User talk:Swmmr1928

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant   talk    23:52, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Swmmr1928 (talk) 01:03, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Reply Alpha Quadrant    talk    02:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC) Reply again Alpha Quadrant    talk    03:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Moonlight Proteins
Hello Swmmr1928, I was wondering what the current status of Articles for creation/Moonlight Proteins is. According to the edit history it has not been edited in 10 days. Thanks, Alpha Quadrant    talk    05:17, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
I have reinstated the hold on the article. Alpha Quadrant   talk    17:41, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Reply Alpha Quadrant    talk    14:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply again. Alpha Quadrant    talk    03:41, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply. Alpha Quadrant    talk    15:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I have replied. Apologies for the later reply, I haven't checked Wikipedia today until now. Alpha Quadrant    talk    23:40, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Tables!
Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, Ocaasi c 05:15, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Good article nomination for Moonlighting protein
Hi. Concerning promoting the Moonlighting protein to good article status, I think we are getting close, but it will require more work. In particular, has stated "of the well documented examples of moonlighting proteins causing disease, there is only one example provided" and I concure that the clinical significance section needs expansion. In addition, has also listed some very helpful suggestions that should be addressed. I have already addressed some of the suggestions, but there are remaining issues that need to be addressed. Cheers. Boghog (talk) 21:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Before nominating this article for GA status, I think we should seriously consider merging Gene sharing into Moonlighting protein. This is a loose end that is likely to be raised in the GA review.  In addition  questioned whether the article is comprehensive/long enough.  Merging in the material from Gene sharing which has a fairly extensive discussion of crystallin proteins would go a long way of improving the comprehensive of the moonlighting article.  Boghog (talk) 10:57, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

My instructor and my group is opposed to a merge for 2 weeks. Seehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Moonlighting_protein#Merge Sw mmr1928  talk  02:50, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Then I think nominating this article for GA status will also need to be put on hold. Boghog (talk) 04:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Welcome!

 * }

Re: Infobox vs. sidebar
Infoboxes are the right-aligned elements at the top of many articles that feature an image and things like the name of a video game, the occupation of a person, or the date a work was completed, et al. I use the term "sidebar" to refer to the project-specific element to the right of the talk page on WT:VG. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 19:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)