User talk:TLSuda/Archive 2

Image deletion
Hello ТимофейЛееСуда. Regarding File:Art sign 1.jpg and File:Art sign 2.jpg. I had forgotten all about those images. They were uploaded for use in a question on the Reference Desk. Since that was nearly four years ago and the question has long been archived and forgotten, I guess it doesn't matter what happens to the images. Thank you for your concern. → Michael J Ⓣ Ⓒ Ⓜ 08:09, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

ConfirmAccount extension
Hey :). You're being contacted because you are involved in the ACC process, or participated in the original discussion in '08 about the ConfirmAccount extension. This is a note to let you know that we are seeking opinions on switching this extension on, effectively making the ACC process via the Toolserver redundant. You can read all the details here; I would be very grateful if people would indicate how they feel about the idea :). Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 13:14, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the invite, but I will not be commenting as I do not have enough experience in the ACC process to formulate a respectable opinion. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  15:01, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Image deletion Kahlil Gibran (Sculptor)
Hello ТимофейЛееСуда. Regarding The Wikipedia page "User talk:Skyphoenix6" has been changed on 18 April 2012 by ТимофейЛееСуда, with the edit summary: Notification: tagging for deletion of File:Vihuela1954Text2.jpg.(TW). These are all of the owners images, we own these images and have allowed public use. Please do not delete. I have added a description to the image. Thank you for your concern. ;→ SkyPhoenix 6 ⓉⒸ


 * Are you "kg" who I assume to be Kahlil Gibran (sculptor)? The original uncropped image has a copyright tag on it which means that the image is copyright, do you actually have the rights to release this in the public domain? If you do not have the rights to this image, then you cannot post it on Wikipedia. If you do own the right, or if there is someone you know who does, they can contact the WP:OTRS by sending a email giving permission to use this image, including the appropriate use tag for the image (PD, CC-BY-SA 2.0, etc). The email can be sent to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org]. Good luck. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 19:46, 18 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello ТимофейЛееСуда.
 * Please go to: to see proof of Public Domain granted by owner.
 * thank you. ;→ SkyPhoenix 6 ⓉⒸ  —Preceding undated comment added 03:25, 19 April 2012 (UTC).


 * I've updated the image information with the website link that you gave into the appropriate places and I have removed the tag. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 11:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

7eventh Time Down
Go take a fresh look!HotHat (talk) 00:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Images
The problem with the link from Facebook is that it's too small: 604×403 pixels, while File:London-dreams-Vipul-Man-behind-the-movie-fabriqate.jpg is 640×427 pixels. I don't think there's really any way to get these G12 speedied. Perhaps you could just take them to WP:PUF? The appearance of comparable images on multiple other pages on dates and sizes not too far removed from the ones here isn't conclusive proof, but I'd guess that it's likely enough that a PUF would result in deletion. Who knows; someone at PUF might even find the originals online at a website you've not found yet. Nyttend (talk) 14:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Image deletion of Mschmidt.jpg
Please see the discussion page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2012_April_27#File:Mschmidt.jpg) of the deletion of this image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mschmidt.jpg Thank you much! --Genya Avocado (talk) 04:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for bring this to my attention. I have withdrawn my nomination. I apologize for not realizing that the subjects in the picture were actors. Have a great day. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  13:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you! & Leaderboard award

