User talk:TJH2018/Archive 2

New account
this user keeps posting crap on my page. See his edit history. User:Sgt. James Doakes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.106.151 (talk) 07:38, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Fanning edit undo
What other sources can I use to justify my edit if I can't use Wikia as a verifiable source? I find it rather absurd that Wikia isn't a verifiable source for one, but I still want to justify my edit with alternative means. The problem is that I'm uncertain if other sources exist for such a topic. 24.215.73.1 (talk) 18:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi there! Basically, Wikia is kinda like Wikipedia, except without the stringent standards. Basically, it has to be a reputable source, and can't be fan-written, like Wookipedia. Basically, you have to look for one, wether it be a book, a periodical, or other means. That's all I can do, so sorry about that! Have a great time editing, and I encourage you to make an account...Cheers! TJH2018   talk  00:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Pardon?!
What was that about? Mabalu (talk) 15:56, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that was my mistake. Thought you were someone else! Cheers! TJH2018  talk  15:57, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Rajagopalaswamy Temple, Mannargudi
Hi, did you check the edit or comments before reverting it? The contents are copy pasted from a local vernacular journal and without any references. I have marked comment as unref - what is the edit summary you are looking at?Ssriram mt (talk) 16:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * You left no edit summary, and I did a copyvio on it. Feel free to revert me. https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=&oldid=717419861&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 TJH2018  talk  16:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

TJH2018a
To clarify, are you and TJH2018a the same user? DarkKnight2149 13:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. It seems that you were being impersonated. DarkKnight2149 13:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Wow. This is a whole new level of WTF. -- TJH2018 talk  14:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * As a precaution, it would probably best to check when you get messages from me, just to make sure it actually is me (if he's willing to impersonate you, then he's probably willing to impersonate me). A while ago, I created a number of doppelganger pages that redirect to my main user page. Hopefully, they'll pay off if need be. DarkKnight2149 21:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I might do the same myself...Thanks for the advice! TJH2018  talk  21:39, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Edit-warring
Hi there, I'm an administrator on the English Wikipedia. I don't understand your specific objections to the edits made by 61.3.41.52, I certainly don't understand why you engaged in edit-warring yourself, and I don't understand why you reported him as a vandal. He made a significant contribution by pruning an overly-detailed plot summary, and if there are a few grammatical errors, they can surely be overlooked for the overall improvement he made. There is nothing clearly "vandal-like" to my experienced eyes. There are very few exceptions for edit-warring, and content disputes and grammar errors are not one of them. At the first sign of trouble, you should have opened a discussion on the talk page, or on the editor's talk page, even if it was that user's burden. Other admins would have slapped you with a block for edit-warring, you made seven reverts, but I'm going to abstain with the hope that this sinks in. I'm also going to ask Widr to reverse the IP's block. I think you should self-revert and open a discussion on the talk page, frankly. It's not mandatory, but it would be a good gesture. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for reaching out. I was at the point where the user wasn't reading the edit summaries. I explained in them that he had bad English, and he shoud've taken the hint instead of forcing it down my throat. I wasn't going to fix it for him. If he wanted the material in so badly, then he should've taken it upon themselves to read the MOS. That's all I have to say. TJH2018  talk  18:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I understand where you're coming from emotionally, but the behavior is intolerable. A wiser choice would have been to let his edit stand, open a discussion and explain why you think it should be reverted, and if he didn't respond within a reasonable amount of time (a day or two), revert. Or, fix the spelling/grammar issues rather than reverting the entire thing. Since the section is already flagged for cleanup, it's already a problem. Making it less of a problem is still an improvement. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I can see clearly now...Thanks for the input, and I'll take what you said into consideration... TJH2018 talk  21:09, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Use of WP:G7 in userspace
Hi,

A user can legitimately blank pages in their userspace without intending for the page to be deleted (they might want to check the history later). Therefore, db-author should not be placed on another's userpage.

"If the sole author blanks a page other than a userspace page, a category page, or any type of talk page, this can be taken as a deletion request."

Cheers. → AA (talk) — 07:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks for that info... TJH2018 talk  15:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * As discussed above, removed your tag here. → AA (talk) — 22:52, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

NJROTC

 * Thanks! I'm considering splitting off NJROTC onto its own page, which should be a fun yet difficult challenge. My unit got defunded back in 2007 and I'm trying to create a marketing campaign. We have 83 cadets, but need 100 to get funded. As usual, bureaucracy stands in the way of getting things done right. Thanks for the welcome! By the way, I'm surprised that people still go after you about your username, even though it was pre-policy. And even though I'm only a couple of months in, I'm already weary of the WikiDrama. If only more kids my age actually took up interest in the projects... TJH2018 talk  22:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Good luck with the split on the article! I remember tinkering with it myself a little back in the day. Wikipedia has a lot of good teen editors, even some sysops. I was one of them. That's why I debate against the school blockers with a vengeance; no one is going to go out of their way to become an editor here, our numbers (as I understand) are dropping, and these people with their blocks aren't helping this site. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages)Growing tired of the bullshit day by day. 00:19, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Winnebago Presbytery
Your Speedy deletion deletion tag was removed from this article. There are 16 articles like this (Category:Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) presbyteries). They should be considered as a group at Articles for Deletion, not singly. Rmhermen (talk) 19:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

speedy on Gao Shan (高山)
Saying someone is a full professor is an indication of at least some signifcance, which is much less stringent than notability -- and, any,way, he's almost certainly notable by WP:PROF.  DGG ( talk ) 00:34, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for the review. I saw a death date with today's date and thought it was sort of an obit. Sorry for the trouble... TJH2018 talk  01:49, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

reverse copy
Your speedy on 99.5 Play FM was removed by another admin. It was not copyvio; rather,  http://edbampinoymedia.blogspot.ca/2011_10_03_archive.html is a wikipedia mirror -- there are a great many. They can be distinguished, among other ways, by having copies of multiple WP articles, ``
 * I ran it through Earwig's copyvio, and didn't bother to click the link itself. My bad. TJH2018  talk  01:50, 4 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Your speedy on 99.5 Play FM was removed by another admin. It was not copyvio; rather,   http://edbampinoymedia.blogspot.ca/2011_10_03_archive.html is a wikipedia mirror -- there are a great many. They can be distinguished, among other ways,  by having copies of multiple WP articles, ``


 * You placed a speedy deletion tag on In the Land of Armadillos as "plot summary", which is not a speedy criterion, because such problems can be fixed.


