User talk:Synoman Barris/Archive 2

My page should not delete please I don't violate any rules and I read the all things that you're mention.
Above mention subject, I want to ask you a question that why my page deleted from Wikipedia? I don't violate any rules of Wikipedia. Unknownnreasonn (talk) 12:21, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , It is just WP:TOOSOON, from here Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  12:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Megan - you should send it to Draft, not speedy it. Atsme Talk 📧 12:25, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , Draft, already exist, I can’t move it Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  12:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok, let's move the discussion between you and I to your NPP trng page. I will ping you from there. Atsme Talk 📧 13:07, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Grigsby AfD
Thanks for filling in the blanks there. I admit I was just too steamed by yet another garbage deprod from Kvng to do a proper job of it myself.   Ravenswing     15:31, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , My pleasure, I enjoy DelSort. Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  16:36, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eliud Kinuthia


A tag has been placed on Eliud Kinuthia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Bakertheacre Chat/What I Baked 20:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , Interesting, have you even checked if the subject is notable. Being a president/chairman of the police is not notability? Have a look at WP:V, and read through WP:CSD, to know when to use the A7 tag. Regards Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  20:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , I am not sure why you threw both of those at me, as if this were allowed, we would have a lot of pages about people who are not notable and do not deserve an encyclopedia article. I posted for nomination, it is up to the admins to decide. Bakertheacre Chat/What I Baked 20:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , No offense, CSD should not be used for controversial deletions. Before tagging for A7:
 * Check if the subject is notable, run a google search query or something rather than using a tag you are not sure about.
 * I redirected you to WP:CSD, so that you may review the deletion guideline. As you said the deleting admin will decide. Regards Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  20:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , Let's keep the talk on the article, not here. Read my responses to you there. Bakertheacre Chat/What I Baked 20:26, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Farida Dadi
This is as much a note for any other reviewer who is checking on your review record. It appears that you draftified this article. After the fact, I concur. The author then put another copy of it back into article space, so that it couldn't be draftified, so User:Praxidicae then tagged that one for G11. I Rejected the draft. So that is three reviewers all agreeing that the page is not ready for article space. An earlier version of it had been deleted as G12.

Carry on. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Billy Mitchell biography
My last revisions to the Billy Mitchell bio weren't vandalism. They corrected an inaccurate quotation per the cited source. 208.53.231.158 (talk) 21:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry for that, feel free to re add. Regards Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  21:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. No problem. 208.53.231.158 (talk) 21:59, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Got Milk reversal
I was correcting an obvious typo. The website "Etsy" is not spelled "Esty" as it is written in your revision.

If you need a citation ... here is the website:

As you can see, the spelling change I made in the Got Milk article reflects the actual website's correct spelling and is, therefore, "constructive" instead of "clearly incorrect."

2605:6000:1513:4B9F:5085:4C82:C67C:DD5F (talk) 23:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)


 * SW viewer is having lots of problems today, I have the article for you.  Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  23:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Edits
I have received odd messages claiming that I have an interest in "pseudoscience". And thatI am in an "edit war". Both are assumptions based on no evidence. 1. I have no interest in pseudoscience and have attempted no edits in that area. 2. My attempt to remove personal opinion and ambiguous political labels from a wiki article is being reversed. It is my understanding that I am on the side of wiki standards that discourage such things. Removing them from an article is proving to be difficult. HT Historyturtle (talk) 17:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , Hello, with the Edit sactions notification, I guess you should ask . Concerning the edit war, well you have been undoing edits by other editors on a single page. This on Wikipedia is known as edit warring and against the 3RR. Which states that you should not be doing more than three reversions on a single page within 24 hours time frame. I suggest go to the talk page and do the necessary. Check my edit summary. Regards Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  17:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , one of the notifications I gave you covers both pseudoscience and fringe notions (see Fringe theories/Arbitration cases). Your editing deals with fringe topics, hence the notice. Neutralitytalk 18:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Bewildered
I am bewildered as to where any of this stems from. I simply don;t understand how political bias is taking precedent over cleaner unbiased language. Should I respond to people who simply revert my edit and throw around insults and labels that have nothing to do with what I am doing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historyturtle (talk • contribs) 18:26, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , I am really not against you nor your edits, if three PCR reviewer s reverted your edits, it means they were controversial. I suggest taking the proposed change to the article talk page where you can discuss with interested editors. Regards Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  18:31, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Warnings
Please don't do things like this again. There is absolutely no reason for you as an uninvolved editor, three hours after the fact to go chime in and double down. Praxidicae (talk) 19:33, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , See contributions of the editor, it never had anything to do with you, because once again they wrongly tagged an article for CSD .When leaving a message on their talk page,I noticed you had warned them previously, I considered pinging you as an “involved editor”. Before leaving me such a message on my talk page I suggest you do proper analysis of your claim. Regards Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  19:38, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * and please,, also finish reading this conversation  Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  19:42, 25 July 2020 (UTC)