User talk:TJ Spyke/Archive 22

No Way Out
I was there when Smackdown was taped! So I know what happened —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bballlova99 (talk • contribs)
 * Reply on users talk page.  TJ   Spyke   21:33, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

ONS
Eh, who knows. But with all this talk about how "Extreme Rules" was a secondary, yet official part of the previous couple events, it only made perfect sense to reflect the articles as such. Mshake3 (talk) 02:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I think its time "someone" goes away. Don't you think?-- TRU    CO   02:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I'll do the report because he has begun changing the names in the infoboxes to articles like Judgment Day (2009) and he already violated 3RR on each article.-- TRU    CO   02:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Done.-- TRU    CO   03:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

TNA Against All Odds
So I think the TNA official website at this link http://www.tnawrestling.com/component/option,com_wrapper/Itemid,181/ lists the Four Way Match as the main event and on the first line it read MAIN EVENT FOR THE TNA WORLD HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPIONSHIP Team 3D vs. Kurt Angle vs. champion "The Icon" Sting I think there is no more reliable source than this, you look like an idiot when you argue on a losing case.Miroa12004 24 Jan 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miroa12004 (talk • contribs) 09:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Now that I added the source and edited the page, you can't do anything but shut up and leave it as it is.Miroa12004`24 Jan 2009 comment added by Miroa12004 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I was citing No Way Out for the way things were written not for the small template. That comes from the Roster pages. It makes it too hard to read.-- Will C  00:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Do you know how many ips and new users edit that thing? When it was first promoted it was like the same way AAO is written. I placed the tables in just a little while after it was promoted. Following the same example. There is a user going around making the tables smaller and placing the small template in because he wants too.-- Will C  01:03, 25 January 2009 (UTC)


 * At one point the names were in the notes section. That is why I placed the names in there in the first place.-- Will C  01:15, 25 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The way I see it, you were the one who removed the names in the first place. I removed them anyway.-- Will  C  01:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Articles got to FL, GA, and FA without of the Out of Universe format. But today they barely can. It makes no difference.-- Will C  02:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)


 * But was not made official until last night. TNA had two weeks to place it on their site. They didn't until last night. It goes in order of being made official. They didn't even refer to Creed's and Lethal's win until last night. They acted like it didn't even happen last week. (Maybe because they knew that last night's episode would be shit so they thought to wiat).-- Will C  02:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Even if that is true, it still was not placed on the site till last night. In the end I don't care. Just trying to make it correct since really for the past few months I've been the only experienced editor working on the article. Maybe it is me being an ass, IDK. Do whatever. In the end it will not look like that much longer if by next week I have the report written for it. I've fell a few events behind though. Was trying to buy Bound for Glory IV tonight but freaking Best Buy didn't have it.-- Will C  02:19, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

K..
Sure.  Simon KSK  21:12, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

smackdown
Could you tell me why they don't tape it on fridays now? Just pure interest. --CFountain (talk) 21:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Then why's it called friday night smackdown? CFountain (talk) 11:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I hadn't notice. I usually check the history as well and then restore the better version back using the "restore version" function. But thanks!-- TRU    CO   17:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 22:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

WrestleMania IX
'Nuff said. -- Scorpion 0422  04:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

So my edits are vandalism, eh? Okay, I insist you report me to WP:AIV or WP:ANI. After all, since I'm a vandal, I need to be stopped? -- Scorpion 0422  04:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I figured you wouldn't. -- Scorpion 0422  04:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Long Time, No see...
On october 23, I experianced what you did.

My computer got infected, even after I fixed my internet I couldn't get into any websites, I BLOCKED COOKIES.

Doesn't that suck?

But now I am back, rebuilding everything that was lost in the three month period I was gone...

I am glad i am back now, and I just wanted to say hi. By the way, thanks for being my friend since like, January of LAST YEAR.