 * And see comments by other admins, above.


 * Most of the patrolling you have been doing is excellent, but please always be   thorough  when you check, and keep in mind the details of WP:CSD and WP:Deletion review.  DGG ( talk ) 03:31, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I appreciate it. I'll look them over again, and will do my best... TJH2018 talk  15:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Why are you ignoring me
Yes I am talking to you!! First I thought you were against Nolantron, but after getting my account blocked, i now seriously dont know what the hell is wrong with you! I decided to give it back to Nolantron by the message i left on his Talk Page (and I am glad its there). But still I get blocked, wtf? -Signed by Sgt. James Doakes

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks @Laberkiste! TJH2018  talk  23:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Imperial Pacific
Please stick to editing articles withing your domain of knowledge. unhedge (talk) 00:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC) http://www.forbes.com/profile/cui-lijie/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unhedge (talk • contribs) 23:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Excuse me? Who are you to to tell me what I can and can't edit? You seem to have a major conflict of interest here. Please see WP:COI. If you work for this company, you must disclose this, as well as if you are getting paid to edit. -- TJH2018 talk  23:24, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

There is already a well documented version of this in Chinese, thanks (you don't have to revert this) just make sure to check your facts and not assume everyone who edits wikipedia for a corporate is a hired gun. There are just too many narcissistic wikipedians, glad you are not one of them. Thanks for your help unhedge (talk) 00:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm interpreting this as a personal attack. I don't know who you think you are. -- TJH2018 talk  23:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that was not meant to be any personal attack, perhaps when one has a history of edit warring especially with the original author of an article in English (which by the way already has a Chinese version and only rely on official sources and you refuse to acknowledge it, but instead believe it is a major conflict of interest thinking the author works for the company? unhedge (talk) 07:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

STOP
YOU ARE NOT THE BOSS OF ANYONE and please stop giving false information about cedar point,what are you like 8? You need to do ALOT of research before editing stuff on wikipedia. I'm actually related to george A. Boeckling,and i have all of the family books and the video one youtube that is 38 minutes has the right info. prefix:User talk:TJH2018/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ridelover71504 (talk • contribs) 21:56, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Good for you. It appears that you have a WP:COI here. TJH2018  talk  23:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Special:Preferences
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Special:Preferences. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion criteria
You tagged Альянс-Тех Харцага for speedy deletion because "not in English". Please note that this is explicitly exempted from the criteria for speedy deletion (see WP:CSD). WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the info. I've always wondered about that! Cheers! TJH2018  talk  18:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Hydraulic fracturing
Hi there. I really, really think you should revisit your recent revert on that article. ;) Favonian (talk) 18:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Whoops, my bad :) My Chromebook is too stupid to handle that much text, so would you mind reverting me? That would be a big help! TJH2018  talk  19:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Done. My laptop was wading through treacle, but somehow made it. Favonian (talk) 19:04, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. TJH2018  talk  19:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

vandalizing
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Living in Bondage, you may be blocked from editing without further notice — Preceding unsigned comment added by Achalugo (talk • contribs) 19:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi.

I am wondering about your recent deletes of my joint commission criticisms. I cited peer reviewed articles. It is unclear why you decide this was not a good enough source. Please explain further.

Lucas, Charles E., Angie L. Vlahos, and Anna M. Ledgerwood. "Kindness kills: the negative impact of pain as the fifth vital sign." Journal of the American College of Surgeons 205.1 (2007): 101-107.

Journal of American College of Surgeons not verifiable? You are kidding right? Try this link.

http://www.journalacs.org

Here is a link to the article I referenced. http://www.journalacs.org/article/S1072-7515(07)00152-4/abstract

How about this reference?

The efficacy and safety of pain management before and after implementation of hospital-wide pain management standards: is patient safety compromised by treatment based solely on numerical pain ratings?." Anesthesia & Analgesia 101.2 (2005): 474-480

I use this reputable journal every day in my practice, as do 100% of anesthesiologists practicing today. To claim it isn't a verifiable source is very strange.

Here is a direct link to the article I reference. http://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/Abstract/2005/08000/The_Efficacy_and_Safety_of_Pain_Management_Before.32.aspx

Please respond with a very detailed explanation why you feel these sources are not verifiable.

Thanks.

I'm not sure how to do this talk - page stuff. I hope this message gets to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.83.115.2 (talk) 20:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm gonna send you over to WP:CITE. This should help you out when citing a source. Cheers! TJH2018  talk  22:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

American Nazi Party
You're kidding, right? Did you even bother to look at the talk page and ANI? The sources are very clear: the organization does not exist anymore, therefore it makes absolutely no sense to use the present tense instead of the past in the lead. Laval (talk) 21:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The AN/I was basically a back-and-forth banter between you and 7=3, and it was quite clear that no source was given. TJH2018  talk  22:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)