User talk:Sykim22/sandbox

The theory of cognitive blink suppression was well explained and easy to understand. I think it might help to have a few more subheadings within the History section just to seperate ideas such as "Founding Researchers" or "Related Theories" under which the visual saccadic suppression theory could have gone and Laura E. Thomas and David E. Irwin could have been mentioned. It would also be easier to read if some ideas could be bolded or italicized such as visual saccadic suppression, endogenous blink, Laura E. Thomas and David E. Irwin, or autism spectrum disorders. However many of these notions were linked to other pages which were very helpful. I liked the research sections as they provided meaningful descriptions of research in the field and their impacts. I would like to know a little more about the research with respect to Autism and its impact in aiding those effected with their social interactions and understanding their cognitive processing. One minor suggestion that I would make would be to list Future Research after the section on Limitations, however that is not necessary. Overalll I found the article to be informative and interesting.

SalKhan7 (talk) 23:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Firstly, I thought the article was very comprehensive and well written. It did not take years of school to understand what it was you were talking about. The clip illustrating a blinking eye made the article more interesting and appealing. One thing I might add under the "Current Research and Applications" heading would be research involving the reasons for blinking in animals, in hopes of achieving an insight in why it occurs the way it does in humans. I would also recommend that you add a section with a list of external links, to provide some more resources for the reader to use to better understand cognitive blink suppression. Perhaps some links to a few research articles would be beneficial.