User talk:Szu

I have subscribed to the rss feed of "ballet access news" after I noticed that several of the references pointed to it. I believe that site is fairly up to date, also for bills that die. --KarlFrei (talk) 14:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, that makes me feel better. :)  I was really worried that we were making such a big deal out of "current status" when perhaps we didn't have the current info!  Szu (talk) 10:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't think we have an obligation to be totally accurate regarding current status of bills, we are not a news organization. If something is wrong, somebody will come along and fix it... By the way, above I meant BALLOT access news, but perhaps you got that :-) --KarlFrei (talk) 11:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah I figured it out... ballet access news wouldn't be very helpful in keeping up to date with NPVIC. ;-) Szu (talk) 06:09, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Maine
The bill died in Maine, could you update the map? (It passed one house.) Thanks! --KarlFrei (talk) 08:25, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Done. BTW, great job updating the legislative references.  I know I'd have no idea how to do that.  There's only one suggestion I'd make, which is that I think you can keep DC on the chart...  of course it isn't a state, but it can join an interstate compact by an act of Congress.  NPV's leaders have said that they are going to try to win approval from Congress, not just so that they can silence the critics who insist upon Congressional approval for the compact, but also so that DC can join. Szu (talk) 16:59, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thanks for that :-) Now let's hope this bill will actually go somewhere! I guess it will take at least another year or two. Of course, once more states join it, the resistance to it might become larger too. Anyway, it remains an interesting idea.--KarlFrei (talk) 18:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Well you definitely deserved credit for all the time you put in! Yes, NPVIC is a fascinating idea... I'd love to see how it affects politics all across the country... no more red states, blue states, or swing states.  It's a longshot though; if I had to guess, I'd say a constitutional amendment will probably abolish the EC first.  In any case, thanks again for all the hard work!
 * Szu (talk) 16:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Maps
Hi Szu, the maps at the National Popular Vote article have disappeared (the ones with the 2006 and 2007 status). Could you have a look? Thanks, --KarlFrei (talk) 07:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * They've disappeared? Weird... I still see them!
 * Maybe somebody can help if you post the problem on the article's talk page?
 * Szu (talk) 17:31, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't know what happened there, I see them now... --KarlFrei (talk) 15:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Did you see the new suggestion on the NPV talk page? It looks like a good idea to me, but I guess this work would have to be done by you... --KarlFrei (talk) 16:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up! Szu (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi Szu, could you update the maps again? The bill is currently only still pending in seven states. (All other sessions have finished.) --KarlFrei (talk) 09:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Free discussion of NPVIC
Feel free to use this space for discussions that aren't about the Wikipedia article. Szu (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Here are states listed in order of underrepresentation/overrepresentation in the Electoral College (i.e. population per electoral vote).
 * {| class="wikitable sortable"

! width="50"|State !! width="100"|Population (2007 est.) !! width="20" | Elec. College votes || Pop. per electoral vote
 * - bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
 * -1            alexanderstate            100%         60 billion
 * Texas (most underrepresented) || ||  ||
 * Florida || ||  ||
 * California || ||  ||
 * Georgia || ||  ||
 * Arizona || ||  ||
 * New York || ||  ||
 * Illinois || ||  ||
 * North Carolina || ||  ||
 * Virginia || ||  ||
 * Michigan || ||  ||
 * Pennsylvania || ||  ||
 * Washington || ||  ||
 * New Jersey || ||  ||
 * Indiana || ||  ||
 * Ohio || ||  ||
 * Maryland || ||  ||
 * Wisconsin || ||  ||
 * Tennessee || ||  ||
 * South Carolina || ||  ||
 * Colorado || ||  ||
 * Massachusetts || ||  ||
 * Oregon || ||  ||
 * Missouri || || ||
 * Kentucky || ||  ||
 * Utah || ||  ||
 * Minnesota || ||  ||
 * Oklahoma || ||  ||
 * Alabama || ||  ||
 * Nevada || ||  ||
 * Connecticut || ||  ||
 * Mississippi || ||  ||
 * Louisiana || ||  ||
 * Arkansas || ||  ||
 * Kansas || ||  ||
 * New Mexico || ||  ||
 * Iowa || ||  ||
 * Idaho || ||  ||
 * West Virginia || ||  ||
 * Nebraska || ||  ||
 * Maine || ||  ||
 * New Hampshire || ||  ||
 * Hawaii || ||  ||
 * Montana || ||  ||
 * Delaware || ||  ||
 * South Dakota || ||  ||
 * Rhode Island || ||  ||
 * Alaska || ||  ||
 * North Dakota || ||  ||
 * Vermont || ||  ||
 * District of Columbia || ||  ||
 * Wyoming (most overrepresented) || ||  ||
 * }
 * Szu (talk) 21:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Alabama || ||  ||
 * Nevada || ||  ||
 * Connecticut || ||  ||
 * Mississippi || ||  ||
 * Louisiana || ||  ||
 * Arkansas || ||  ||
 * Kansas || ||  ||
 * New Mexico || ||  ||
 * Iowa || ||  ||
 * Idaho || ||  ||
 * West Virginia || ||  ||
 * Nebraska || ||  ||
 * Maine || ||  ||
 * New Hampshire || ||  ||
 * Hawaii || ||  ||
 * Montana || ||  ||
 * Delaware || ||  ||
 * South Dakota || ||  ||
 * Rhode Island || ||  ||
 * Alaska || ||  ||
 * North Dakota || ||  ||
 * Vermont || ||  ||
 * District of Columbia || ||  ||
 * Wyoming (most overrepresented) || ||  ||
 * }
 * Szu (talk) 21:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * New Hampshire || ||  ||
 * Hawaii || ||  ||
 * Montana || ||  ||
 * Delaware || ||  ||
 * South Dakota || ||  ||
 * Rhode Island || ||  ||
 * Alaska || ||  ||
 * North Dakota || ||  ||
 * Vermont || ||  ||
 * District of Columbia || ||  ||
 * Wyoming (most overrepresented) || ||  ||
 * }
 * Szu (talk) 21:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Alaska || ||  ||
 * North Dakota || ||  ||
 * Vermont || ||  ||
 * District of Columbia || ||  ||
 * Wyoming (most overrepresented) || ||  ||
 * }
 * Szu (talk) 21:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Wyoming (most overrepresented) || ||  ||
 * }
 * Szu (talk) 21:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * }
 * Szu (talk) 21:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:NPV2007.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NPV2007.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 22:10, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:08 Democratic Primary Polling.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:08 Democratic Primary Polling.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Michigan
Hi Szu, I hope you are still around. The NPVIC bill has passed the Michigan House! Could you perhaps update the map? I have no idea how that works. --KarlFrei (talk) 09:17, 12 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi! Sorry I was away for a while!  Looks like you got it sorted out though!  Szu (talk) 09:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Deleting old version of map key
File:NPVMapKey.png is no longer used, having been replaced with File:NPVMapKey2.png. I have listed the old file for deletion at Files_for_deletion/2009_January_28. » Swpbτ • ¢ 15:15, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

File:NPVMapKey2.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:NPVMapKey2.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. » Swpbτ • ¢ 00:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC) » Swpbτ • ¢ 00:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Blakely Island Location.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)