister,

Thanks for your review, and I'm happy to hear that I'm almost there. As this is my first attempt at writing an entry, I'm pretty happy with that.

Just wondering though, what kinds of additional info are you referring to? I'm sure it's out there, but I'd be grateful for a couple of pointers so that I can find it and add it.

Many thanks!

D.

articles for deletion
You have pinged me on several occasions to attract my attention to articles in Afd which you believe might be of interest to me. I would prefer that you not do this. It is, perhaps, not quite canvassing but it is IMHO uncomfortably close to it. --<b style="color:red;">Anthony Bradbury</b><sup style="color:black;">"talk" 22:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Well as you may notice Anthony, I only ping when there is not a solidly clear consensus and I mostly ping you for medical articles (considering you're listed as a physician). SwisterTwister   talk  22:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes. Please do not do so. My professional status, which is as stated on my userpage, is not relevant to this request. --<b style="color:red;">Anthony Bradbury</b><sup style="color:black;">"talk" 22:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC)::::Indeed, could I further suggest that unless and until you decide to seek admin status you should assume that admins are themselves in the best position to decide which flagged articles best merit their attention?--<b style="color:red;">Anthony Bradbury</b><sup style="color:black;">"talk"  17:13, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

15:08:54, 4 November 2015 review of submission by Richie.sands
Hi

I am a little confused as to what i need to do as if you look at the following wikipedia entries they have the same number or less references as i have included on my page.

please see

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.london https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.berlin

as this is the first page i have tried to create your advice and opinions would be greatly appreciated.

thanks in advance

Richie.sands (talk) 15:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Request on 15:31:43, 4 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Dotcope
Hello and thank you! What other kind of coverage is necessary? There are multiple reviews of the works she's done but most of those reviews are on blogs by authors etc. Would that suffice or does there need to be more sources cited for the awards? I have read several other Wikipedia pages--Dena Hankins for instance, in which only one source was quoted and the sources quoted on her work were only reviews as Hankins has yet to be nominated for any award and only the reviews on her first book were quoted and that seems to have been sufficient as she has a page up in Wikipedia. So I am a tad confused as to what sources are relevant and so forth. Cheers! Dot Cope

Dotcope (talk) 15:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Request on 16:36:13, 4 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by LG Brichetto
Swister Twister. Thank you for reviewing the article for Parables TV. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Parables_TV). In your comments, you said the article has improved, however you asked for more sources which refer to Parables overall. I can add more sources, but before I do, can you please tell me what you are looking for? I have already added 22 sources with many that fit the Wikipedia guidelines for reliable sources, so I don't want to add more of the same kind if these are not acceptable. Please advise me. Thanks.LG Brichetto (talk) 16:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC) LG Brichetto (talk) 16:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

17:59:47, 4 November 2015 review of submission by MarcoBelvin
Upon your suggestion (you said: "I was actually almost going to accept this but this article could still use any more available coverage about them overall."), I have updated the draft with a substantial number of reliable, secondary and independent references (10) to support notability and justify coverage. I am confident that this draft is ready for publication. Thank you.

Request on 19:07:29, 4 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Joekollege
Hi. I'm writing in reference to the article about Katherine Timpf that you just reviewed. You asked me "Are there any more available sources about her and her work overall?" I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for here. There are many other sources about her, but previous Wikipedia reviewers told me not to go overboard on my citations. There are many, many Fox News videos on the Internet that Katherine appears in. She has written many, many articles and columns. How many more sources do I need? I've seen a number of approved Wikipedia articles that have fewer sources than I'm citing (e.g., Katie Pavlich). Katherine is an on-air television personality who has a large following. She is an on-ar cast member on a weekly television show, and she appears often several times a day on other Fox News programming. She is definitely "notable". Will you please give me more insight to why you rejected my submittal and what I can do to rectify it? Thanks a lot. Joekollege (talk) 19:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Joekollege (talk) 19:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, any more available sources than the currently listed fifteen (15) would be acceptable as I'm also not sure if she satisfies the journalists guidelines. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  19:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

19:10:09, 4 November 2015 review of submission by Etlipman
It's worth mentioning Peter Lipman is already on wikipedia in two other places, but unlinked https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenVMS#History https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Cutler#VMS His name was spelled incorrectly. I corrected that, and have now authored an article detailing his contributions — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etlipman (talk • contribs) 19:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

There are additional references to Peter Lipman's work on the web Should I reference patents? http://www.google.com/patents/EP0550286A2?cl=un Perhaps URLs at Universities that reference him as a computer architect? http://people.cs.clemson.edu/~mark/architects.html

I was going for reference quality over quantity. I found people on USENET asking about Peter: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.os.vms/c9_quls-Nc8/2VpapWb9hEcJ I am hoping that others will contribute to it and add additional references.