 * This person should not be receiving awards for going around deleting things. People who contribute get nothing. People who delete get awards. How this site and project has changed.Aetheling1125 16:19, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Comment
You have targeted a whole load of images I spent a long time creating entirely by myself. You have over zealously targeted them for deletion. I am outraged and disgusted by this Luddite behaviour. I dont know what I have to do to make them accceptable to these self appointed and uncontrolled little policemen. Hand back your Barnstars. Aetheling1125 08:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Greetings. First, I believe that I have found the images you are talking about: Here and Here, but as you left me no way to find out, I'm not 100% sure that is everything you are talking about.  Also, in the future, please leave messages on my talkpage at the bottom, instead of nested inside my archives box.
 * I'm sorry that you are upset about your images, but my nominations and comments about them still stand. I encourage you to join the deletion discussion on the pages above. The images are all replaceable by higher quality images and you haven't been targeted.  I'm currently working on cleaning up images and just happened by yours.  When I looked at the images again, I found that there were even more higher quality images that can replace the ones that you uploaded.  The best course of action for you would be to join the discussion at the above-mentioned pages. Have a great day! -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  13:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Rather than the rather arrogant and high handed attitude some administrators and their like exhibit within Wikipedia why not help by showing me which images you are talking about? I presume you are an expert on the geography of medieval Wales.Aetheling1125 16:17, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The discussions for the images you are talking about are already linked on your talk page and just above, but here they are again:
 * Files_for_deletion/2012_April_26
 * Files_for_deletion/2012_April_26
 * Files_for_deletion/2012_April_29
 * Files_for_deletion/2012_April_29
 * Also, I am not an administrator. I also dislike how you are handling this, and saying that I should not have barnstars for something that I contributed to in a completely different manner is disrespectful. Please continue all commentary about your uploaded images at the appropriate discussion places listed above. Please do not leave me messages on my talk page, as your desire to complain instead of communicating appropriately has made you unwelcome here. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  16:44, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

R1a Map
Thanks, feel free to update it or delete it. I am not going to be able to update any maps till next month. Cadenas2008 (talk) 06:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Just noticed its an old map, that really needs to be updated or replaced. Thanks for pointing that out! Cadenas2008 (talk) 06:09, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

XfD on File:Grandma3.jpg
Hi, I wanted to let you know I removed your file for deletion nomination from File:Grandma3.jpg. It appears you never completed the nomination process. Thought you may want to renominate it. Monty 845  18:24, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notice, sometimes Twinkle lets me down when I nominate. I'll try to check more in the future. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  22:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I found several other editors with an issue that day, perhaps twinkle was just misbehaving for a bit. Monty  845  22:09, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Its possible. Or sometimes when too many of us are XfDing too much at the same time some don't happen correctly. There was a time when none of my XfDs made it because I was consistently edit conflicting with another editor. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  22:12, 12 May 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Kongu veliyan chera queen.JPEG - removed the FfD tag pending renomination, appears twinkle edit conflicted itself resulting in the listing being removed. Monty  845  18:29, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Wow, again. I think that Twinkle must've had some issues. Thanks for noticing again. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  18:37, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Been finding them at Database reports/Old deletion discussions fyi. Monty  845  18:39, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Watermark?
I saw that you placed a "watermark" tag on some of my images: File:T-Bird Cage Theatre.jpg. Are you referring to the date on the lower right hand side which tells when I took the picture? Just wanted to know. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:03, 16 June 2012 (UTC).
 * Yessir. They're very good images, great for the articles that they live in. I just think that they would look better without the date on them.  If you disagree feel free to remove the tag and I won't bother anymore of your images. Also, on a side note, thank you for your service to our country and your work on Wikipedia. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  15:34, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Please see File talk:T-Crystal Palace2.jpg for more response. Remember patience is a virtue. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  16:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * You are a great contributor and a very wise person. My impatience came about because I was confused as to the "Tag". I was wondering what I did wrong. Since the images could be affected by the removal of the dates, I will leave them as is and proceed to remove the "tags". Please accept the following as a token of my appreciation:




 * Thank you, but I'm just working on cleaning up the images. Generally speaking, tags are just to notify that the image can be improved by someone with the programs and the skills. If you see that your images are tagged for something other than FFD, XFD or CSD you have nothing to worry about. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  20:41, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

