User talk:Szojaji

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Szojaji. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:11, 16 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Mr Ollie,
 * Thank you for your comments. However, I should mention that the section that I added and you removed it, was not for the purpose of advertisement. The following article which I cited in that section was a result of high-tech research conducted in a collaborative work between France and Sweden. It was presented in a high ranked conference and published in a peer-reviewed proceeding of that conference.
 * https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3383652.3423917
 * I tried to add more knowledge about the Politeness Theory to the respective page. Since no one else is aware of these scientific research and progress. So as researchers, we should contribute to distributing new cutting edge knowledge to public. Otherwise, it will stay in the small scientific community forever.
 * Best,
 * Sahba Szojaji (talk) 10:34, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is specifically not supposed to be used to distribute new cutting edge knowledge to the public. Writing a section about your own work cited to your own paper is the kind of thing that the WP:COI guideline is there to discourage. - MrOllie (talk) 13:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry if added something out of the scope of Wikipedia. However, I can see numerous pages and entries in Wikipedia exactly similar to what I entered. Also, university encourages us to publish summaries of our work on Wikipedia. 2001:6B0:1:1DE0:39F1:EF5E:11C6:DDF8 (talk) 13:30, 18 August 2022 (UTC)