User talk:T.rabia

Welcome!
Hi T.rabia! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Jacona (talk) 12:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you! I'm enjoying the process! T.rabia (talk) 06:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carl Runefelt (March 26)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Carl_Runefelt Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

 Qcne  (talk)  19:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * I wanted to know how I could help the process and get the article published. Have I not cited enough sources? The subject of the article is a very well-known investor and entrepreneur with F1 investments and more. The topic of the article seems notable as per the Notability guidelines.
 * Your guidance on this matter would be much appreciated. T.rabia (talk) 05:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @T.rabia. I see no indiciation Carl passes WP:NPEOPLE criteria, and frankly I believe be is a con artist.  Qcne  (talk)  18:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello, @Qcne thank you for the reply! For future reference, should I use better references or it was fine? T.rabia (talk) 06:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Your references are mostly interviews, or listings. These are both not independent nor provide significant coverage.  Qcne  (talk)  17:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Got it, thank you! T.rabia (talk) 08:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

David Gerard (talk) 09:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Hello T.rabia. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:T.rabia. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. David Gerard (talk) 09:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello David,
 * Thank you for reaching out to me. I am in no way being paid for the edits. This was my first Wikipedia page and I was excited to see it live. You can be assured that I am not a paid editor or writer for any one. T.rabia (talk) 09:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carl Runefelt


A tag has been placed on Carl Runefelt, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. David Gerard (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * Thank you for reaching out to me. What I don't understand why the page is tagged for deletion though. I added verified links from reputed websites and those were also independent sources. I also spoke to multiple community editors and followed their instructions. Please guide me and help me keep this page live if possible. T.rabia (talk) 10:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)