User talk:Syed Tirmizi

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. soum talk 12:02, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
In addition I invite you to participate in WikiProject Islam-- Seyyed(t-c) 18:31, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

The relation between modern day science and Qur'an
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The relation between modern day science and Qur'an, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of The relation between modern day science and Qur'an. Jmlk 1  7  09:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Yani Tsattalios
A tag has been placed on Yani Tsattalios requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Booglamay (talk) 09:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Christopher Tasattalios
A tag has been placed on Christopher Tasattalios requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Booglamay (talk) 09:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Tim meh  !  00:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 05:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. CardinalDan (talk) 02:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Your valuable time needed for List of Marjas
I would be really thankful, if you spend some of your valuable time for the article List of Marjas, which is facing a recently initiated edit-war. I would like you to play your role in resolving it, and having some standars set for this article. Wassalam NEDian (talk) 19:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Donnie Darko has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 01:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Donnie Darko. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 01:30, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Zakir Naik
Your vandalism in Zakir Naik is unacceptable. AlphaGamma1991 AlphaGamma1991 (talk) 03:33, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  00:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Kindly take your political bias and bigotry elsewhere because it isn't welcome here. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)