using internal links for categories
this is how to use links to categories without actually adding the page into categories :) -- D Big X ray  20:44, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I do that all of the time with files. I must've not been paying attention again. Thanks for letting me know though. I'm gonna go have some coffee and wake up! -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  20:57, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[[File:]]
 * Category:Wikipedia files requiring renaming is the category which is populated with files having rename requests. isn't it ? it seems posted the wrong category, i have corrected it. I meant the same :) -- D Big X ray  09:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it is. The incomplete category is for when editors place the tag for images to be moved without putting a new name or reason. I think we are on the same page, and honestly I do not see why we could possibly need both categories. Or if there was one super category. ( sorry, I cannot sign this because I'm responding from my phone, but this is me.) -- THMOPEN REECYRA  (public) 12:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Stefan2 (talk) 19:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * New comment added. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Two more files
File:Sasha OMG!.JPG and File:Claudia OMG.jpg never made it to FFD. You may want to renominate. Monty 845  18:22, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Template:AlvinMakerSeries
An article that you have been involved in editing, Template:AlvinMakerSeries, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 17:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I responded and also posted to the talk page of Orson Scott Card as there might be some interest from page watchers in the discussion. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 17:41, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/NextBus
— Northamerica1000(talk) 20:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Requesting your comments (conclusive, if possible) @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Tadeusz_Sulimirski_.26_Rahul_Sankrityayan — 117.207.62.240 (talk) 09:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your notice, I guess, although I do not know why you wanted me included in this. I do not often post on WP:RSN and I do not have much experience with WP:RS. I also have no knowledge or experience with the specific sources or even the entire field of which this topic covers.  Best of luck in your endeavors though.  -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  14:41, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Bishop Stopford's School at Enfield
Just letting you know that there is no need for threats, I most certainly did not "vandalize" the Bishop Stopford's page as my comments were entirely truthful. Please take note.MichaelHooks (talk) 21:33, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:52, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Tiber.jpg listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:Tiber.jpg. Since you had some involvement with the File:Tiber.jpg redirect, you might want to participate in (if you have not already done so). -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 17:32, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

My talk page
I would appreciate it if you didn't post templated messages on my talk page. Surely, if you have enough spare time in your life to edit on Wikipedia, you coul spare a minute or two to talk to me like a normal human being. I'm not the only one who finds it disrespectful to post templates on other people's talk pages. When I see your signature at the end of a message, I expect to see something you wrote. Please consider that next time you post on my talk page. Thank you, Feed  back  ☎ 18:01, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not telling you that it is "mandatory" to avoid templating my page. You can do as you so please. The essay isn't a guideline, I just linked to it so you could see that I'm not the only person who hates being templated. If you're one of the good ones, you would respect my wishes and the ones of the people who agree with that essay. If you simply don't care and want to keep doing it anyway, that's fine. You get to choose how you carry yourself around Wikipedia. By the way, the reason I don't add it to the "rules" is because I've never had the problem. You're one of the very few [other than the bots] who has sent me a templated message. Like I said, a lot of people consider it in bad taste. You should consider it next time you post on other people's talk pages as well. Feed  back  ☎ 19:00, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Danity Kane image
Hello, ТимофейЛееСуда. I'm dropping by your talk page to alert you of the User talk:JamesBWatson discussion. Flyer22 (talk) 16:27, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Todo
Lake Osborne http://www.flickr.com/photos/myfwcmedia/7051810377/

Patricia Harrison Refs

-- THMOPEN REECYRA  (public) 18:22, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Bain Correctional Center @ DYK
Hi there! Thank you for your hard work on the Vernon C. Bain Correctional Center article. I just reviewed the nomination at DYK, and have some comments over there. Peace, groupuscule (talk) 23:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

SineBot signing your comments
This has happened to me: When you are signing, the links in your signature don't match the same ones as the account that made the post. This post is from my alt account Ihaveamac-alt, and my main is Ihaveamac. My signature has links to my main, but not my alt, so SineBot signed me a few times. Your signature links to ТимофейЛееСуда while the edit was from THMOPENREECYRA. You can add to User talk:THMOPENREECYRA (might still work even though it's a redirect) and SineBot will ignore your comments. ~ihaveamac &#91;talk&#124;contribs&#93; 05:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Vernon C. Bain Correctional Center
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:01, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

vandalism
My edit to Dina Manfredini was NOT vandalism. Please read edit summaries before accusing people of it. Besse Cooper died today, and Dina is now the oldest person in the world. Silenceisgod (talk) 22:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you have proof that Besse Cooper died? Do you have information from a WP:RS? If so, please add it, and I will remove the vandalism tag I added.  If not, find something more useful to do with your time. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  22:58, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

