User talk:Syoungnz

The contributions of Strawberryphoebe seem to have been written by a Chinese student in Wellington crying out for recognition and have no place in an article on Chinese New Zealanders because what is said is either trivial, unverifiable or a naive protest against the establishment, and as a contribution is just not up to standard. I reverted the contribution to restore the article but Queen Rhana for some reason thinks my effort is vandalism and reverted it. Why

May 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:Queen Rhana. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. e0steven (☎Talk|✍Contrib) 20:22, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Taken back, I was reverting your edit to her talk page not the edit to the other content you mention. Thanks for giving me a heads up. e0steven (☎Talk|✍Contrib) 20:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

I would like to know
Why Queen Rhana and e0steven think my perfectly serious deletion of nonsense in an article Chinese New Zealander is treated as vandalism and being reverted. Syoungnz (talk) 20:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

You should have said so in the edit summary. >.> You shouldn't remove content without a given reason. You could have said the post before was vandalism. If it suits you, then I'll go warn the other person. I removed your edit. Please remember next time to use the edit summary. ~ Rhana ~ {♦} talk page 21:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC)