User talk:TJMSmith/Archive 5

Proposed deletion of Dean Schneider


The article Dean Schneider has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No clear evidence of significant notability in reliable sources, article has become source of significant BLP violating edit warring over alleged animal abuse."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shelby Starner
The article Shelby Starner you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shelby Starner for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Richard M Levitan MD
regarding RICHARD M. LEVITAN, MD i just created a wiki account because i was upset to see leviathan's entry is proposed for deletion. and, sorry i'm writing you because i'm overwhelmed about how to get started with wiki.

no question, he SHOULD be on wiki, but he didn't attract much attention until nyt op piece https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/20/opinion/coronavirus-testing-pneumonia.html lots of followup—e.g. cbs this morning interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xotBTzNq8EA and twitter.

i read levitan's nyt piece with some astonishment, and immediately checked his bona fides, which are solid, dating back to a 1996 publication, sole author, A new tool for teaching and supervising direct laryngoscopy, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03309.x    his affiliation then—Emergency Medicine Department, Lincoln Hospital, Bronx'

i gather levitan himself threw up the wiki entry, and it needs formatting, explanations, but it checks out for accuracy. he is a professional emergency room physician, a clinical professor of medicine at dartmouth medical school, an inventor, and internationally known airway educator.

https://www.airwaycam.com/about his bio here is out-of-date. he is now a full clinical prof at dartmouth. at u of maryland med school, no faculty appointment, but many hits for his giving courses there over many years [monthly in 2012] to residents and hospital staff. https://geiselmed.dartmouth.edu/faculty/facultydb/view.php/?uid=5264 Title(s): Clinical Professor of Medicine, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine

https://geiselmed.dartmouth.edu/emig/events/ in 2014: Managing Medical Emergencies There's an awesome one-day conference coming up at DHMC on how to manage medical emergencies. A bunch of national experts including Rich Levitan (of airway fame) and Kevin Klauer will be presenting and it should be enriching for all who attend.

https://web.cvent.com/event/44ff3bf1-1951-4814-a0f1-fbaed5ee4ef1/summary an upcoming [now on hold] course in australia [using his airwaycam.com bio]: LEVITAN AIRWAY COURSE  Richard Levitan is an Emergency Physician with a global reputation for his expertise and device development in airway management and laryngoscopy.

He was was in the first class of EM residents at Bellevue Hospital (1990-1994), and has subsequently worked in academic, high-volume, inner-city trauma hospitals in NYC and Philadelphia for 25 years. He has published extensively on laryngoscopy and airway management. ..The Airway Cam imaging system was invented by Dr Levitan as a resident at Bellevue Hospital in NYC. Recognising the challenges of skill acquisition and the lack of imaging, he developed a means of displaying direct laryngoscopy as seen by the operator. The Airway Cam is a head mounted video camera, optically aligned with the dominant pupil, that is able to image direct laryngoscopy from start to finish; it was patented in 1998.

google search: levitan airway  to see many links google search: levitan "airway course" to see many places levitan has given courses.

33 pubmed author results for 'Levitan RM' several cited >100 times. oldest 1996, sole author, A new tool for teaching and supervising direct laryngoscopy, affiliation—Emergency Medicine Department, Lincoln Hospital, Bronx'

most cited https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0196064411016672 'Preoxygenation and Prevention of Desaturation During Emergency Airway Management' Levotan is corresponding author; cited 256 times [per the journal]; from 2011 when levitan a member of the Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA

https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Richard+M.+Levitan he holds several patents;

