User talk:TDBanker715

January 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to ATM has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: ATM was changed by TDBanker715 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931698 on 2015-01-25T21:16:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Pizza Professor


A tag has been placed on The Pizza Professor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dai Pritchard (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Legoktm


A tag has been placed on Legoktm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dai Pritchard (talk) 21:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joyce and Puddery


A tag has been placed on Joyce and Puddery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dai Pritchard (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. I, JethroBT drop me a line 21:50, 25 January 2015 (UTC)


 * as far as I know I was blocked for creating three one line articles (spamming) that were deleted and then commenting on a protected page.
 * I am willing to agree to a name change if wP:UAA consensus agrees this name is not valid.TDBanker715 (talk) 22:10, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

is this an automated name bot or human editor?
 * Real, and you were primarily blocked because you've created multiple, obviously inappropriate articles and wrote on others' userpages as a means to edit a protected page. One of these articles was about a specific editor.  Why did you make it about that editor in particular?  Your contributions do not suggest you are here to make constructive edits.  You are also not entitled to a warning.  I also agree with  that you will need to change your username if you are unblocked, and your username is pretty clearly a violation, so a UAA request is not appropriate. I, JethroBT drop me a line 22:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)