User talk:Syedyadullah

April 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Blondi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Blondi was changed by Syedyadullah (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959109 on 2014-04-24T14:04:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:04, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Sam Harris (author). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.  Neil N  talk to me  17:17, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gustav Mahler, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Gustav Mahler was changed by Syedyadullah (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857082 on 2014-04-26T12:40:49+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:40, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Gustav Mahler. I suggest you revert which also re-introduced several other errors which I had corrected. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:19, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jil jil jigarthanda has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alfietucker (talk) 12:07, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jil jil jigarthanda was changed by Syedyadullah (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918214 on 2014-05-01T11:59:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Susan Smith, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff  Who, me? 14:22, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Susan Smith with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Geoff  Who, me? 14:23, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bono, you may be blocked from editing. Bono is not "sir", its an honourary knighthood Murry1975 (talk) 14:31, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Susan Smith. Murry1975 (talk) 14:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Materialscientist (talk) 06:51, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Gnarls Barkley, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Adabow (talk) 22:22, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:38, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to Robert Wadlow
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Fai zan  09:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Albert Einstein has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Albert Einstein was changed by Syedyadullah (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864472 on 2014-06-10T17:01:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC)