User talk:Syedaa123/sandbox

Peer review
Avelizmar: 1. these edits are neutral because they are just sources where people can go and find additional information about this topic. 2. I think you should add specific examples from these sources so the reader can already get all of the information they are looking for right there and won't have to look on additional websites. adding specific examples/ information will help you better inform the reader on the topic they were searching for originally. 3.I think these sources are right for wikipedia because they are from a police stations website and all of the information found on that website is factual and includes actual arrests that have happened within that police department. 4. she is using straight quotes from these sources so I think that the language, tone and clarity work for the article because everything is factual and it is valid information that will help make this source better. 5. So far there are only 2 changes listed in your sandbox and only the second one has a website attached to it, make sure to properly cite when actually putting it into wikipedia.

Peer review response
=== This review helped because now I know specifically what and where to add it. I know what I did right and what I need to improve on. I added a third edit too so I'm glad that was brought to my attention. This was helpful because I was given honest feedback and this will only help me improve my edits and changes. I can add in the things I was lacking and hopefully this way the article will be improved. It was also helpful to know to add specific facts rather than just direct everyone to websites. ===

Ethan: 1. these edits are neutral because you are stating facts and giving the reader information to a website that has the current arrests 2. these additions are sufficient to the article 3. Make sure to include citations if you're adding the list of employees, but otherwise good 4. Pretty straightforward, there isn't anything confusing, just be careful with copying facts because that could be considered plagiarism 5. Make sure to properly cite your edits and if you're making any changes to include the original in your edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shortsandflipflopsguy(Ethan) (talk • contribs) 18:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review Response
=== I found this information very helpful and useful towards my edits. I know what I need to look out for and what I should make sure I do or don't do. This will help strengthen my edits and keep my eyes open to make sure I don't do anything against Wikipedia rules. I was given good information to add like a proper list of employees rather than naming all one by one and to make sure i cite my work and include my own edits rather than copying facts. I will be sure to keep this information in mind when making my edits. ===