Also will add these two paper references so that it isn't just websites and PDFs Edgar H. Schein, Peter S. DeLisi, Paul J. Kampas, and Michael M. Sonduck, DEC Is Dead, Long Live DEC: The Lasting Legacy of Digital Equipment Corporation (San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler, 2003), ISBN 1-57675-225-9.

Lawrence J. Kenah, Ruth E. Goldenberg, Simon F. Bate, “Vax/Vms Internals and Data Structures: Version 4.4” May, 1988, ISBN 1-55558-008-4. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etlipman (talk • contribs) 19:50, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Etlipman (talk) 19:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

20:08:09, 4 November 2015 review of submission by Yawsyams
Added more coverage.

21:15:31, 4 November 2015 review of submission by LanceT
Hi I have added content to the page could you review again. ThanksLanceT (talk) 21:15, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

deprod
I have removed the prod tag from Mollie Milligan, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! 2602:30A:2EFE:F050:A51D:74AE:FC51:1E65 (talk) 22:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Global Economic Prospects
You have commented on an article has been flagged for deletion. I am the author of this page. I am a World Bank employee, which I've made clear on my user page (GL19GL61).

I don't see any way to respond to the ongoing debate, which can be found: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Global_Economic_Prospects

I'd like to point out that:

"Global Economic Prospects" is a major flagship report from the World Bank. It is cited -- by name -- in hundreds of news articles from around the world. I have added links to eight such citings:

1. U.S. - Wall Street Journal: "World Bank Cuts 2015 Global Growth Forecast to 2.8%". http://www.wsj.com/articles/world-bank-cuts-2015-global-growth-forecast-to-2-8-1433966532

2. U.K. - The Guardian: "World Bank slashes growth forecast for emerging economies". http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/jun/10/world-bank-growth-forecast-emerging-economies

3. U.S. - Washington Post: "World Bank trims growth forecast". http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/world-bank-trims-growth-forecast/2013/01/15/f5fafc0e-5f48-11e2-b05a-605528f6b712_story.html

4. Bulgaria: "Bulgaria’s Economy to Grow by 1.1% in 2015". http://www.novinite.com/articles/165954/Bulgaria%E2%80%99s+Economy+to+Grow+by+1.1+in+2015+%E2%80%93+World+Bank

5. Botswana: "South Africa’s and Botswana’s performance and outlook". http://www.mmegi.bw/index.php?aid=54543&dir=2015/october/02

6. Japan: "'Another disappointing year' for global growth: World Bank's Kose". http://asia.nikkei.com/Viewpoints/Economeister/Another-disappointing-year-for-global-growth-World-Bank-s-Kose

7. Iran: "Iran turns to WB, IMF for economic help". http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=249996

8. Myanmar: "World Bank slashes growth forecast". http://www.mmtimes.com/index.php/business/16833-world-bank-slashes-growth-forecast.html

I would appreciate your guidance. Thanks. GL19GL61 (talk) 22:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The article can be drafted and userfied to your userspace if you like, until the article is better set for mainspace. As for commenting at the AfD, you can easily be bold and comment there if you like (there's no limitations for authors commenting about their own articles). Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  22:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

00:50:34, 5 November 2015 review of submission by Jdxzhu
Hi David,

I'm done adding available sources. Please let me know if there is anyting else that I need to do before I hit resubmit button. I appreciate your help!jdxzhu 00:50, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Jdxzhu

04:25:21, 5 November 2015 review of submission by Aiah info
Hello Sister Twister,

I'm wondering if you could please provide some more specific advise about the sort of sources you require to verify the information for a notable person article? Are sources that are not available online considered as valuable? Can we site articles that are not accessible online or in restricted scholarly publications or won't this be useful? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jaynie_Anderson

Thank you, AIAH INFO Aiah info (talk) 04:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, offline sources are acceptable and simply add any other available ones. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  04:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

11:10:18, 5 November 2015 review of submission by LaureBerlinWildKat
Hello SisterTwister, Thanks for your feedback, your help is much appreciated. I have added more references now - would you be able to tell me whether this is enough? Thanks a lot! LaureBerlinWildKat (talk) 11:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Request on 11:28:40, 5 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Yaniv unger
Wanted to say thank you for the guide and for the help!

