User talk:TJMSmith/Archive 3

Disambiguation link notification for June 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kent Devereaux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kent_Devereaux check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kent_Devereaux?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:29, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Ramat Trump


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ramat Trump. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Trump Heights. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Trump Heights. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 03:04, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

July events from Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019


Hello ,

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important. Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR. The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever. NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so  you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations. Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for  the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging. Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway. School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.
 * WMF at work on NPP Improvements
 * QUALITY of REVIEWING
 * Backlog
 * Move to draft
 * Notifying users
 * PERM
 * Other news

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Ellen Sidransky
I am guessing that you used a standard template to show that this information is public domain subject to attribution but I note that the source page itself has the following information under the copyright link:

Maybe I'm overanalyzing this, but I'm worried that the template use doesn't accurately reflect their request specifically for a link back to genome.gov. What do you think?

S Philbrick (Talk)  13:26, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello, I think the Include-NIH template covers this because the National Human Genome Research Institute is a part of NIH. Maybe a more specific template for NHGRI could be created. I'm not familiar with the process for creating new templates. Thanks! Thsmi002 (talk) 13:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for the prompt reply. I have to run out, will think more on this when I return. S Philbrick  (Talk)  13:33, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, thank you for alerting me to this discussion. I think the status quo is sufficient for the purposes of attribution. If you want to be more specific, I would use url and other parameters of the template to specify. &thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 09:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks, that worked. S Philbrick  (Talk)  12:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you and . I think the url is a good solution. Thsmi002 (talk) 15:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Seeking Clarification
Hi there,

We were wondering if you could tell us why this particular addition was made to the page on July 11, 2019.

"In 2018, 5 lions from Hakuna Mipaka were killed by poachers. The facility now employed 6 armed security guards.[5]"Bold text

We also noticed you have been the only contributor to make changes to the page (between July 10th and July 11th) with the exception of today's change which we are assuming, without verification as of yet was made by a page administrator. Without prejudice we'd like to know what brought you to add to the page. We are only seeking clarification for our personal understanding of a larger issue.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Watching the CW Watchdog (talk • contribs) 19:54, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Mathias J. DeVito
 Spencer T• C 23:09, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

You might want to expand this article you created
I note that you created the article about Crystal Marie Fleming a few months ago. It's pretty brief and susceptible to additions that give undue weight to specific incidents when the rest of her academic/writing/commentary career isn't well documented, particularly as it isn't a well-watched article. I've flagged it at the Women in Red wikiproject, asking for more watchers; however, I thought you might have some additional insights or information about this academic that could be used to expand the article and better illustrate notability.

I'll also take a moment to thank you for all of the work you do; I see your username popping up in a lot of places, and making valuable contributions to the project in a lot of ways. Risker (talk) 02:05, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * thank you for the message. If I find up with any additional information about Fleming, I'll be sure to add it to the page. I think she meets WP:AUTHOR due to her two books that are themselves subject of many reviews. Best, Thsmi002 (talk) 02:15, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

No movement on Goucher College Good Article nomination
Wikieditor19920 (talk) 19:48, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!
I love that you are doing this series on indigenous academics. SusunW (talk) 18:32, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

The Pauses (band)
Thank you for approving my latest article: The Pauses (band). Much appreciated.

Looks like someone with the band has since made some edits, and the Wiki bot noticed. They uploaded a new photo, and the Wikibots removed it. Plus the article doesn't quite read like a Wiki.

I admit, I'm new to this. What's the proper etiquette for fixing this? Just do it? Move along? How does it read to you and what's your opinion?

Thanks Lennie8220 (talk) 22:54, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for starting the article. If there are outsourced additions by other users, feel free to revert or discuss with them. You can also discuss questions about the subject in the article's talk page. Best, Thsmi002 (talk) 18:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

BLP banner
Hi - thanks for your review of Margaret Macpherson Grant - I just had a question about the BLP banner that you put on the talk page, just for my own understanding. I don't think that we actually mention anyone in the article who is still alive - some of the buildings mentioned are still standing, but the people are all long-dead. I didn't want to change the living=yes bit in the banner without checking with you though, in case there's a reason for this I hadn't thought of. Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  18:06, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You're right, I didn't catch that the BLP living parameter was both in WikiProject Bio and also in the WikiProject shell template. Good catch; I've corrected it. Also, thank you for writing this article! Thsmi002 (talk) 18:26, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! I came across the Rachel Lang blog post while researching an article about St Margaret's church, and just thought - wow! I can't believe her story isn't more widely known, it speaks to so many issues, I had to look into it further. I seriously think there's a historical novel, or a film script, or something in this... Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  19:24, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

"Lauren Orlando" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lauren Orlando. Since you had some involvement with the Lauren Orlando redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Bearcat (talk) 21:52, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Khovanova Jewish?
In Special:Diff/914568930, where is your evidence that Tanya Khovanova is of Jewish ancestry, or herself Jewish? I don't see any sources for that, but maybe I'm just missing them because of too many search hits for her writing on the deliberately-difficult mathematics entrance exam problems used to exclude Jews from Russian universities (in which she says nothing about her own ancestry or religion). —David Eppstein (talk) 07:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I must have miss read the report; thanks for clearing that up. I added a sentence summarizing the Gizmodo article.Thsmi002 (talk) 14:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019
Hello ,

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
 * Backlog

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
 * Coordinator

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for  making  the occasional  mistake while  others can learn from  their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
 * This month's refresher course

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
 * Deletion tags

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
 * Paid editing


 * Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
 * Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent  enhancements to  the New Pages Feed and  features in the Curation  tool, and there are still more to  come. Due to the wealth  of information  now displayed by  ORES, reviewers are strongly  encouraged to  use the system now rather than Twinkle; it  will  also  correctly  populate the logs.
 * Not English
 * A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
 * Tools

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

photos deleted -- how do I resubmit them?
The photo of Pamela Longobardi with an Aghan boy was deleted, because an editor decided it was "unlikely to be my work" -- But this is false. The photograph is mine, taken by me, and in fact it has been printed in an article by me (cited in the article under "Wagner-Lawlor") with credit to me. How can I ask for it to be reinstated? Also deleted was a photo of her -- just a mug shot that was supplied with her press materials. Can you advise? I appreciate your help so far! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaws525 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thank you,Thsmi002, for the thank-you re: my creation of the Making Gay History page. =) Rock on!

Caterpillar84 (talk) 21:31, 12 October 2019 (UTC) 

James Credle and WP:MILHIST B class.
You've rated the WP:MILHIST for B class incorrectly. Please look at what you do before you "save" your edits. Adamdaley (talk) 07:13, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Marie Smallface Marule
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Marie Smallface Marule has been completed.

Please let me know if you have and questions or concerns.

There are a couple of points I wanted to draw to your attention. In the Advocacy section this sentence appears: "Marule helped plan the 1972 conference." - I assume this was for the World Council of Indigenous Peoples. It then references a preparatory meeting in 1974 and again I have assumed it was for the World Council of Indigenous Peoples. (In its WP article it mentions the conference was held in Guyana in 1974). I trust this is correct. The article states Marule had "numerous" siblings. One, David, is mentioned at the start of the Personal life section. It seems a little unusual to mention him and not her other siblings unless he was particularly noteworthy. (??)

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:43, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * thank you for your ce! I made some further tweaks (merged personal life section, created death and legacy) and nominated it for GA. Thsmi002 (talk) 21:40, 14 October 2019 (UTC)