User talk:Syed9090

Altaf Hussain
Removal of content and references without explanation is not good practice; I have reverted your removals. You shouldn't remove tags, especially on a biography of a living person, without supplying a reference for that information. The sources are all reliable sources, and I believe that the information is presented neutrally. If you have particular issues with the references or content, please discuss it on the talk page. Fences &amp;  Windows  18:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Edits on MQM Page
You contributions to wikipedia are highly welcomed. But kindly take care of the fact that these edits have to be supported by references and must not distort the current shape of article. Your edits to MQM page violate the editing policies of Wikipedia. Kindly read the help pages regarding the article content of Wikipedia. Hamza [ talk ] 13:10, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Its good to see that you are contributing to wikipedia. I just wanted to inform that it is generally frowned upon to remove the referenced material from article without any mention on talk page. It is therefore requested that please start a thread on talk page if you feel that there is some problem with the material. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and it, therefore, has to be impartial in its articles. NPOV has to be maintained. I hope you will go through the necessary guidelines for contributing to articles in Guide to writing better articles. Hamza [ talk ] 06:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Closedmouth (talk) 14:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Muttahida Qaumi Movement. Zhang He (talk) 14:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked for continued edit-warring.  Enigma msg  17:54, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

And again. Please stop edit warring. This is your last chance to engage in dialogue, if you continue to edit war after the block expires you will likely be blocked indefinitely. --Closedmouth (talk) 16:02, 2 August 2009 (UTC)