User talk:TH3-T3CH-DUD3-MAST3R

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, TH3-T3CH-DUD3-MAST3R, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Apple silicon seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 02:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, but your edit summaries are clear as mud. If they are sources, they don't look like reliable secondary sources. And an edit summary is not the right place to be yelling at other editors. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:04, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

"Um yeah...go f yourself sissyboy grow a pair lol haha "please don't yell at other editors" you can't yell via text fyi you fucking idiot lol..ok i don't mean to be rude but you v" is obviously blockworthy. To any passing admin: I revdeleted the edit summary because any one who looks through that history will be seriously distracted. TH3, one more such comment and I will be block you indefinitely. And if you cannot manage to write a decent and conventional edit summary, I will block you for disruptive editing. Drmies (talk) 02:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Ok I'm in the TALK PAGE.....LOL.....so I'm a talk, difference of opinion for more accuracy tban estimation is NOT an edit war lol..it't a difference of opinion and FYI most edits on here, i'm on of the people you have to thank for the page looking the way it is because I put most of that info on that chart with as much accuracy as possible it's because of people like me the article table looks organized and accurate, no one would have made the hrs of effort to make the table how it is if it wasn't for people like us, keep that in mind next time some person here decides to throw around stupid terms on other people when they re the reason the apple A table at least looks so nice and accurate, you re welcome, do not called disruptive editing or edit war or any of those stupid names to people who literally contributed endless hours to make theze articles as nice as possible so quit the harrassment be ause tbats exactly what some of you are doing, some of us just font put if with it and will respond back if necessary, so stop with accusations and silly terms, you should thank people like us than whine ‘n’ bitch just because you didn't csme up with it or made the hrs of effort some of us did to make these articles look as good as possible and we all make exiting mistakes but difference if opinion esp. wben you re trying to make it right is not an edit war, but if yall gonna keep whining and bitching about it because you didnt put the effort or thought it up, it sounds more like personal to me. Better now grammars polees? Smh...TH3-T3CH-DUD3-MAST3R (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Indeed, the speaker's opinion is  more accurate tBan estimation . The explanation below not only supports such claim, but demonstrates that the speech above is an exemplary example of what Wikipedia stands for. (See what I did there with alliteration (exemplary example) ? Even among our philosophical discrepancies, you have to at least give kudos to that)

 People who literally contributed endless hours to make theZe articles as nice &mdash;it makes sense that someone contributes hours of effort on an article, then spells  these  with a Z.

 NOT an edit war lol &mdash;an edit war or not? Does the  lol  apply to the edit war, making  NOT  a double negative? If so, that is a very perplexing viewpoint. The speaker's artistry with words paints a distinctive juxtaposition of poetry with prose.

Furthermore, the audience will definitely be intrigued by the sophisticated rhetoric. Phrases such  whine [']n b*** , and  yall gonna keep whining and b***ing  show a variety of vocabulary and circumspect reasoning.

Not to forget, the contraction  you re  appears in an exotic way that excludes the apostrophe. Very sophisticated rhetoric indeed. Anonymous84hgh389hg (talk) 19:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

“Um yeah...go f yourself sissyboy grow a pair lol haha "please don't yell at other editors" you can't yell via text fyi you fucking idiot lol”&mdash;From studying exotic spellings in the long and glorious speech, there is high confidence this statement was typed on a smartphone. So, who’s really yelling through texting?

Furthermore, the frequent appearance of “lol” and “fyi” exemplifies the [nuclear] fusion of an elementary schooler’s vocabulary with the side-effects of chronic texting. But an editor can’t sympathize with such a condition when they’re constantly dissed with “u whine” and “u b***” and “u sissyboy”. Anonymous84hgh389hg (talk) 18:47, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 15:17, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Continued
According to Wikipedia guidelines, Mx. Tech_dude_master most likely can still edit the Wiki talk page belonging to they/them.

From Anonymous: If you are sure you are correct, Anonymous will check your user page for a response. You may copy the Debate™ from the Apple siliconE talk page, then discuss here. If your reasoning is superior, Anonymous will implement your requested edits for you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous84hgh389hg (talk • contribs) 19:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Yeah anonymous ill respond
Yo I'm was told that I had to do that like wut da srsly...LOL but honestly it fine cuz you know they just gonna do wat they gonna do so i made another accunt because i shouldnt have been blockd, in the first place lol so you know the wikipeida cant technically block me. cuz theirs nothing wrong with this message so as i was just saying its fine cuz im still right and they just too unhappy that im correct so take dat grammar police here is my true justification fyi. n if you edit it i can now report you so dont. just sounds personal to me and you cant to that then cuz fyi its subjective lol.

Ok I'm in the TALK PAGE.....LOL.....so I'm a talk, difference of opinion for more accuracy than estimation is NOT an edit war lol..it's a difference of opinion and FYI most edits on here, i'm one of the people you have to thank for the page looking the way it is because I put most of that info on that chart with as much accuracy as possible it's because of people like me the article table looks organized and accurate, no one would have made the hrs of effort to make the table how it is if it wasn't for people like us, keep that in mind next time some person here decides to throw around stupid terms on other people when they re the reason the apple A table at least looks so nice and accurate, you re welcome, do not called disruptive editing or edit war or any of those stupid names to people who literally contributed endless hours to make these articles as nice as possible so quit the harrassment because thats exactly what some of you are doing, some of us just dont put up with it and will respond back if necessary, so stop with accusations and silly terms, you should thank people like us than whine and bitch just because you didn't came up with it or made the hrs of effort some of us did to make these articles look as good as possible and we all make editing mistakes but difference of opinion especially when you re trying to make it right is not an edit war, but if yall gonna keep whining and bitching about it because you didnt put the effort or thought it up, it sounds more like personal to me. Better now grammar police? Smh...

I was let put this on my Talk Page so nobody can ban me agn without violating Wikipedia guides or something yeah so i wont edit apple silicon again but thats just cuz its a lost cause i really am right and they just wont admit it lol

if i gonna get banned again at least give justification and let me appeal like put a warning not a instant-ban please i just wanna edit my user page and theres nothing wrong with that i dont think let me know in a comment below please thanks and also look over Apple Silicon bc Anonymous was edit warring and didnt get reported so you know if you could let me know if they qualifies as trouble on wiki that would be great i know its outta my power to request removal but a comment here would be fine thanks

agn please dont insta-ban me just warn cuz I'm under the impression I'm allowed to do this sorta thing if that's not true then fyi its your job to guide Wikipedia editors on the right path so think twice before you dont give me a second chance please


 * Creating new accounts to circumvent your block is unacceptable. If you want to appeal your block, you need to do it from your original account. —C.Fred (talk) 01:23, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Note to Admin
Anonymous84hgh389hg (talk) 01:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

He(!) indeed est destroyed. @ho — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustACummentOr2 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)