User talk:Sylvainremy

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Sylvainremy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! NortyNort (Holla) 09:38, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Nomination of Celadon (river) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Celadon (river) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Celadon (river) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jenks24 (talk) 17:30, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alanl (talk) 14:00, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Prime Group (Korea) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Prime Group (Korea), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 04:10, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Prime Group (Korea)


Hello Sylvainremy. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Prime Group (Korea).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:00, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gallic rooster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chantecler ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Gallic_rooster check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Gallic_rooster?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Free Software Foundation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FSF ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Free_Software_Foundation check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Free_Software_Foundation?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed edit for Internment
Hi Sylvainremy, I just wanted to explain the reason for my reversion. The page Internment has been dealing with a lot of problematic edits for a bit now, so to err on the side of caution, I reverted your recent edit since it didn't have any sources included. But I want to encourage you to re-add the material with a source or two. --Pinchme123 (talk) 16:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

The "controversy" section in the article on Jean-Pascal van Ypersele
Hello Sylvainremy,

Indeed, as you noticed I have expanded and fully reworked the article on Jean-Pascal van Ypersele. As much as possible, I have reused existing paragraphs, fitting them in the overall structure. I have been cautious on the “Controversy” section, just like we should be cautious for that in any article on wiki. There were three items in that section, and I think none of them qualifies to be mentioned as 'controversy'.

1.	Polemics with Istvan Marko. There is no article in wiki on this person – he is known for the Markó–Lam deoxygenation. The cross-reference is further to an article in the French Wiki (unverifiable for most readers) – just have a look at that article, it is largely about his climate skepticism – only one line devoted to the Markó–Lam deoxygenation. Yet, Marko has not published one peer-reviewed paper on climate change. See his publication record on ResearchGate. Similarly, after his passing away, his research institution organised a two-day seminar in his memory, that was all about organic chemistry – the word climate is even not mentioned… His climate-related publications are purely polemical. Obviously, frequently such “climate confusers” jump in the climate debate – should this be mentioned as ‘controversy’ in the article related to every climate scientist? Generally speaking, scientists are continuously engaged in debate. That is not ‘controversy’.

What remains as a potential ‘controversy’ is a so-called boycot of Marko’s book. There is not any evidence that Van Ypersele or UCLouvain called for such a boycot – according to news reports there was such claim for boycot by a student group. If this information has encyclopedal relevance, it should be in an article related to Istvan Marko (redlinked on purpose).

It is based on these thoughts that I suggest not to incorporate the sentence on Marko in the article.

2.	The Ntezimana case – please read the press article cited. Van Ypersele received the assignment from his University to investigate whether Ntezimana was involved in the Rwandan genocide. From his investigation, he thought that this person was innocent, and he witnessed about that at the court. As it stands in the wiki article, the sentence is written from a partisan viewpoint; would there be a genuine interest in this story, then we could expect first of all an article explaining the Ntezimana case.

It is based on these thoughts that I suggest not to incorporate the sentence on Ntezimana in the article.

3.	The AP interview where he talked about the “so-called superpowers” – I think that this rather fits with a section on ‘notoriety’, not ‘controversy’. Hence I moved it to that section.

In view of these arguments, I suggest remove the Istvan Marko and Ntezimana sentences, and drop the controversies section from the article. Jnyssen (talk) 19:06, 6 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi Jnyssen, Thank you for your thoughtful and detailed response to my edit. I have no opinion or data either way. I just think that removing that particular section and its contents should be properly flagged and justified, not buried among other edits. Please feel free to do so with the restored section. sylv (talk) 01:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Moholes
I removed the new section you added to Project Mohole, alas. It is not really related to the article. However, I noted that Mohole redirects to Project Mohole - perhaps it ought to be a disambiguation page instead? The top of the Project Mohole article indicates where to find the Mars Mohole. See the talk page for Project Mohole to comment - thanks. Bdushaw (talk) 13:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I feel it would be more constructive on your part to create that disambiguation page rather than censoriously delete the content which I created.sylv (talk) 13:15, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of large ancient ships for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of large ancient ships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of large ancient ships until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 21:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hendiatris, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hook, line, and sinker and Faith, Hope and Charity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Re: Time inversion
I would suggest adding content to that section (once sources are found) about Merlin living backwards in time by some accounts, and Chronos, the backwards-living incarnation of time in the Piers Anthony novel Bearing an Hourglass. BD2412 T 12:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Winged aircraft
It is not a page nor disambiguation, so it may be deleted. If you know the subcject, please help. Xx236 (talk) 08:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)


 * You may have noticed that the page has multiple & substantial other language versions, which implies that there is ample opportunity to elaborate and which is why I created this stub. sylv (talk) 08:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * This is not a stub yet.Xx236 (talk) 08:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Density (energy or power) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Density (energy or power) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Density (energy or power) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 04:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)