User talk:TJT1174

Welcome!

 * }

September 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page ENTITY: An Enemy Found has been reverted. Your edit here to ENTITY: An Enemy Found was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/AuthorTheoThayer) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:51, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ENTITY: An Enemy Found


A tag has been placed on ENTITY: An Enemy Found, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Please don't use Wikipedia to promote your book. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ENTITY: An Enemy Found


A tag has been placed on ENTITY: An Enemy Found, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:10, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Notability
Hey, I thought I'd explain why the article you're making is getting nominated for another deletion. The problem is that the book isn't notable. I know it's really, really difficult for a self-published book to gain notability, but that doesn't exempt something from having to establish notability per WP:NBOOK. I can't see where the book has received coverage in reliable sources independent of the author or someone representing him in some format.

As far as fears of promotional tone goes, this is because the article wasn't exactly written in a tone that fits WP:NPOV. It's not along the lines of "buy this book now, it's only 19.99 if you call now", but the tone is informal and kind of builds things up. This is often a common problem with articles, so don't get too discouraged. In the end though, this book just isn't notable enough to merit an entry here on Wikipedia. I'd probably recommend that if you're interested in getting your book noticed, that you try going through some of the blogging circuits. We can't use blogs as reliable sources but it's a good place to start and a route that's worked well for various authors. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:14, 25 September 2013 (UTC)