User talk:Symbolic & Chase

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 17:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mary Tudor pearl


The article Mary Tudor pearl has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A company called Symbolic & Chase, which is apparently the owner of this alleged pearl, created this article for promoting it in some way. Look at original authorship and see numerous issues of notability, original research, writing style, citations. I seem to disbelieve the entirety of the article except its (current) ownership and the laborious attempt to prove that this was worn by an infamous English queen and is available to be viewed in London. I do not need an article that purports to prove the progeny of a pearl, do you?? The very article title betrays any attempt to document that the pearl belonging to Symbolic & Chase is anything but the one shown in the painting around Mary Tudor's neck. This is an encyclopedia, not marketing brochure.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I like to saw logs! (talk) 08:41, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Mary Tudor pearl for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Tudor pearl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mary Tudor pearl until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I like to saw logs! (talk) 06:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)