Sincerely, Altenhofen (talk) 03:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey, thanks man. I was editing though, I was using IP 206.75.167.246. Altenhofen (talk) 04:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Just Cause 2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Just Cause 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

MEM
AK Star vandalised the MEM page. You said it was his last warning, so it's time to block him I think. Speedboy Salesman (talk) 14:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Photos
Ohh, wath a mistake. I'm Techarrow from spanish wikipedia and i talk with a man that have photos in BFG and y convenced him to change the licence. I only want to givo english wikipedia the photos that I upload to commons, but I forget write the text in english. Do you delete the photos or no? --81.33.161.149 (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

OK.Im changing the text, but i need your help. I don't kwon how write in Team 3D and Booker T, because in Booker i don't know the move. If you want, i upload more photos to commons, like MNM or André the giant. See techarrow in commons. Thanks --81.33.161.149 (talk) 20:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Best-selling games
No worries, those problems appear from time to time. I try to prevent them by loading the history in another tab and checking whether my change was accepted or not. Still, lag becomes pretty hard sometimes. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 19:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey
Hey, could you nominate Backlash (2006) for FA, I think you have to do something else before that, but I don't know what to do though, but if you could just tell what to do, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks.  Save   Us.  Y2J  12:35, 7 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Thankyou very much, and if it passes FA, will I get some of the credit?  Save   Us.  Y2J  1:05, 7 Feburary 2009 (UTC)
 * If you want. Take a look at my user page. I was one of the major contributors to the Wii article and helped make it a FA, so I can display that userbox. You could do the same if Backlash passes.  TJ   Spyke   02:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I really recommend (well to late now) but Y2J should have nominated it since he wanted to, just so you know, TJ since you nominated it, you may have to resolve any problems that come up, unless you co-nom it with Y2J.-- TRU  CO   02:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh okay, but I think a good copyedit and a second peer review would have worked well for the article. I generally review PPVs at FAC for the content like jargon, plot, and PPV format. Other users, however, review it for grammar, images, sources, which technically has not gone well for pay-per-views.-- TRU  CO   02:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Do you want me and you to be co-nominaters for Backlash?  Save   Us.  Y2J  1:49, 7 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

I sound so like a douchebag, but can you show me how, because I've never done this before.  Save   Us.  Y2J  1:52, 7 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Do you think Backlash (2006) is a well-written article?  Save   Us.  Y2J  2:05, 7 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

I fixed it for the nominator(s), it's right now.  Save   Us.  Y2J  2:10, 7 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Could you check your email account, I sent you a message.  Save   Us.  Y2J  10:13, 8 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Hey.  Save   Us.  Y2J  10:27, 8 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

I'll send it again.  Save   Us.  Y2J  10:33, 8 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

I sent it.  Save   Us.  Y2J  10:37, 8 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Hey, sign into Windows Live.  Save   Us.  Y2J  3:57, 9 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Hey, sign into Windows Live...again.  Save   Us.  Y2J  3:54, 10 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Hey, sign into Windows Live...again.  Save   Us.  Y2J  3:34, 13 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Well come on when you can. Thanks.  Save   Us.  Y2J  3:40, 13 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Hey, sign into Windows Live.  Save   Us.  Y2J  2:56, 14 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Citing source
It was announced on Smackdown last night and is shown on WWE.com, Jeff is in the Elimination Chamber. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smackdownraw (talk • contribs) 11:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

CM Punk
Minority? I said it's 5-5. Check the two archives. You only think his opinion means nothing because you're a WWE mark. Go back to pointlessly "fixing" links. RandySavageFTW (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It was 4-2 in the first, and the second one made it 5-5. I don't agree with everything Meltzer says and I'm not one of his followers but I think his ratings are important. And hy compromise with someone using insults and random capitalization? RandySavageFTW (talk) 21:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Because it's not going to work. How do we put 24 5-star matches in the article? And no one is actually going to try to put them in there, except for the WWE wrestlers' pages. RandySavageFTW (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well it's not the only excuse, Kawada and Misawa have 19 and 23 respectively. And Taue has like 15, Akiyama has like 10. How about these guys can keep them since there's so many and their articles are relatively short? RandySavageFTW (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * If you're going to go around removing them all, you should be the one who puts it in the article then. Flair has 6 but his article is so big I guess they could all be put in there. All of the Japanese guys have short articles. RandySavageFTW (talk) 21:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  at 23:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

AAO 09
I archived them since an admin tried too and created the archive when he restored the article. Just thought to get them out of the way since the discussions are dead anyway and say the samething.-- Will C  01:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism
I wouldn't really call Mshake's edits vandalism.-- TRU  CO   03:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * True, but be careful.-- TRU  CO   03:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

