User talk:Sxkc

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deji (YouTuber) (April 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deji (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deji (YouTuber), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Deji_(YouTuber) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Deji_(YouTuber) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Deji (YouTuber)


The page Draft:Deji (YouTuber) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 00:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)


 * My draft was made way before the article Deji (YouTuber) was created so its impossible for my draft to be a repost of that article, you can literally check the dates. I have nothing to do with the article Deji (YouTuber), I didn't even make a single edit on it, I knew that article was going to be deleted. Also, while the subject was the same, most of the info in my draft was different to that of the article. Yes, I'm obviously not going to remake that draft, I made it a long time ago, I'm just addressing the fact that it wasn't a repost of the article Deji (YouTuber) because my draft was made way before the article.—Sxkc (talk) 15:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Fair enough on the timing aspect, but then it still would have qualified for something like G6 cause it wouldn't be able to make to mainspace. This notice is just a normal template that is put on talkpages. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 14:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

=Dissimulation (KSI album)=

Hello Sxkc, I don't think you are understanding my points. The Billboard 200 comprises the US Album Sales Chart, meaning there's no need for a mention of the US Album Sales Chart. This is mentioned frequently in Wikipedia rules/guidelines. Also, it's ok to include the UK Independent Chart because this doesn't "make up" the UK Album Chart - the UK Independent Chart is a sub-genre of the UK Album Chart, just like the UK R&B Album Chart. I don't want to have to keep reverting your changes and resulting in an edit war. You need to just accept that there is no need for a mention of those two US Sales Charts. The three articles you gave in defence of your argument don't even defend your argument. The first article doesn't even include the chart, and the other two articles CAN include those charts because the album DID NOT chart on the Billboard 200. KSI DID chart on the Billboard 200, meaning there is NO NEED for US Album Sales Charts when the main, primary US Chart is already cited. I hope that you can understand where you have misunderstood. Also, when you revert my recent edit, you're also reverting other constructive edits made to the article. If your going to revert someone's edit, at least revert the necessary part, not the whole edit. Your behaviour completely goes against Wikipedia rules. I don't this situation to result in you getting in trouble. Timwikisidemen 21:09, 3 June 2020 (BST)