youtube EDUCATION videos—all of these w/ many thousands of views SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=152xArQfWyU  mayo clinic emergency medicine Richard Levitan - The VAPORS and the Resuscitation Sequence of Intubation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOz4DiUH6lc Rich Levitan, master of the airway, talks about his approach to airway management at The Big Sick conference in Zermatt, 2018.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBMj-oA1KxA Levitan's Epiglotoscopy with UEscope Videolaryngoscopy from AOD https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY2mivGgN23XzoE6zZOVTvA  Airway On Demand offers a comprehensive one-day airway management workshop for groups at your choice of date and venue. Courses include 7 or more hours of CME/CE credit, new technology, video annotations, high fidelity simulation, hands-on training, and dynamic lectures. Workshops can be customized to include difficult airway simulation and swine trachea labs. The AOD team has held over 75 workshops at tremendous savings. Visit us at http://airwayondemand.com/ to learn more and sign up!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHCFKKbgvNo  Rich Levitan, MD on the importance of HELP "Head Elevated Laryngoscopy Position"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOYDlc2Jq8E     Fibreoptic Intubation by Levitan at SMACCGold  [social media and critical care—australia, annual  meeting for emergency care technolopgies] Get up close and personal with Richard Levitan’s upper airway in this demonstration of fiberoptic intubation.

Fiberoptic intubation is an essential skill for all airway doctors. It involves using an endotracheal tube loaded over a fiberoptic scope to indirectly visualize the cords and pass the ETT. It can be performed via nasal or oral routes and in either an awake or anaesthetized patient. Although it may be used for any intubation, the main indications are in anticipated difficult airways including history of difficult intubation, limited neck flexion/extension, congenital airway abnormalities and need for awake intubation among many others. It

This video demonstration by Dr Richard Levitan (@airwaycam) with assistance from Dr Georgie Harris (@gwebbharris) is a practical guide to using video scopes for endotracheal intubation. Following a brief rundown of the equipment and how to use it, Richard Levitan performs nasal laryngoscopy on himself using a Storz laryngoscope to demonstrate anatomy, equipment and technique! He also outlines differences between using long and short scopes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dvjq0B6E8qs  Intubation Using the Levitan FPS Optical Stylet. source: www.airwaycam.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0b-O3SSw7o. Dr. Levitan's Nasoendoscopyin New Zealand. source: www.airwaycam.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCsGJNaScUI   LEVITAN Grand RoundS Speaker December 14th, 2017

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fn7vmYag1HU    Clarus Levitan Viewing Stylet Scope for First Pass Success - 12 Minutes with Dr. Levitan source: Clarus Medical LLC. 'Listen in while Dr. Richard Levitan gives a talk on the Clarus Levitan (FPS). Combining Direct Laryngoscopy with the Levitan Viewing Stylet Scope. In this technique, the regular stylet is replaced with the Levitan Viewing Stylet. In the event direct laryngscopy does not afford you a good view of the cords, the clinician may use the Levitan Viewing Stylet a view of the airway from the "tip of the tube".

https://www.youtube.com/user/AirwayCam/about  The videos uploaded here are a variety of educational videos obtained from our training series, cadaver lab or various patient contacts. All images here are copyrighted by AirwayCam Technologies, PO Box 337, Wayne, PA 19087. www.airwaycam.com. [>1 million views] On-Site & Online Airway Management/Conscious Sedation

PATENTS. https://patents.justia.com/inventor/richard-m-levitan

Tenajr (talk) 12:03, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Tenajr.

50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week
Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) up for grabs in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. Articles may be submitted for this as well as the regional Challenge you usually contribute to at the same time. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius  19:28, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Add to page Darren barnet
Hello I found this, but I have to wait 4 days at least and make more contributions to be able to add to the page. Can you add his graduation date from high school for me? I found his graduation date from high school it's 2009. Here is the source https://www.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment/tv/os-et-netflix-mindy-kaling-never-have-i-ever-darren-barnet-20200415-4ojby7fbg5bwzedr7aoe252txq-story.html Factcheck2020 (talk) 17:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I added this to the article. Feel free to submit edit requests on the talk pages of articles. Here are instructions WP:EDITREQ. TJMSmith (talk) 02:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Matt Carriker for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Carriker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Matt Carriker& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 12:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sherry Towers has been accepted
 Sherry Towers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Sherry_Towers help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! TJMSmith (talk) 18:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Kandice Tanner. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Plagiarism, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * thank you for adding that PD notice. I usually add the template:Include-NIH. Is that sufficient? TJMSmith (talk) 17:13, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah I think it probably is. However I did not notice it, sorry about that. And the PD-notice template combined with the citation shows the reader exactly which content was copied. That's probably better.— Diannaa (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Leah Lowenstein
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Leah Lowenstein has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephanie Pace Marshall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Futurist ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Stephanie_Pace_Marshall check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Stephanie_Pace_Marshall?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Hilda Eisen
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Hilda Eisen has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