My edit to Steve Borden's Wiki page in regards to his hatred of turnbuckles was not vandalism. In an episode of Nitro, after he cleared the ring of NWO, he began hitting turnbuckles with his bat. Tony Schiavone then confirmed that "Sting hates turnbuckles." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.100.21.235 (talk) 19:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

My edit on Alex Kozlov's page was not vandalism. How can you disagree that Colin Delaney (formerly Colin Olsen of Chikara (C-H-I-K-A-R-A) Pro fame) is a Hall of Fame quality superstar? Blasphemy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.2.94.204 (talk • contribs)

Oops
I made some changes to the Virtual Console page earlier on accident. I was trying to understand the list structure and I accidentally saved my edits. Sorry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.255.49.214 (talk) 18:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied on users page.  TJ   Spyke   18:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

More photos
Hi, it's me again. I have to anunciate to you that I convenced one person and I uploaded more photos about wrestling. They are Rhino, Sabu, Rick Rude, Dreamer, Mike Awesome... see my commons account and put in the articles, please. --81.33.161.149 (talk) 22:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

ONS
I agree that he didn't confirm the actual name. That's why when I added that to the article, I didn't put a name, I put it as TBD. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 23:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Mickie James
i dont know how to do all that, but i have the reference, here http://gallys.legsex.com/pics/202.Alexis.2819/?nats=MzcyNzoyOjY,0,0,0,1144 thats her too, the second magazine!! thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.101.10.142 (talk) 03:57, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied on talk page.  TJ   Spyke   04:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

it was when she was Alexis Laree, not 2007, i dont know why i put 2007, but the set from legsex, is also on Wrestling-News.com http://www.wrestling-news.com/wow/alexislaree.html there it also shows the legshow magazine set, and then another set from something.. link, and the bodies match up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.101.10.142 (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

RE:
I'll get to it. I just didn't know what to add.  Simon KSK  20:58, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅. Not the best, but if you want, you can expand it.  Simon KSK  21:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Re:WWE
"but this is something you should discuss with me"

So, since when do I answer to you? -- Scorpion 0422  02:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Wow, I guess you've never heard of WP:BOLD. It's just a template designed to make things easier. But I guess some people like getting that one guaranteed edit per day. -- Scorpion 0422  03:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost &mdash; February 16, 2009


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  at 07:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

World Tag Team Titles.
You're picking nits TJ.

I thought that whatever brand that WWE.com listed a belt under, that's what we went with here.

I didn't think we took it on ourselves to come to our own conclusions.

Vjmlhds 20:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

But we are taking it upon ourselves to determine what brand a belt belongs to.

The simplest way would be to go with whatever WWE.com has the belts listed under, with a note about any ECW/Raw or ECW/SD crossovers.

It's just very inconsistent to go with WWE.com on some occasions, and not others.

When WWE.com has a title listed under a certain brand, then by default that's the brand it belongs to.

Seems pretty self explanatory to me.

Vjmlhds 20:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

When WWE lists a title under a specific brand, then doesn't that indicate that that title belongs to that brand. Remember the draft, when the champions took their belts with them (and were then listed under the new brand they went to).

Same principle--he who has the belt determines the brand it's listed under.

Just trying to stay consistent.

Vjmlhds 20:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)



Read where it says new championship introduction.

Thank you.

Vjmlhds 20:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Isn't the article saying that (in speculation) that Raw has no tag team titles, since MNM 2.0 have the belts. In other words SD has the WWE tag straps, ECW has the World straps, thus Vince needs to make a third set for Raw?

What am I missing? Seems pretty cut and dry to me.