Yaniv unger (talk) 11:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

12:40:41, 5 November 2015 review of submission by Syd4tech
Person Name is Kundan Srivastava Draft made with Kundan Srivastav

Syd4tech (talk) 12:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

14:38:26, 5 November 2015 review of submission by Atsmith227
Hello David,

I have gone through the article and added additional in line citations to support all of the content with at least one reference for each fact. Some of these references include the New York Times, Bloomberg and many other notable sources. I would appreciate it if you could look at the entry again so that could potentially be pushed live.

Thank you

15:01:38, 5 November 2015 review of submission by Nw1cmdn
Hello, I've added a couple more press links about the project - it would be helpful to know in more detail what is needed?

Thank you

Different notability standards confusion
Hi SwisterTwister

Thanks for your work in reviewing my post. I am just confused as I dont understand why my page is being rejected. I have 25 citations including highly respectable sources, such as the UK Cabinet Office, the Financial Times, The Guardian, The Telegraph, the BVCA, Cathy Clark, Jed Emerson, Ben Thornley's The 'Impact Investor: Lessons in Leadership and Strategy for Collaborative Capitalism' - a widely celebrated book, and more. This is not enough?

- Doughty Hanson (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doughty_Hanson_%26_Co) has five citations.

- Izurium Capital (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Izurium_Capital) have six citations, including their own listing on CrunchBase, and one literal press release.

- Diversity Global (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversity_Global) has only one, and it is their own website!

There are a 51 private equity firms for just the UK listed on Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Private_equity_firms_of_the_United_Kingdom) (every single one of which was written by themselves I assure you, even if they haven't listed it as so, as I have, in an attempt to adhere to your regulations on transparency, for which I am now most definitely being penalised :, many of which are smaller, and more financially focused then Bridges Ventures is. We are an impact investor working with charities and social enterprises. This is far more notable than most of these other listings. We are also an educational service provider, another aspect i need to include in this post.

Additionally, these Wikipedia pages also reference Bridges Ventures:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Cohen

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_McGrath

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Englander

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_Board_of_Overseers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Office_Group

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LeapFrog_Investments

So I just dont understand the reasoning behind the rejection of my post on the grounds of a lack of citations?

Best wishes Aung2015

Aung2015 (talk) 15:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Request on 16:40:37, 5 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by XxDowdxx
Hi there, thanks for reviewing my draft document about Athens for Everyone. I was wondering why it was rejected, though. You said that I still needed more references about the subject. How many more do I need to link? It might be difficult to find everything written, and I'm not sure why such an exhaustive search is required. Do you have any advice for me? Thanks!

XxDowdxx (talk) 16:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

New Disability delsort category
Hi: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 19 October 2015 for Disability-related articles, located at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disability. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America1000 18:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Request on 20:02:52, 5 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by 73.172.157.11
Hi SwisterTwister - I'm reaching out because my Wikipedia entry about Discovery Education's President and CEO was recently rejected by your account due to the fact that notability was not established.

However, I'm a bit confused because in previous drafts, I received the following message from another reviewer who told me that in fact notability HAD been established. Could you please advise? Thank you in advance.

"Notability has been established but I'm finding it difficult to edit the article to the point where it would be appropriate for Wikipedia. The resume-speak needs to go."

I'm not sure if there is any way that you can review previous comments on my draft page, but if so, can you please check to confirm that a previous reviewer told me notability had been established. Thank you!

73.172.157.11 (talk) 20:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Shawnee 73.172.157.11 (talk) 20:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

04:23:58, 6 November 2015 review of submission by FurenPhage
Hello, you recently turned down my submission and asked "Is there any more available third-party sourcing such as news?" However, I have cited so many news articles (credible newspaper articles, multiple University Articles, and direct websites from the exact sources that are being spoken about.) Many composers' Wikipedia pages contain absolutely NO references, so I'm wondering how the 40 sources I supplied is considered insufficient? Please reconsider, as this was a very time-consuming article to put together and contains many CREDIBLE sources (as WELL as sources that are just for "extra" link, such as IMDb.) Thank you very much FurenPhage (talk) 04:23, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

07:20:02, 6 November 2015 review of submission by Syd4tech
Person name is Kundan Srivastava and mentioned in draft Kundan Srivastav So, please add "a" Thankyou!