You will see that I changed "Nazi(s)" to "German(s)" throughout the article. My reasoning for this is that not all German soldiers were members of the Nazi party, so its use is, in my opinion, inaccurate. Please feel free to change this if you do not agree.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! TJMSmith (talk) 22:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Cool work on Wikipedia!

 * +1! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:34, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * TJMSmith (talk) 21:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Sorry
 Bloom6132 (talk) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!

Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

My apologies for coming across as brash in this edit summary. I shouldn't have gotten ticked off, as I'm sure you didn't intend to delete the heading of my nom. —Bloom6132 (talk) 03:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries! Was totally my bad. Thanks for catching and fixing my mistake so quickly! Best, TJMSmith (talk) 03:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice
Hi, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Black Lives Matter Barnstar

 * Thank you and ditto! TJMSmith (talk) 22:07, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020
Hello ,

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference. In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
 * Your help can make a difference
 * Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate
 * Discussions and Resources
 * A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
 * Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
 * A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
 * Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi! Question From a Journalist
Hi!

I'm doing a story for Gizmodo on how editors monitor pronoun changes on Wikipedia. I've noticed you've contributed to a few pages by contributing the correct pronouns for folks who transitioned later in life/were known by their dead names during their professional lives. I'd love to set up a chat if you're interested in speaking. My email is henry.giardina@gmail.com. Please feel free to reach out, and keep up the great work!

Hgiardina (talk) 21:40, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Claudia Conway
Hello TJMSmith,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Claudia Conway for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Akhiljaxxn (talk) 19:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

AfC Submission Inquiry
Hello, my Wikipedia article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juliana_Schroeder) was recently rejected because the topic was deemed as not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. You left a comment that it may be "a case of WP:TOOSOON". I just wanted to ask if this means that the content of the page could have been delivered in a way that would have made the topic appear notable, or if it means that topic of the page was not notable enough, regardless of the page contents. In the latter case, would I just have to wait until the topic of interest has gained enough notability on the internet? Further, I'd like to ask if the page will eventually be deleted, or if it will still be accessible on the site. Sorry if I'm reaching out on the wrong kind of platform, as I'm fairly new to editing on Wikipedia. Thanks in advance for your guidance. MAPPLab (talk) 07:43, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I believe you are doing a good job with presenting the information, but it is important to consider WP:COI and WP:PROMO. Based on her career so far, I think it's likely that she'll meet WP:N requirements at some point but not yet. Which point in WP:PROF do you believe she meets? From what I could tell, her citation record isn't high enough, she's not a named academic chair, and she is not a Fellow of a learned society. I believe drafts are automatically deleted after 6 months of zero edits. You may want to save your work off the platform if you wish to revisit. You can also request the article be undeleted here: WP:REFUND. You may find it helpful to post your questions here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red. Women in Red is a group of new and experienced editors dedicated to creating and editing articles on women! Best, TJMSmith (talk) 12:30, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your clarification! When you mention a "citation record," are you referring to how "widely cited" her papers are? If such is the case, I was struggling to present her citation record, since I could only think to link Google Scholar search queries that show a list of people who have cited a given paper of Juliana Schroeder's. This seemed a bit odd, so I didn't go through with it in the draft. Is the characteristic of "widely cited" just something that an editor would research to confirm, or is there a way I can try to present the fact that Juliana Schroeder has significant citation rates? Also, to answer your question, I believe this individual mainly meets point 7, "The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity," and I'm looking into making that clearer in my draft by mentioning the numerous conventional media articles that have cited her work in the field of social psychology. Such conventional media outlets include The New York Times, BBC, The Washington Post, TIME, and others. Do let me know what you think. Thanks again! A&#38;W100 (talk) 18:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft Revision
Hi! I recently made some changes to my draft of a Wikipedia page for Juliana Schroeder and wanted to ask if you could proofread it, primarily with regards to evidence of notability. I added a “Media Coverage” section to the page to establish that she has been cited as an academic expert by conventional media outlets. Thanks so much for your help. A&#38;W100 (talk) 00:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello! I am not confident that the subject passes WP:PROF but I guess you can always try submitting it again to Article for Creation and see if someone else thinks differently. You may also want to check the talk page at Women in Red to get a second opinion! All the best, TJMSmith (talk) 00:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tatayanna Mitchell


