User talk:TIE Commerce

TIE Commerce
Hi A couple of things. First, I removed most of the description of TIE Commerce, since it appears to be a copyright violation of. From your username I take it that you work for that company? If so, you still can't just copy the content over, since it violated the GFDL. I don't have the guideline handy just now, but the page the content comes from must mark the material as released under the GFDL (or something alike) before it can be used here. An alternative is to just rephrase it: Using the information is fine, using the sentences is not. Also, you should read FAQ/Business and Username policy: You probably have a conflict of interest when editing the company page, so you should be very careful when editing the company article to use a neutral tone. If you need any help, just leave a message here or on my talk page. Cheers, Amalthea (talk) 13:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Found it: Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia":* Make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation."


 * Nonetheless, it's best to reword it in any case since the tone is just the one you want to avoid.
 * Amalthea (talk) 13:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback Amalthea. I'll revisit this and check out the links you have provided above. TIE Commerce (talk) 14:06, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * See Talk:TIE Commerce please. :) --Amalthea (talk) 16:29, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

TIE Commerce
A tag has been placed on TIE Commerce, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of TIE Commerce and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Crusio (talk) 17:07, 20 July 2008 (UTC)