User talk:Sylvain Ribault

AfC notification: Draft:Two-dimensional conformal field theory has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Two-dimensional conformal field theory. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  23:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Two-dimensional conformal field theory has been accepted
 Two-dimensional conformal field theory, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Smmurphy(Talk) 15:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.
 * To add on, thank you for your article. I would recommend a couple things, if you can. I'd like a bit more about the history and development of the area (perhaps this would be better added to the conformal field theory article, though). Also, the conformal bootstrap section might be cut down to its first sentence ("The conformal bootstrap method consists in defining and solving CFTs using only symmetry and consistency assumptions. In two dimensions, this method leads to exact solutions of certain CFTs, and to classifications of rational theories."). The rest seems a bit extraneous to me,. For instance, as a reader of an encyclopedia article, do I really care about $$C_{\Delta_1,\bar \Delta_1, \Delta_2,\bar \Delta_2, \Delta_3, \bar \Delta_3}$$? I cut that down, if I'm wrong and that material is very important, feel free to add it back (and maybe add a little more explanation about why it is so important). Also, I don't understand why you define a unitary CFT. I don't see it discussed elsewhere. If someone knows linear algebra and real analysis, the definitions make sense, but I don't think the definitions are needed in the encyclopedia article for the reader to draw the connections between the subject and those fields. I've left that in, and you certainly can, but I'd be more interested in a little bit more about why those definitions matter. Good luck! Smmurphy(Talk) 15:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestions. I believe that the material on the conformal bootstrap is very important, but I now realize that this should be better explained. Unitarity is important too, and I will try to explain why. And indeed it would be good to have a section on the history of the subject, but it is not my priority and I hope someone else will write it. Sylvain Ribault (talk) 16:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me. Thanks again for your contribution. Smmurphy(Talk) 16:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Radiation reaction


Hello, Sylvain Ribault. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Radiation reaction".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Radiation reaction


Hello, Sylvain Ribault. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Radiation reaction".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:18, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)