A tag has been placed on Tatayanna Mitchell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 12:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Revised: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Diane_Johnson_Flynn
I revised this draft to sound encyclopedic and removed any hints of promotion. Could you please review again? Thank you. JamesC33401 (talk) 03:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deborah Czeresko has been accepted
 Deborah Czeresko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Deborah_Czeresko help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 19:01, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you very much! I appreciate it :) TJMSmith (talk) 23:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Dean Schneider
Just thought I'd ask: you removed my edit where I added that he uploaded a video denying the allegations, claiming that they aren't cited. Doesn't the fact that he's uploaded the video mean it is already cited? Another thing I'd like to ask: is there a reason you changed "Sanctuary owner" to "sanctuary founder"? Aren't they both basically the same thing? Redstoneprime (talk) 07:15, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * A self published YouTube video is not typically considered a reliable source for a WP:BLP. Please refer to WP:BLPSPS. I thought founder was more accurate based on the sources. In this context, I suppose either (or both) could be used. TJMSmith (talk) 07:19, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


 * That's fair enough. I guess, in the case of Youtube videos, just about anyone can make them, so they aren't the best source to use. Redstonsprime (talk) 11:07, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Date of birth for André Gagné
Hello:

The date of birth for the entry "André Gagné" should be 1967, not 1950.

Many thanks, 173.178.148.252 (talk) 15:18, 30 July 2020 (UTC) AG

Kee Mar College 2
Just as a warning, stay away from the alamy image of Kee Mar College - I think, although the link's not actually working: Every contemporary image I can find has it pinkish to white, I think that's a modern-day speculative colorisation of https://wvhistoryonview.org/catalog/044901 - and I wouldn't treat the colours of it as at all accurate given the lead image of the article and https://www.flickr.com/photos/frogfarm/5773726924 both argue against such colours. I think any of the other images mentioned here or on WT:WIRED are good choices. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.4% of all FPs 16:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Well, um... Might have gone a bit extra. Three images is enough, right? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.4% of all FPs 18:27, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * not at all! They are great. Interesting to see how the grounds changed over the decades. I'm pretty sure this building was demolished at some point in the mid-20th century to build newer hospital facilities. TJMSmith (talk) 18:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I found a picture of Keedy! ...I think I might be going over the top. I did see a picture of it from the hospital period with modifications, but I'd fully believe that it was replaced at some point. Hospitals rarely want to be historic. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.4% of all FPs 18:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I started an article to accompany the newly discovered picture of Cornelius L. Keedy! TJMSmith (talk) 19:41, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, not a Woman in Red, but still a Women's College-related fellow. Nice work, too! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.4% of all FPs 22:04, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Oh, hey. Looks like J. Emory Shaw was notable too. https://www.newspapers.com/clip/22678870/the-paris-news/ Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.4% of all FPs 23:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Riyaz Aly for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riyaz Aly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Riyaz Aly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sturdyankit (chat) 08:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK for Stella Immanuel
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kathryn A. Morrison has been accepted
 Kathryn A. Morrison, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Kathryn_A._Morrison help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! TJMSmith (talk) 00:24, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Danièle Aron-Rosa
You know I have no idea how to do this and I am hoping you can help. Can you merge this with this? I have no idea why it didn't pick up your record when I searched, but now her authority control items are not married to the article. Thank you so very much for all you do. I appreciate you and your work. SusunW (talk) 19:26, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * sorry for the confusion! I merged the two Wikidata items! TJMSmith (talk) 19:40, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much. I had no clue how to do it. Totally appreciate your help. SusunW (talk) 19:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Kwang Hwa Chung
I'm hoping you can help me with this one? Her wikidata item does not show in the toolbar, nor does the authority control or link to the Korean article. Any idea why or how to fix it? SusunW (talk) 16:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * When I first looked, I saw what you were talking about (link to Korean wiki article). After I added the ISNI and KRNLK values the authority control appears on the article along with the language links. Maybe it was just delayed. Not sure but looks like it's working now. TJMSmith (talk) 17:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I think you just have a powerful magic wand. Thank you so much for your help. SusunW (talk) 17:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Mail
Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:56, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