Vjmlhds 20:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Impact
Oh, I thought I was at 3. I must have miss counted. My fault, I guess I'll have to learn to count.-- Will C  04:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey
it was not speculation, it was on the WWE website at the time I posted it, they must have removed it this morning--Jdrouskirsh (talk) 21:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, well I don't live in America, I live in Australia, (if you didn't know), so I don't know what time it is over there, but um....I'll talk to ya some other time my friend.  Save   Us.  Y2J  4:47, 19 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Hey, sign into Windows Live or when you can.  Save   Us.  Y2J  2:55, 21 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Hey man, sign into Windows Live.  Save   Us.  Y2J  12:14, 28 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

German Wikipedia
[http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:TJ_Spyke Please note. Thank you.] --Hardcore-Mike (talk) 20:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

User talk:210.49.251.226
Just wanted to point out that this user is the indefinately blocked User:AKR619. He doesn't interfer with the the pages i recognise him from, due to having the page semi-protected to stop him, but he has commented on the talk page there (at List of science fiction themes), so i'm certain. So if he gets too annoying with the vandalism and adding unsourced opinion, the blocking admin or sockpuppet report or WP:ANI might be interested. I'm staying away, but keep up the good work!Yobmod (talk) 09:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

List of World Wrestling Entertainment alumni
Do you like the new table? I personally prefer the old one, and want your opinion! Like, come on, in the old one, you could easily find out the date of departure of wrestlers, now you can't. Altenhofen (talk)

Well Yeah, that is an issue, but is there even an "employees who died while under contract" section? I don't believe there is. I also have another question, it doesen't involve wrestling though, and I will ask it at the bottom of the page. Altenhofen (talk) 22:21, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Gail Kim
Go to WWE.com. Go to their menu section (Photos, Exclusives, Videos, etc.) Click on the Videos tab. It states "Gail Kim is coming to SmackDown" thus her return. -- TRU  CO   22:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, but did you check the wording that they have under that video which states Gail Kim is coming to SmackDown [which implies that she is returning to the company]. The problem is that you are placing it as "training" video [that is wording that is not necessary, just a straightforward statement is needed, like that it confirms her return via a promo.-- TRU  CO   22:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's what I meant. I should have been more elaborate. But in a way the video also implies that, why would they have a video of her training for like no reason? -- TRU  CO   22:53, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep, best.-- TRU  CO   23:00, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Sig
Since early summer, last year, I have wanted a custom Signature. I asked someone to make me one, and they did; but it doesen't work.

This is it: Alten hofen 

This is another posibility: Alten hofen 

When I put it in and check the raw signature thing (so it doesen't just turn into a link), it says "Invalid Signature, Check HTML tags".

Could I please get some help? Thanks if the answer is yes. Altenhofen (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

I just looked up HTML Tag on teh site, and I think i know what to do. Altenhofen (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

CM PUnk
I didn't do anything to CM Punk's profile —Preceding unsigned comment added by KafeEman (talk • contribs)
 * I meant Ron Killings.  TJ   Spyke   00:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Re:WWE has them in this order
WWE has them in the following order - WWE, World, ECW, IC, US, World Tag, WWE Tag, Divas/Women's. This revised order is to reflect brand order. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 01:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, WWE has always gone by the order of Raw/ECW/SmackDown. They do this to reflect the weekly schedule order of the brands. In fact, for try-branded PPVs near the end of the brand exclusive PPV era in 2007, WWE ordered the brands as such during the PPVs  -- Unquestionable Truth -- 01:43, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually TJ, following One Night Stand 2007, all PPV intros no longer mention brands. So your statement is false. Here's your GAB 2008 reference -- Unquestionable Truth -- 02:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Again TJ, not to make an issue of this, but - baseless argument. I am open for further discussion. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 04:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The final two PPVs to feature the Raw, ECW, SD intro in that order were JD and ONS. Following that the PPVs were no longer mentioned. I am aware of how they are listed on WWE.com. However, the Raw, ECW, and SD order is done to reflect the scheduled order of the brand (same reason as to why the order was changed as such for the PPV intros near the end of the brand exclusive PPV era). Now if you would like to go by the order WWE lists its titles on WWE.com then the order would be WWE, World, ECW, IC, US, World Tag, WWE Tag, and Divas/Women's. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 05:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Request for help on Eugene O'Neill conflict
As someone who has contributed to the Eugene O'Neill article, perhaps you would be willing to look at the (rather one-sided) discussion on that article's talk page regarding Emerson7's deletion of cited materials, Ah, Wilderness NOT O'Neill's only comedy. I would like to have a Request for Comment process initiated, but must have at least one other editor to have contributed to the discussion before an RfC can be started. Thank you. Monkeyzpop (talk) 21:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