Syd4tech (talk) 07:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Rockwills
Hi, Im trying to improve the article on Rockwills. so far I have included new reference which is proof that Rockwills is a registered company under the Malaysian government. Also include that Johari is a notable person with his profile up in Bloomberg Malaysia. Would appreciate if you could let me know why is the article still not considered article? Also, just to clarify, isnt this a stub article to allow future information to added by other users? why decide to delete it off immediately before providing the article a chance to expand. Article like this, and this which have less information are allowed to stay. What information will be useful to permit the article to be considered notable for wikipedia standards? Please advice.

Saraquattro88 (talk) 08:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

09:48:25, 6 November 2015 review of submission by Vineet Singh Hukmani
Dear SwisterTwister

could you please explain your comment 'This still needs any more available coverage overall’ please. by more available coverage do you mean more reference links need to be added? this is my first time in an article submission so please help me understand better — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vineet Singh Hukmani (talk • contribs) 09:50, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

WP:NEXIST
Hi SwisterTwister: I've noticed that you may be assessing topic notability upon the state of sources in articles, and whether or not articles are able to be "improved". Just a note that as per WP:NEXIST, topic notability on Wikipedia is not based upon the state of sourcing in articles. Rather, notability is based upon overall available sources. As such, even a topic with an article with no sources can be notable, as per whether or not the topic itself it has received WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. North America1000 12:24, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Request on 16:53:50, 6 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Nmacs77
Hi! I saw that you declined my article submission for Ronnie Woo who has his own TV show and I'm a little confused on what else exactly needs to be included in order for this article to be created. I'm a little confused also because there are articles for individuals who have far less references and notoriety. If you could let me know what else and how many more references (and what kind) need to be included before the article can be created that would be incredibly helpful. Thank you so much for your help. I really appreciate it.

Nmacs77 (talk) 16:53, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Help! Many thanks SwisterTwister for accepting my article but it's suddenly moved to Articles for Deletion. Please can you help suggest where to find editing help edit request to fix the article or make the article more neutral? Any suggestions and help welcome! ````

Help! Many thanks SwisterTwister for accepting my article but it's suddenly moved to Articles for Deletion. Please can you help suggest where to find editing help edit request to fix the article or make the article more neutral? Any suggestions and help welcome!Marilyn Stablein (talk) 19:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

23:22:28, 6 November 2015 review of submission by Jessbcuz10
I am just curious, what do you mean the article needs more coverage?

Publicly traded corporations and analyst reports
Hi SwisterTwister. When you consider nominating publicly trade corporations for deletion, please also search for analyst reports. According to Notability (organizations and companies): "sufficient independent sources almost always exist for such companies, so that notability can be established using the primary criterion discussed above. Examples of such sources include independent press coverage and analyst reports."

I found some analyst reports for iSentia, which you nominated for deletion at Articles for deletion/ISentia.

If you are unable to find any analyst reports for a publicly traded company and nominate it for deletion, feel free to ping me or notify me on my talk page, and I'll take a look. Thank you, Cunard (talk) 07:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Article
Please check Template:Indian National Congress/meta/shortname, Template:Praja Rajyam Party/meta/shortname. I've created similar to them at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Template:YSR Congress/meta/shortname.--Vin09 (talk) 10:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Request on 12:16:10, 7 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Nebnko
May you rephrase the reason. I dont seem to understand your comment. What must I do?

Nebnko (talk) 12:16, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Request on 15:23:29, 7 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Tho2009
Hi David, Thank you for reviewing my draft article on 'Electric Jukebox'. I have improved the article and added more third party references/media coverage as requested - from CNET, Daily Express, Good Housekeeping, The Next Web, Engadget, USA Today, Mac World and Ars Technica who have all written about Electric Jukebox. Let me know if this is now ok. I appreciate your guidance. Many thanks, Tim.Tho2009 (talk) 15:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Tho2009 (talk) 15:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Gauss Lectures
About giving references from news or magazines:

I am not sure what to link (news and magazines will one day in the future not be linkable, or is there a permalink system?). I tried to look it up, and it seems that all these prizes were announced in the news somehow; for instance, here are the latest:

This article appeared in the "normal" wide-audience newspaper Stuttgarter Zeitung and this one in the more topical MyScience news portal.

