User talk:Syed Ali Abbas Rizvi 786

December 2022
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Human resource management. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 16:44, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

May 2023
Hi Syed Ali Abbas Rizvi 786! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Gordon Lightfoot that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Meters (talk) 19:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Ray Stevenson. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. KH-1 (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:56, 23 May 2023 (UTC)



You will not be allowed to make edits about your website, so please tell what edits you will make instead. We would not allow the owner of The New York Times to edit in that way either. 331dot (talk) 11:15, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear Sir,
 * I am writing to express my sincere gratitude for your decision to unblock my Wikipedia account. I genuinely appreciate your attention to my request and your consideration of the matter.
 * I fully understand and acknowledge the reasons that led to the initial block placed on my account. Reflecting upon the situation, I have taken this time to familiarize myself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines extensively. I have made a conscious effort to rectify any past mistakes, both in terms of my contributions and my behavior within the community.
 * During my block, I have invested significant effort into self-improvement and learning from my past actions. I have conducted thorough research to better understand the policies and guidelines that govern Wikipedia's content, as well as the expected conduct for editors. Moreover, I have actively participated in online forums and discussions relating to Wikipedia to gain insights from experienced contributors and administrators.
 * I am committed to upholding the highest standards of neutrality, reliability, and verifiability in my future contributions to Wikipedia. I have realized the importance of citing reliable sources and maintaining a neutral point of view while ensuring the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the information I provide.
 * Additionally, I am now fully aware of the significance of collaborative editing and the importance of engaging in respectful discussions with fellow editors. I understand that Wikipedia thrives on the collective effort of its community members, and I am dedicated to fostering a positive and constructive environment for collaboration.
 * To demonstrate my renewed commitment, I have already begun making constructive edits on other platforms and smaller wikis to further refine my editing skills and ensure I am well-prepared to contribute effectively to Wikipedia once again.
 * I humbly request your guidance and assistance as I continue my journey as a Wikipedia contributor. I am eager to demonstrate my dedication to the community and to contribute positively to the wealth of knowledge that Wikipedia provides.
 * Thank you once again for reconsidering my block and granting me the opportunity to rejoin the Wikipedia community. I assure you that I will not take this privilege for granted and will make every effort to contribute responsibly and ethically.
 * Yours sincerely,
 * Syed Ali Abbas Syed Ali Abbas Rizvi 786 (talk) 10:02, 27 May 2023 (UTC)


 * You have made two previous appeals so you know that this is not how to make an appeal. Would ChatGPT not format it correctly for you? Make the appeal in your own words, in the proper format. Cabayi (talk) 11:31, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Yoicks! I've seen so much of this sort of claptrap lately. Makes me wonder if someone is selling form letters.  I will repeat what I wrote at UTRS. "lPease concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks)". Thank you for your prompt, thorough, and carefully considered attention to this matter. I'm sure that with your coöperation, matters will proceed in a satisfactory manner. --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:53, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * , I don't think there's much hope here. is on the nose, this is ChatGPT drivel, and so was the blog they were spamming; it was just a cheap attempt to drive affiliate ads using artificial articles on contemporary hot topics. I gave ChatGPT a prompt to write a decline for this, but it was so frighteningly well written and vague, that I felt the need to add "and please don't murder us all when you gain sentience" to the prompt. Sam Kuru (talk) 13:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * , I tried the same earlier today. It's at Wikipedia talk:Guide to appealing blocks. Very strong on high-level promises and no specifics. Cabayi (talk) 13:40, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I see so much of this Chatbot drivel. That's going to be my word of choice. I guess we all have.   This UTRS template covers the declines well, IMHO. It requires clue. --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:36, 27 May 2023 (UTC)