User talk:TJMorris

Welcome!

Hello, TJMorris, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Qwyrxian (talk) 06:55, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Xenopolitics


The article Xenopolitics has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This book is not available at major online book retailers, and a Google search turns up nothing. There is nothing to indicate this book is/will be notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Finally, your username seems to be the same as the name of the person who wrote the Xenopolitics. This implies that you may be the author; if that is true, then you should be aware of Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest guideline. While it is possible to edit articles on which you have a conflict of interest, you must be very careful to be sure to maintain a neutral point of view and support your edits with reliable sources. In the case of this book, if you are the author, you will need to wait until other, reliable sources have commented upon your book before considering it for entry into Wikipedia. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:55, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Xenoverse
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Xenoverse, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mauler90 talk 07:14, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ascensioncenter.org
A tag has been placed on Ascensioncenter.org requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 13:41, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Adding over 55,000 characters of material on Elysian Fields to a project discussion page is not constructive. If that's a draft you want people to look at, just post a link to the page in your userspace where the draft exists; don't copy the whole ball of wax into the discussion page. —C.Fred (talk) 03:34, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Xenoverse


A tag has been placed on Xenoverse, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 22:34, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

 * Welcome to the project. --Kumioko (talk) 12:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Alpha and Omega, you may be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:43, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alphaverse


A tag has been placed on Alphaverse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Chzz  ► 10:55, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
Looking further over your contributions, I have blocked you from editing indefinitely. Evidently you are here with the sole purpose of promoting your private cosmological belief system, and have no interest in actually building a neutral, factual encyclopedia. You have made no constructive contributions to this project while you were here.

You are welcome to ask to be unblocked, if you are willing to change your approach to editing completely, leave your private belief system at the door and show a willingness to contribute towards the goals of this project. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


 * I have cleaned up this talkpage, removing all the multiple copies of your ramblings above, as several of them were posted in such a way as to obscure the original talkpage notices. The purpose of this talkpage is for communication between other editors and you. Feel free to use it if you want to actually respond to things people are telling you, but don't use it for re-posting your cosmological ramblings over and over again. If you do this again, I will block your access to this talkpage. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:32, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


 * To expand upon Fut.Perf.'s point: Wikipedia is not a soapbox. It may not be used to promote a product, company, organization, idea, belief, etc., even by users in good standing.
 * As an indefinitely-blocked user, you have lost many of the privileges that users in good standing have. Currently, you may only use your talk page to request unblocking or to reply to the questions/comments of other users left here. If you abuse the privilege of editing your talk page, you will lose that privilege as well. —C.Fred (talk) 12:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)