I am in the wrong, I apologize, I thought that reliable sources had already appeared. The information, at least, is almost certainly correct. Reliable sources will probably appear in a few hours. Silenceisgod (talk) 23:11, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * You weren't in the wrong, and I replied with more information on your talk page. I did remove the tag, and added the source that I found as to avoid drama.  Happy editing. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  23:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

User:ТимофейЛееСуда/Alex Pyron
Per request. Spartaz Humbug! 02:08, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Re:WP:DYKSTATS
You can do one-day statistics, but subtracting an average per-day view of two days makes numbers more accurate. For example, The Day of dyk - (Day before + Day After)/2 = Total. Even when an article reaches 5,000 views in one day, the average may affect those numbers. Got it? --George Ho (talk) 00:34, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Images
Thanks! :D It's no problem. Hopefully I can keep the watermark and borders categories as low as I can.  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  22:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm glad someone is working on those. I've been very slowly (over a year) trying to bring down the images missing descriptions category and I find images that need work, and you've been taking care of every single one!  Thanks for your work! -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .

Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges. A full list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on will be at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. INeverCry  19:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

With all due respect.
With all due respect, your deletion nominations at Files for deletion/2013 February 23 shows how out of touch with the rules you are. For many of the images you nominated, they are all free, as labelled by the uploader. I won't talk about those with questionable sources, but for those whose uploaders have specifically mentioned that they are released on public domain, please understand that the WP:NFCC rules on non-orphan images and notability only applies to non-free images, not free images. Just as well, there is nothing in the image use policy that says that such rules of the need to be notable and the need to be used in more than one article applies to free images. There is nothing in WP:CSD that calls for the above rules to apply to public domain images as well. This reason is obvious: because free images are allowed to be freely used in the userspace, by users on their own user and talk pages, as and how they like, because they are completely free.

I suggest that you familiarise yourself with the rules of Wikipedia before you start voting, nominating, or even counselling me on what is right and wrong. Optakeover (Talk)   16:37, 28 February 2013 (UTC)


 * First of all, you absolutely do mean any respect: you checking my contributions to find what else I have done so you can complain is WP:HARRASMENT and completely against WP:AGF. Second off, if you are going to do that simply because you do not like my discussion, actually look a little further into my history.  I've nominated and voted on more images successfully than you have made edits on your entire account.  I wish I could give you exact numbers, but I know my percentages for being successful are rather high.  I've also successfully transferred a good number (more than 500) images from here to WP:Commons so I know a thing or two about copyright and what belongs and what doesn't.  Third, please learn to use the "show preview" button, as it took you 7 tries to get out two simple paragraphs of text and you've been doing the same on every discussion.  That button is there for a reason, not just for decoration.  Last, your discussion is completely flawed.  Why are you bringing up WP:CSD for?  If I were claiming that there was an issue that falls in that section, I would nominate it as WP:CSD, not WP:FFD or WP:PUF. Also, Wikipedia is all about consensus.  I am allowed my opinion in appropriate places, and you obviously are allowed yours.  That is what discussion is all about.  If you don't like what I do, or how I think, bring it up somewhere important and with some actual diffs of what I've done and what rules I've violated. If you cannot do that, do not try to attack me on my own talk page.  Finally, if you continue to follow me around like you did here: Files for deletion/2013 February 23, and harass me as such, I have absolutely no problem starting the WP:Dispute resolution process.  From this point forward, you are no longer welcomed to post on my talk page unless you have official notices to place. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  18:46, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * As a side note, when you say something like "I will certainly say that this is the last comment I'll make for this discussion" usually people do not continue commenting, and saying someone is flat out wrong in a discussion, instead of discussing simply because you do not agree with their opinion is fairly childish. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 18:50, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

