User talk:T.rabjam12/sandbox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindi-

In terms of the tone that this WIKI page has, it is very neutral in that it does not have a very bias take on information presented in the page. Although there were many different facets that the page went into, including the different types of vocabulary, how Hindi is used outside of India, and the history, there could be more emphasis on the script and the romanization of the language to broaden readers minds.

The citations were clean and the links worked perfectly fine with many directly supporting the information that the page is giving out. The only thing that concerns me is that the majority of the information used on the page were from other wiki pages and not a direct first-hand source. there were a few, but there was more to be desired.

Even though this page is very important in terms of popularity and necessity, there was a lack of (actually no) proper conversation between editors. This puts a bad taste due to the fact that it was rated as a very important article, but there was no corresponding. The rating for this article is Rated C-Class which is of top importance. Other than the talk page everything else about the page was the same as we discussed.

How many different types of Hindi dialect are spoken worldwide, because I know that Hindu was a blanket term used to generalize everyone living past the Indus River?T.rabjam12 (talk) 03:12, 1 February 2019 (UTC)