User talk:Sxbbetyy

Camouflage
Hi, thanks for your efforts. However, please note that you cannot rely on other Wikipedia articles, especially when they contain "citation needed" tags. Wikipedia is not itself a reliable source; articles are only as good as the sources they cite. Otherwise there's a real danger of propagating errors; worse, other sites may use Wikipedia (whether citing it or not), and if we then incautiously use those sites, we're actually making up history. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Not sure what you mean by that, I'm just fixing the dates to be consistent with what the camos' articles say. A lot of them look to be misinterpretations of content in their respective article or just sheer guessing based on the name of the camo alone. --Sxbbetyy (talk) 18:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Notice
Hunter Biden's article is subject to a 24-hour BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. You were not made aware of this before, but I am telling you now. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

"Wikipedia redirect help" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia redirect help and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:47, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Covid as it relates to urban wildlife
The section you are appending to in Urbane wildlife relates to how urban wildlife is in close contact with humans, hence how H5N1 would be more likely to cross over to humans. The article does state that it comes from bats, but it does not address HOW it came from bats, which is the whole point of this being in "Urban Wildlife". I repeat "The cross species jump of Covid19 was not caused by close proximity to living wildlife or urban wildlife, and specifically not birds. It was not caused by human development or expansion. The given citation doesn't remotely address these issue." It was caused by improper handling of meat products. You know my edit wasn't vandalism, and yet you posted it as such. And you didn't even bother to read my comments properly. Please give me any justification for this information being in an article relating to urban wildlife and please point to anywhere in the article any of my objections are addressed (do that by specifically addressing them). Jameel the Saluki (talk) 01:39, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Two more points. Are you claiming that bats and any other intermediaries (which you can't even identify) are forms of urban wildlife? An additional citation is required there. And whilst the H5N1 discussion fits under "Europe", Covid does not as it happened in China. Even if everything you have posted could be claimed to be relevant to Urban Wildlife you've still got the problem of it being a non-sequitor in relation to Europe. Jameel the Saluki (talk) 02:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I guess I have to break this down for you since there seems to be a misunderstanding on what's being said. The virus that causes COVID is theorized to originate from wild bats and it jumped species to eventually infect humans, we both agree on this. Now how do you think this species jump occurred, it would require humans having some sort of contact with an infected animal right? With that in mind your argument doesn't make any sense, unless you're trying to argue that the patient zero bat in question was a domestic animal, an animal rarely farmed/kept as a pet anywhere, let alone in China. Confusingly you also say this, "It was caused by improper handling of meat products." despite agreeing that it originated from bats. You also seem to be focused on the possible intermediary species, which is irrelevant for the question of where the virus came from. (A wild animal or somewhere else?) Here's an example that might make it clearer for you, it would be like saying the return address for a package is the place you picked it up from or one of the many post offices it went through to get to you rather than the person who actually sent it.
 * As for your gripes with where the information is within the article, looking at it again now I do agree. That whole paragraph itself is quite general and could apply to anywhere humans and animals share habitats, so I'll probably move it to the top section of the page where it'll be more appropriate. Sxbbetyy (talk) 23:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Breach of the peace movie" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Breach_of_the_peace_movie&redirect=no Breach of the peace movie] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 06:57, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)