November edith-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Bryce Hall (internet personality) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bryce Hall (internet personality) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bryce Hall (internet personality) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajshul 😀 (talk) 21:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Millie Bailey
Hello, The above article, for which you were a major contributor, has been approved for DYK. Congratulations!Georgejdorner (talk) 18:49, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Millie Bailey
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Indian american would be better than Asian American
I know that you did agree that it is true that she is Indian american, but I think putting specifics i.e Indian american would be better than Asian american in this case as our both point of views matches with the source and Indian american would also automatically mean asian american. Hope you understand my point of view. Swtadi143 (talk) 02:08, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your message and contributions! This might be better to discuss on the Harris talk page. I know there are tons of sources that describe Harris as any combination of Black, African American, Afro-Caribbean, Jamaican, Indian, Tamil, South Asian, etc. For that opening line, I thought it was important to mention that not only is she the first Indian American VP-elect, she is the first Asian American VP-elect in general. Maybe the consensus is different. I don't feel too strongly. Here is a source about it . Cheers! TJMSmith (talk)

I think the vast majority of sources i.e 99% say she is first South asian american VP-elect you agree with that right? I think lets not go with your way i.e Asian american and not even my way i.e Indian american and go with a middle way which is the correct one "south asian american" and that phrase south asian american is also recognised by american government unlike Indian american.
 * Hi again. I think the Harris talk page would be a better place to discuss this and seek community consensus. South Asian American wouldn't be wrong per say, but in my view, Asian American is broader and also true. It's the same reason we say African American in the sentence instead of Jamaican American or Caribbean American. All of the above are true, but I think it's best to be broader. TJMSmith (talk) 02:43, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes correct, I just discussed that in harris talk page and the broader one is the correct one and I have seen plenty of use of "Asian american in politics" wikipedia page so yes you were correct! I agree, asian american is better than south asian american because first south asian american suggests that some other person of asian heritage already got first VP post but that is completely wrong and the broader term fixes it i.e asian american, thanks for discussion!

Nigel Short
I do not have a citation from the Lagos tournament in 2018, as requested, because I believe none exists. However, here is a photo as partial evidence https://twitter.com/nigelshortchess/status/1005516561220808704 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigel Short (talk • contribs) 11:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mariela Pepin (2)


Hello, TJMSmith. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mariela Pepin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Magic wand?
I cannot seem to access the Wikidata entry for Minnie Steckel with the gadget, thus cannot add any data to it???? It isn't on the toolbar either. I know I had this happen before and you fixed it. Can I prevail on your magic again? SusunW (talk) 22:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing anything wrong but I manually updated the Wikidata entry. Hopefully that captures the info you were using the gadget for. TJMSmith (talk) 23:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Bless you. I honestly have no clue how to input stuff in wikidata without the gadget with the exception of adding VIAF. Thank you so much! SusunW (talk) 23:10, 20 November 2020 (UTC)