User talk:T. Anthony/Democratic opposition to Hillary Clinton in 2016

I should say I'm thinking more than before that Articles for deletion/List of Democrats opposing Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016 was a mistake albeit an understandable one. The arguments were too often political ones of "false equivalence" not whether the article was notable or could be sourced. Unfortunately most of the arguments, either side, were political rather than notability or significance. Considering some of the Rust Belt and Appalachia issues I think it is notable and it can clearly be sourced. Whether it's as notable as List of Republicans opposing Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016, which I also doubt is as notable, is basically irrelevant. I think we never really did a hierarchy where we decide you have to be equally noteworthy to a similar subject to merit an article. American Heritage Girls is not as notable as the Girl Scouts of the USA, but that doesn't tell us whether it is too insignificant for an article. Anyway I might just make this an actual article as not having the word "list" in it might make it less a draw to the deletionists.--T. Anthony (talk) 02:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Looking like this should be an actual article considering. Deleting Articles for deletion/List of Democrats opposing Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016 was something of a political decision, not one based on verifiability or notability. Possibly there should be a DRV on that even.--T. Anthony (talk) 03:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)