User talk:Szron

Welcome, roadfan!
Hello, Szron, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects—WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:AURD (Australia), WP:CARD (Canada), WP:HKRD (Hong Kong), WP:INRD (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. If your interest is in roads in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me! If you like communicating through IRC, feel free to ask questions at as well. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions. For more information, see WP:HWY/IRC. Again, welcome!  Imzadi 1979  →   22:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Interstate 96
I have partially reverted this edit of yours at the moment for a pair of reasons. Having said that, I did shift the footnote, and I commented out the rest of your edit for the moment. Tomorrow, I will look for a news article about the freeway opening to confirm that I-96 did open as scheduled, and I will remove the tags that are hiding your text when I apply a citation to back that sentence. Given that Interstate 96 is a Featured Article, and given the amount of work that went into getting and keeping it at that status, I would like to keep the quality levels high so that the article remains a FA for a long time to come.  Imzadi 1979  →   22:32, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Information was inserted at the end of an existing sentence and before the footnote. That new information can't be cited to that existing footnote because it is information about the freeway opening in September 2014 and the footnote is to a source published in April 2104. At a bare minimum, in the future you should insert new information after the footnote. Additionally, your new information will need a footnote.
 * 2) The edit was made on September 21, 2014, about a freeway opening on September 22, 2104. Since I assume you aren't a time traveler, you can't know for sure that the freeway will, in fact, open tomorrow as scheduled. Granted, the chances that it won't are slim, but we can't assume that nothing will happen to delay the opening. (The date formatting you used, "September 22nd 2014" also runs contrary to what our Manual of Style section on dates says to use, which would be "September 22, 2014".)
 * And here is proof why we can't update articles like that. MDOT didn't wait until Monday morning; they stealthily opened the freeway on Sunday night. The article has had the sentence unhidden, updated with the correct date and cited to a reputable news source.  Imzadi 1979  →   06:45, 22 September 2014 (UTC)