WMXXVI
The source contains confimation from the stadium's operating company, Global Spectrum. per WP:V WP:RS (third-party source) this source is acceptable-- Unquestionable Truth -- 02:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Take it to WP:PW.-- Unquestionable Truth -- 03:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The stadium's operator confirmed the event in the source making any argument over the non-validity of the article baseless. Take it to WP:PW if you have any other concerns. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 03:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The statement is in reference to the economic impact the event is expected to have on the region. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 03:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Done.-- TRU  CO   03:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I do know this TJ. However, after 3 years knowing you and collaborating with you in this project, what I can't believe is... well, recently TJ I've found your lack of faith in me disturbing. Ha-ha. Just kidding. Humor aside though, seriously TJ, I know what your intentions were, and if it were me in your shoes I would have done the same thing and immediately revert something I found to be as sensitive as this due to the nature of wrestling sources. However after years of collaboration I assume we would know by now how each other thinks. Assume good faith TJ. Don't shut people out so quickly and instead work with them to come to an equal end.-- Unquestionable Truth -- 04:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Flair
Not acccording to the WWE Championship article, which is what I based it on. It became known as the WWF World Heavyweight Championship when the promotion left the NWA in 1983. The title began to be referred to as the WWF Championship in 1998. Flair won it in 1992, when, according to the WWE Championship article, it was the "WWF World Heavyweight Championship". ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 13:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I wouldn't know. Don't remember much of wrestling before 1997, so... *shrugs* I was just going by the article. If you want to change it back, feel free to. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

TNA Wrestling Shoot Style Matches
Hey just a quick note to say I deleted the shoot style matches part on the TNA page because they discontinued them because they were unpopular with the fans so I thought it was an irrelevant part of the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilagod101 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost &mdash; February 23, 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:


 * Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
 * An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
 * News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
 * Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
 * Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
 * Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
 * Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  at 22:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Save the Netbooks
Can you please identify specific problems with the Save the Netbooks article so as they can be resolved? The templates are to highlight areas that need cleanup, not to permanently brand articles people don't like - so far there have been very few issues identified and the subject is clearly notable. -- samj <sub style="color:maroon;">in <sup style="color:green;">out 22:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Also, given this is of ZERO benefit to me whatsoever, perhaps you could reconsider your 'delete' vote. Blatant advertising ("Pages that exclusively promote some entity and that would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic") is a basis for a delete vote but this content is definitely encyclopedic. -- <u style="text-decoration:none; font-family: papyrus;">samj <sub style="color:maroon;">in <sup style="color:green;">out 23:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: NOE
I'm not eating any crow, because there was no indication that the name wouldn't have been either of the two. And none of the opposition was saying "well it could be something completely different." It was simply another change, and the articles should be reflected as such. Mshake3 (talk) 02:37, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I'm not changing my habits. The consesus was formed with shitty reasoning, and I just cannot allow users with such terrible reasoning to make decisions around here. Mshake3 (talk) 02:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Who the fuck is Luther Hall?
Seriously. Big Luth (talk) 17:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:DUCK, equals an indef block. -MBK004 19:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah...
...my bad for trying to make Wikipedia accurate. I forgot it was about egos, not articles. Big Luth (talk) 17:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Anyway, why do you want me banned? I've done nothing malicious. Petty. Big Luth (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I'd suggest you actually concentrate on getting articles accurate first... Big Luth (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * It's not right, you know that as well as I do. The only reason the discussion is there and not on the article's talk page is to avoid casual users seeing it. Big Luth (talk) 17:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

How is that vandalism?
I just sourced it to prove its not vandalism. Please stop being so ignorant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richieice (talk • contribs) 01:26, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Dragon Ball
Please pay better attention before you run around leaving people warnings for "vandalizing" the article. I didn't vandalize a damn thing, I restored the last good version of the article after it was vandalized by Canarias. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 00:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

90.202.182.211
This Ip is messing with articles, and I do not know the proper procedure for dealing with IP vandals.  Alten <font color="Gold">hofen   20:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, I sorta knew that, it's just; I haven't given a warning in abou 9 months, an I can't find the page for warnings. I searched for it a bit, but I kept getting the wrong pages.  Alten <font color="Gold">hofen   21:02, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * OK.  Alten <font color="Gold">hofen   21:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

