User talk:TKNast

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Midvaal Local Municipality. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mo ainm ~Talk  20:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Midvaal Local Municipality, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Mo ainm ~Talk  20:51, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Midvaal Local Municipality, you will be blocked from editing. Mo ainm ~Talk  21:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Midvaal Local Municipality
Hi TKNast. I have added back some of the details which you had added to Midvaal Local Municipality, and which had been deleted by another editor, as they are verifiable. I note your comments at Talk:Midvaal Local Municipality and have replied there. However, I also note that the citation for the allegations about goings on in the Municipality is a dead link. I have pointed out that, if an accessible citation is not provided within seven days, the sections should be deleted as possibly libellous. You may wish to have a look at FAQ/Organizations. If you are actually the Mayor, and are therefore one of those named, you may find Biographies of living persons useful, as it suggests what can be done where libellous statements appear. Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from subject) indicates how to make a specific complaint.

Hopefully, that will provide you with some idea of how you can proceed. If not, feel free to get back to me. You can always leave a message at my Talk page, and I'll see what I can do to help. Ultimately, the best way of answering the criticism is to counter it with verifiable information. I note on the Municipality's website, for example, that it has received its seventh unqualified audit report. Add quotations from that report to the article: they will answer criticism far more effectively, as they are from an independent source, than anything you could write yourself. Skinsmoke (talk) 01:51, 16 April 2010 (UTC)