User talk:Sydneysvintageclothing

Blue Ridge China
I've added the "prod" template to the article Blue Ridge China, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Blue Ridge China. You may remove the dated prod template, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dgies 08:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC).


 * I did not realize there were "different" templates. Hopefully someone can help me with that.  I would hate to loose such valuable information about a collectors china.
 * It's not that hard really. Simply rewrite the article to be a collection of factual information, and leave out subjective statements (appeal, rarity, etc) unless you can cite some reputable 3rd party evidence.  We welcome factual information, but have no use for opinions.  Once it reads more like an encyclopedia article than an enthusiast's society, you may remove the prod tag.  --Dgies 08:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I have tried to edit the article to make it somewhat more like an encylopedic article. Hope this formatting gives a good idea as to what is expected... feel free to revert if you have a different idea as to what it needs to look like. 24.17.77.57 00:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)