Is that what you are looking for? I am not sure how to link this (I have no wikipedia experience); could you help please?

Thanks...178.197.224.55 (talk) 16:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Maybe this is what you have in mind:

06:01:32, 8 November 2015 review of submission by Lucyliu0825
what do you mean it needs more coverage overall?

8 November 2015 request for assistance on submission by roshivijay
Hi Swister, Thanks you so much for reviewing for my page and suggesting changes. I have added more sources as you suggested. Could you please review the page now.

13:59:38, 8 November 2015 review of submission by Elisaclark
Good morning, Will you please clarify the reason that you rejected this article? The first time I submitted it, that reviewer assured me that the references were good and the subject was notable but that I had formated the references incorrectly. He told me to reformat the references according to the Wikipedia standards and templates and then resubmit it, and it should be good to go. I've done this and so am puzzled by your quick rejection and comment about lack of references. When I asked for clarification of the first review, the reviewer stated:


 * Hi, Reliable sources are usually trustworthy sources such as famous newspapers, notability articles, corporate press release, Take look at WP:REF, There are various sections explaining how to use the cite on articles, Since cites are really important to the editors it's used to verify the contents whether they're true or not. Therefore, the article you have submitted was nearly verifiable, But the references you have given are used in improper manner take look at WP:REFB on that article you can see how the Reference should be used and what are not, In your article there are lot of bare links which actually ugly, So you should use it in a proper format that will help other readers to read the title, dates, author and web source before clicking on the reference. You should never use Wikipedia as reference; example you did:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plaza_del_Lago  on your reference list, that's strictly not allowed, thus, you should use it as internal URL. <font style="color: rgb(202, 171, 17);">♔ <font style="color: rgb(0, 179, 118); font-style: oblique; font-weight: 100; font-family: Georgia, serif;">MONARCH Ask me 15:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

I have reformatted the citations and they all fall under the guidelines of Wikipedia re: citing sources (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources#What_information_to_include). Per your comment, I have linked to Wikipedia pages as well within the article, but when I used those links as references the first time I submitted, that reviewer told me that that was not a proper reference.

Thank you for your time and guidance.

16:35:23, 8 November 2015 review of submission by Leahnaz
Hi SwisterTwister,

Thanks for your feedback. I agree that it may appear that I have used more citations from Bmai's official website than ideal, but I believe most of it is appropriate. Out of the 23 sources I have used, there are 8 that originate from the official website. Within these 8 sources, four of them are for product details and descriptions (# 13, 14, 15, and 17), and I have used them because I think the official website provides the most comprehensive technical information about the products. Sources 3 and 4 are related to product lines and corporate value, which I believe to be best demonstrated by the information on the official website. I have replaced sources 9 and 11 with secondary sources that demonstrate similar information, so there are 6 out of 23 sources that are from the official website now, all of which I deem to be most representative and authoritative of the information.

Most available sources that I have gathered are product reviews, which are not heavily emphasized in the this article, and the company seems to rely heavily on word-of-mouth promotion at this stage, which limits available sources further. Due to such limitations as outlined above, I'm sorry that I cannot provide more relevant secondary sources at this point, and hope you understand that I've tried my best to gather secondary sources and to ensure their reliability and value. I have resubmitted the draft and hope it's better now. Thank you for your help with this. Leahnaz (talk) 16:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your AFC declines
Hello SwisterTwister. My name is Howicus, and I spend time in the Wikipedia IRC help channel. Recently, I've seen several users in the channel confused by declines like this one, stating something like "This is almost there but still needs any more available coverage about him." I'm asking you to please, in the future, be more specific with your declines, and give the users links to specific policies and guidelines that the draft violates. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 20:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Looking at your talk page, I see I'm far from the only one confused by your wording. If someone asks you a question about a draft you declined, would you please try to answer them? Howicus (Did I mess up?) 20:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

00:56:32, 9 November 2015 review of submission by Sabermiresmailli
I've added more outside sources as references throughout the text. Is that what you're looking for? There are many third party sources listed in the News coverage section. Please let me know if this looks good to resubmit or if there is further editing needed. Thanks!