User talk:SwordBrother777

Space Marine Novel
Seeing as you appear to have access to Watson's Space Marine novel, would you be interested in writing an article on the novel itself?

Basically, you'd give a brief intro of the book (title, author, genre, related to 40K universe), have a section with a plot overview, have a section on the characters, and any other little tidbits of use. I think such an article would be an interesting read. -- saberwyn 09:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Sure, be happy to.

It's not a great read really (although I keep coming back to the damn thing again and again - my life as a total trainspotter!), but it's got a lot of fantastic fluff.

Any deadlines?
 * Whenever you feel like getting off your arse will be fine ( :P ), although if you do it in the next few days, I'll help you copyedit it before I go overseas. -- saberwyn 14:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello
Hi SwordBrother, this is a student telling you about his Wikipedia presence --Fr33Lanc3r 08:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * you need to create a user page --Fr33Lanc3r 08:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * of course it is, who else would it be.


 * what is your wookiepedia username --Fr33Lanc3r 10:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Um sir, i don't know how to tell you this, but i nominated you for adminship (just for kicks), here is the page you can edit  Fr33Lanc3r would like to nominate you to be an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Fr33Lanc3r to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. --Fr33Lanc3r 05:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Indenting
To indent a paragraph, simply prefix it with a colon. For example,



renders as


 * This paragraph will be intended

More colons will cause further indentation. For other stuff, see How to edit a page. Hope this helps, and no problems about the Imperial Fists edits – good to see another contributor around. Cheers --Pak21 16:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

School
Nope. Normo git all the way. -- saberwyn 23:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Gas/petrol
I think the general rule with gasoline/petrol is to leave it the way it was originally written by the first major contributor to the article. I assume (without having looked) that gasoline is how it was originally written. I'm not sure where gas/petrol sniffing is most prevalent, and the argument over the word usage is sort of a black hole (see Gasoline). Based on that, I think, it should probably remain gasoline. It doesn't bother me enough to edit war over it, so if you change it back (or have already) I'll leave it ;-) Avruch  T 13:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

avgas / inhalant
I saw your question on Talk:Inhalant when I was looking for a new home for some text misplaced on avgas.

_______

The lower vapor pressure and slightly different composition of aviation gasoline make it less usable as an inhalant. A remote community in Australia where petrol sniffing was endemic replaced automobile gasoline with aviation gasoline for use in all automobiles. Similar success was achieved with Opal fuel an unleaded, low-aromatic mogas produced by BP Australia.

_______

Perhaps you could add a section on research studies or strategies to reduce abuse. 75.208.197.7 (talk) 02:24, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Apollo 13
Could you upload an image of the Apollo 13 blu ray or dvd case to replace the movie poster. thanx. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.130.210.224 (talk) 17:47, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Johnson Anglican School


A tag has been placed on Richard Johnson Anglican School, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.rjas.nsw.edu.au/enrolment/christian-culture. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. red dogsix (talk) 02:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello SwordBrother777, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Richard Johnson Anglican School have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:03, 9 June 2017 (UTC)