User talk:Szczebrzeszynski

Re: Szczerbiec
PD-Polish odwołuje się do Ustawy o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r., gdzie czytamy:
 * Art. 124
 * 1. Przepisy ustawy stosuje się do utworów:
 * 2) do których prawa autorskie według przepisów dotychczasowych nie wygasły

Wcześniejsze przepisy zawiera Ustawa o prawie autorskim z dnia 10 lipca 1952 r., gdzie czytamy:
 * Art. 10.
 * Prawo autorskie do całości dzieła zbiorowego (encyklopedii, słownika, rocznika, kalendarza itp.) lub czasopisma służy wydawcy, do poszczególnych zaś części, mających samodzielne znaczenie - ich twórcom.

Z powyższego wnioskuję, że jeśli encyklopedia nie podaje nazwiska autora ani daty wykonania zdjęcie, to zdjęcie jest traktowane jak część dzieła zbiorowego, więc prawo autorskie do niego należy do wydawcy. Jeśli podaje nazwisko autora i datę wykonania zdjęcia, to prawo autorskie należy do fotografa. Tak czy siak, nie jest wcale oczywistością, że prawo autorskie wygasło. — Kpalion(talk) 13:56, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Polish Army Soldiers 1951.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Polish Army Soldiers 1951.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Microedt (talk) 23:58, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Czesław Białobrzeski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quantum theory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs
Thank you for your recent articles, including Stanislas Hernisz, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:18, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages
Thank you for your recent articles, including Stanislas Hernisz, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:18, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

re: Łukasz Krupiński
1) This is English Wikipedia. Please use the language that everyone can understand. 2) This is a collaborative project, which means people commenting on and assessing your work is the usual modus operandi here. 3) I wasn't the one who assessed that article, but I agree with the assessment. A junior musician is low-importance: top is for topics that most people around the world are familiar with, high for most people within a given subject area, mid for some, and low, for very few. And I bet that if you polled a 1000 Polish people - or even classical music fans - no more than 1 in a 1000 would recognize his name. So, low. Through, this being a collaborative project, you can simply change the assessment yourself. It's not like anyone cares about importance ratings much, they are only for editors, and not really useful. Unlike the WikiProject tags themselves (and the article quality rating), which I explained above. You can of course ignore them and keep working alone, but then don't expect much assistance, or visibility for your articles. If you find other Wikipedias more friendly, feel free to work there. We do appreciate your contributions here, though, so I hope you'll stay around. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Adrian Zandberg na polskiej Wikipedii
Proszę się nie przejmować wpisami administratorów polskiej Wikipedii. Polska Wikipedia jest "specyficzna", w innych wersjach językowych panuje przyjemniejsza atmosfera. Hasła o Zandbergu szkoda, co jakiś czas usuwają wartościowe hasła niezgodnie z Regulaminem DNU, ale widać taka specyfika polskiej wersji. Z pozdrowieniami Kmicic (talk) 19:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Po swoich doświadczeniach stwierdzam, że szkoda czasu na polską Wikipedię. Podejście polskiej społeczności do zasad projektu, jak i przestrzeganie netykiety, pozostawia wiele do życzenia. Na innych Wikipediach jest znacznie przyjemniej :) Z pozdrowieniami Kmicic (talk) 21:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carl Max Schultheiss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carnegie Museum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Paul Berthon
Hi, I reverted your edits as they don't seem appropriate at all, on these grounds:
 * Almost everybody in the world is known by a first name and a surname, so if the article is at a different title (such as one with a middle name, or a stage name or pen name) then it's reasonable that there should be a redirect from this form.
 * Articles should never be blanked, as blank pages are visible to the public and will as such confuse readers.
 * Your renaming of the page to "Paul B" didn't make sense at all.

This said, I have just noticed the move discussion and your comment on the article talk page. As such, I'll continue the discussion there. — Smjg (talk) 14:54, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Łukasz Krupiński has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. ''"XXX" means often pornography and it's may be considered inappropriate. Please refrain from using this phrase on edit summaries. Thank you.'' Stylez995 (talk) 12:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Tomasz Wójcik
Hi the above article has been moved to Draft:Tomasz Wójcik because it has no references. If references to reliable sources are added it can go through the WP:AFC process or be moved directly back to mainspace for review, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 22:39, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Tomasz Wójcik has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tomasz Wójcik. Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 23:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomasz Wójcik (December 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomasz Wójcik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  03:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tomasz Wójcik


Hello, Szczebrzeszynski. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Tomasz Wójcik".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 15:48, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Tomasz Wójcik has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tomasz Wójcik. Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 19:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomasz Wójcik has been accepted
 Tomasz Wójcik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Atlantic306 (talk) 17:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jerzy Wójcik (cinematographer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Jerzy_W%C3%B3jcik_%28cinematographer%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Jerzy_W%C3%B3jcik_%28cinematographer%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 15 January 2018 (UTC)