User talk:TCP7269

Welcome!
Hello, TCP7269, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! McSly (talk) 20:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

September 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Aerotoxic syndrome, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Guy (help! - typo?) 20:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Aerotoxic syndrome, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 22:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

The information is misleading and incorrect. In fact, most of that page is incorrect and misleading. My editing of that page is ongoing. Sufficient attributes and references will be provided. TCP7269 (talk) 23:00, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Your editing of the page is unlikely to be "ongoing" if you continue as you are. Wikipedia bases its content on reliable independent sources, and medical content on reliable medical sources. Your edits are based on your own personal opinion and belief, but not on credible sources.
 * The article has a discussion page, take your changes there and achieve consensus before trying to force them into the article. Otherwise you may be blocked from editing it, or from editing Wikipedia altogether. Guy (help! - typo?) 23:14, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Actually, no, my sources are both reliable and independent. I will post references, but, since the references section is not editable visually, it may take me a few hours. I find it troubling that you would make such statements without first seeing the information. This leads me to believe that it is biased. Allow me to complete the edits, with references before you pass judgement. TCP7269 (talk) 00:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Is there an editing tool for the references section that you recommend? I haven't written HTML code for a decade. TCP7269 (talk) 00:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Aerotoxic syndrome has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:18, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Aerotoxic syndrome was changed by TCP7269 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.982199 on 2020-11-26T01:18:44+00:00

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Aerotoxic syndrome, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that.   Best regards, 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 01:24, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Akrasia25. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Akrasia25 (talk) 01:28, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. McSly (talk) 01:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. McSly (talk) 01:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Aerotoxic syndrome) for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Guy (help! - typo?) 02:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)