User talk:TBDwiki10

BLACK BOX MANAGEMENT

Black Box Management is a talent management company that was founded by Mike Dill and Lowell Shapiro in 2011.

Black Box Management's clients range anywhere from actors, writers, comedians, and directors. Both Shapiro and Dill started off with large corporations such as WME and CAA, and later branched off to begin their own management company. TBDwiki10 (talk) 19:42, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

http://variety.com/2012/film/news/project-x-star-sparks-up-kid-cannabis-1118053676/

https://pro-labs.imdb.com/company/co0346310/

http://www.mydamnchannel.com/news/daddy_knows_best_season_2_premieres_september_30__2013_on_my_damn_channel_and_blip_8667

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/4/prweb10665434.htm

http://www.intuitivevp.com/newsMDC_STRATEGIC_PARTNERSHIP.html

company website BlackBoxMgmt.com

info@blackboxmgmt.com TBDwiki10 (talk) 21:06, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:TBDwiki10/sandbox (January 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [.
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Talkback
User:Anon126 (talk - contribs) 20:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeff Phillips (trainer)


A tag has been placed on Jeff Phillips (trainer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 01:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Black Box Management
Hello TBDwiki10,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Black Box Management for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ravendrop 22:48, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dirty and Thirty


A tag has been placed on Dirty and Thirty, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ruby  Murray  21:09, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dirty and Thirty


A tag has been placed on Dirty and Thirty, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Your Big Mom&#39;s Face (talk) 21:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Madison Moellers 2013.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Madison Moellers 2013.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:29, 21 April 2014 (UTC)