User talk:T-blue-T

Copyright problems with Ipod converter
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ipod converter, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Ipod converter appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ipod converter has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Further to this: please see what Wikipedia is not – specifically it is not a review website. The place for the content which you created the article from is on a blog or review site, i.e. it should stay where it was – on a blog site. It is unlikely that the article would ever be considered encyclopedic in that state in any case. – B.hotep •talk• 13:06, 28 July 2009 (UTC)