User talk:Sydneymulenga

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Huadpe (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Introduction to Electromechanics and Transport
A tag has been placed on Introduction to Electromechanics and Transport requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Huadpe (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd like to add the following note about your specific submission. It seems to look like this is your own research (since your user name matches the name you're claiming owns copyright.  It is possible as the owner to release your writing into the public domain or publish it under creative commons, which would make it meet Wikipedia's copyright requirements.  However, it also appears that this article is original research.  Original research is not generally permitted on Wikipedia, even if it's of very high quality.  If this article has been published elsewhere, you could cite it and use quotes and/or paraphrases to describe it (as well as other research).  If it has not been published elsewhere, then only the portions directly citing and verified by independent reliable sources should be included.  Please don't take my nomination for speedy deletion to be in any way an attack on the content of this article or your intent in putting it here, but Wikipedia has to enforce certain rules for legal reasons, with regard to copyright, and others such as original research in order to provide consistent standards.  I do not mean to be an absolutist about any of this, and if you believe you have good reason that I'm mistaken, I'd be happy to discuss it. Huadpe (talk) 09:28, 16 September 2009 (UTC)