XI
First off im not your "dude" second off and i quote, "-I put a little bit of personal bias in here. It happens whenever something gets "ranked". Now you tell me why we need to opinions that the ppv sucks but we have one saying it was good? Ill put it up to a vote in the talk page but only because i dont want to get blocked again, "bro"LifeStroke420 (talk) 04:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm not saying it wasnt poorly reviewed i think in the opener in the article it pretty clearly says it i dont understand why we need TWO of the same side but one of the other opinion.LifeStroke420 (talk) 04:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Look if you want to keep discussing this take it to XI board im done with you.LifeStroke420 (talk) 04:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost &mdash; 2 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:


 * Books extension enabled
 * News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
 * Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
 * Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Legends of Wrestling Article
I don't appreciate being threatened with being banned for cleaning up a page. Did you even bother to look at what I deleted, or is simply deleting a page section, regardless of content, verboten? I deleted a segment with numerous tags for sources which had been left unsourced for nearly two years; not a single allegation in that section had a source. In addition, I cleaned up one segment which [i]did[/i] carry a source.

In the future, please review alterations to an article before messaging the editor and laying down ultimatums.64.92.13.111 (talk) 01:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Tables
I just checked the linked pages and you seem to be right. I think I'll rollback my edits for now until we get this sorted out. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 03:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't see how it makes it larger, I got 4 FLs promoted in that way and it never came up because that's how sortable tables are. Plus, I review FLC's, so I know.-- ₮  RU  C  Ө   03:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Everything in the sortable columns of that table should be linked. Just because the list is an FL does not mean that it is perfect. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This coming from a strident opponent of overlinking in general—in sortable columns, if one only links the "first" apperance of the term, if you sort the table by other parameters, the term no longer appears first as a link. Therefore, we must link all occurences of the term. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:40, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Exactly what my good friend DaBOMB said. Also, WP:OVERLINK states Link only the first occurrence of an item. A link that had last appeared much earlier in the article may be repeated, but generally not in the same section. (Table entries are an exception to this; each row of a table should be able to stand on its own.). Article size relatively doesn't matter in lists, unless it gets ridiculously long like "the previous version of" List of World Wrestling Entertainment alumni.-- ₮  RU  C  Ө   03:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thats your opinion, but for an FLC to be promoted (and if it has sortable tables), this is what is expected from them.-- ₮  RU  C  Ө   04:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * As for my opinion, if the list were at FLC, I wouldn't oppose over the issue (unless there were other issues) but I wouldn't support. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:23, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Tag Team titles again
TJ, just a note to inform you that L2K has again pushed his view about Morrison and the Miz and changed it again. I reverted it and told him on the talk page that he is misinterpreting the website. ' !! Just a Punk !! ' 08:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Edit to Talk:Wii
The reason I had added  to the article's talk page is so that the talk page would be properly alphabetized in categories like Category:Featured articles that have appeared on the main page. Without the defaultsort, it and a bunch of other sall appear under T for "Talk:[article name]" — Bellhalla (talk) 00:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

WrestleMania 9 main event was Yokozuna vs Hart NOT Hogan...Hogan vs Yokozuna was not the scheduled main event. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roaddawg71 (talk • contribs)
 * Replied on talk page.  TJ   Spyke   20:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

What did I do?
What was so wrong with what I did? I see no harm in my actions.

JD34 (talk) 00:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism? Granted, certain things were a bit, less truthful, but it was hardly vandalism. I meant absolutely no harm. Besides, one of my edits was truthful.

JD34 (talk) 01:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

You know what? I'm not going to argue with you. You're already too butthurt about the truth of TNA to see clearly. And just what integrity does Wikipedia have exactly? There is no institution that I know of that accepts Wikipedia's information. Maybe if someone wanted to learn, they could get up and go to a library and read an actual encyclopedia. But God forbid we should have to go outside. I'm hopping off of my soapbox, maybe you can get off of yours too.

JD34 (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

RE
Okay TJ. It is has been a while since I read it. I haven't read Truco's re-write yet. My bad.--75.90.139.222 (talk) 14:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)