User talk:T-stud

December 2020
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Wonder Woman 1984, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 01:38, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm David O. Johnson. I noticed that in this edit to Wonder Woman 1984, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. David O. Johnson (talk) 04:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wonder Woman 1984, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 05:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Wonder Woman 1984
Hi there! I noticed you've made 17 edits over the past week to Wonder Woman 1984, specifically regarding its critical reception. Per WP:MOSFILM, please note that to "maintain a neutral point of view, it is recommended to sample a reasonable balance of [a film's] reviews." As demosntrated above, attempts to remove page content without a valid reason will be reverted, and, if persistent, may lead to a page block. If you have any questions, feel free to reply here, ask for assistance at the Help desk, or leave a message on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing! DanCherek (talk) 05:48, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't understand the edits T-stud has made either. Why anyone would want to delete a review from Janet Maslin? Please do not delete reviews from reliable sources.
 * If you feel the source is being misquoted or in some way misrepresented then say so on the Talk page, but don't delete properly referenced reviews from reliable sources.
 * If you want to add other reviews, you can! Please try to pick reviews from reliable sources, such as Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, IndieWire.com, RogerEbert.com, etc. -- 109.79.76.202 (talk) 07:52, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Again, do not delete reviews from reliable sources. Your edit summary claimed "Fixed" but that was not a fix that was a delete of a reliable sourced review from a well respected reviewer, that was just vandalism. -- 109.79.76.202 (talk) 19:06, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Just chiming in again with the same point: stop removing sources from the WW1984 page. I just spent about twenty minutes cleaning up the mess you made with your edits.192.96.65.5 (talk) 19:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

removal of content
All of your edits are on just the Wonder Woman page, and many of them have gotten reverted. You seem to want to remove any criticism of it. Please stop vandalizing the article by removing content with deceptive edit summaries to hide what you are doing.  D r e a m Focus  06:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 11:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 08:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Patty Jenkins. Nat Gertler (talk) 12:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC)