User talk:T-1

Welcome! f Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is ). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type   on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have.

Please note these points:


 * Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
 * Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. ≈ jossi ≈ t &bull; @ 01:57, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Umm, ok... uh, my IP address is T-1? Right... - User:T-1

Citations missing
Why are you adding citations missing templates to dozens of articles? — Omegatron 20:58, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

because citations are missing? T-1 22:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)


 * For which facts? — Omegatron 23:57, 29 April 2007 (UTC)


 * for the entire article?????? T-1 00:06, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Which things in the article need to be referenced? — Omegatron 00:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * You can't write an entire article completely without references T-1 01:55, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * We have a lot of articles completely without references. — Omegatron 00:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Hence why I tagged a lot of articles. I don't see your issueT-1 17:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

visual3d.net etc
Why did you make change to visual3d.net concerning my stated fact that I am not an affiliate of Realmware? Why would you say I stated the opposite? I do not work for Realmware. I was making it clear that the article was not entered as self-promotion for Realmware. That would be a wikipedia violation. Your edit was pointless.--Astdanno 23:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) sign your comments, 2) I don't care if you are an employee at realmware. you made it look like it by putting such a disclaimer at the top of a likely non-notable unencyclopedic unsourced article while your only edits are creating and maintaining that article. I did you a minor favor simply because I dislike wikipedia's rules on notability. with you bothering me about it I have a right mind to go set that article up for afd but I don't have the time, so good night. T-1 23:13, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Ouch. I was simply trying to find out why you made the edit. If you did me a favor, then thank you. Much appreciated. I'm new to wikipedia and I'm learning the ropes. My apologies if we got off on the wrong foot. --Astdanno 23:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

About Mindscript
Yeah, I can see you added citations missing templates to many articles... If you had the time to tag the Mindscript article, you probably also have the time to help get the citations for that article, since the citations needed bit was well known by people working on that article, which might be five at most. That article really needs some help... Slartibartfast1992 22:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm lazy. T-1 17:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

First of all, answer in my talk page or else I don't know whether you answered or not. I don't get the "You have a new message" if you just write it on your talk page. Seems like the first thing you did after getting a Wikipedia user was tagging all those articles, and it should be pretty embarassing to hear that after having a user for nearly a year. Second, and more importantly, just putting tags on pages and not actually helping to make the article better is not contributing. It's just being a (quoting my native language) reverendo pajero. Yes, that was the best way of expressing it. Now, as I was writing, you need to actually help get the citations or else you're just a tagging pest. If you're not gonna help, don't do the useless by tagging an article for something that's known. Mindscript doesn't have many sources since (guess what) it's a relatively new programming language which people haven't tried yet. The only people I know actually frequently use it are the Wikipedia user Coredev and I. No more mindscript users that actually know others exist. Hence, not many sources. So, are you going to help, or just uselessly tag articles? Slartibartfast1992 22:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

No, not goodbye. There are probably hundreds of thousands of Mindscript users worldwide, but as I stated earlier, not many know others exist, thus they do not communicate. Besides, don't come saying "Wikipedia rules" or "standards" when you didn't even know you had to leave messages in the other user's page until yesterday. Also, the only function of tags is informing other users, but here's what goes on in your mind: "why actually work on the article while I can just put tags so let everybody else know that they should work on the article". Work yourself. There are many people dedicated to the Mindscript article but here you come, the useless tagger, put a tag on the article about which content is already known throughout the users of the article before you put the freaking tag there. Help a bit. You definitely fit what you call yourself: lazy. FYI: that's what pajero means, except in a vulgar and degrading way that fits you exactly, for some quite obvious reason. Slartibartfast1992 23:23, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Anda a cagar, pedazo de mierda. Clearly with the humongously tiring edits that you perform, you don't have much time to waste. Tagging articles must really take up your time. Goodbye. Slartibartfast1992 14:23, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

references added to ChucK
Hi there! We've added a reference section for ChucK. Does it look alright? Thanks! gewang 04:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)