File moves
Hey mate! Thank you very much for your efforts in improving Wikipedia! Anyway, please be reminded to remove rename media in files that you will be moving to reduce the files in category at CAT:RENAME. Thanks and have a nice day! :) Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 02:33, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Darn flabbit. I usually do, and recently reminded a few other people earlier this week.  I was trying to migrate the photos to Commons (unsuccessfully) and did not check my work.  Thanks for the notice :). -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  03:16, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

FFU
If you upload an file, than please tag the file's tag page with {{subst:WPAFCF}}. And notify the requester with, if you don't add the picture to any article. Armbrust The Homunculus 06:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Aha! Thanks for catching that and letting me know. I'm learning a lot from your processes and I hope I'm helping at least a little instead of causing more work for you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  15:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Re: My misadventures at FFU
Thank you my friend for correcting those faulty checks of mine! I am very, very new to the File namespace and am zealously learning all the rules as I come up against them. Sadly, trial and error is still the way I learn best - how great that smarter people than I often spot me making a merry mess! I am sorry to make you more work. I hope to become more familiar with procedure and avoid possible mistakes in the future! All the best. Cheers! -The Illusive Man (T.I.M(Contact) 02:30, 1 May 2013 (UTC))
 * I can understand trial and error just fine. But images is a fun and messy business. I've been in the file space for a few years and I still consistently make mistakes.  I recommend looking back to see what others have done.  (check the archives) Also, with WP:FFU if the file is approved, you actually have to upload it for them like you would if it were your own image, that's the entire point of the FFU.  -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  02:43, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Matuto performing at the RECBEAT Festival in Recife, Brazil.jpg
Hello, On Tue, 30th April 2013, I saw that someone approved the file upload, but on 1st May 2013, I see that you have declined the request stating "The license on the Flickr page (where the owner of the photo posted it) is what needed to be changed." Once I have requested the owner to change file's license in Flickr, then again I have to re-request the File For Upload process? Regards. -- Dhurbaba. 8:29 AM, 1st May 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for writing and I apologize for myself not explaining fully the situation and another editor improperly closed your request. The editor who closed your request was very eager to help out, but did not understand completely the WP:FFU process.  I'm glad you reached out though, if you can get the owner of the photo to change the license to CC-by-SA 2.0 or CC-by 2.0, I would be more than happy to upload the image for you.  As it stands with the current copyright, we do not have the right nor the permission to host the image on our servers.  Thanks again and happy editing -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  18:15, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. The owner of the photo (http://www.flickr.com/photos/95139912@N02/8670003379/in/photostream) has changed the file's license to CC BY-SA 2.0. Thanks again, Dhurbaba. 18:51, May 1, 2013 (UTC)


 * Done! Image is at File:Matuto at the Rec Beat Festival Recife BR 2.23.09.jpg. Thanks for your patience. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 00:01, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

File:JamesFranco jpg.jpeg
Wrong url! You put http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/28/JamesFranco_jpg.jpeg in the speedy template - Sad to say, I've done exactly the same in the past... I deleted it as a F9 of http://bestof.provocateuse.com/show/james_franco   Ron h jones  (Talk) 22:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm wondering...
Hello ТимофейЛееСуда, I'm Kevjonesin. I noticed that you'd flagged File:Polkinghorne.hood1.JPG for deletion. As this comes so soon after I edited the image (I obscured the plate #'s) and removed the cleanup template I'm led to wonder if it's merely a coincidence or if my interacting with the file somehow made it show up on another list/category which brought it to your attention. I'd found it on a list of images flagged for editing. Anyway, it's of interest to me because I'd prefer, in the future, to avoid editing images that are likely to be deleted soon after. --Kevjonesin (talk) 22:01, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Hey! Very good question. I tagged the image for cleanup nearly a year ago in June 2012 and added it to my watchlist.  The image was tagged before the article that it was used in was deleted.  Since it was deleted as being non-notable, the image really is useless at this point. When you uploaded the new version, it popped onto my watchlist and I nominated it.  I apologize for this. I'll try to check my watchlist real quick to make sure there aren't any other issues.  Can I make a suggestion? Maybe only edit images that are currently in use first, then go back and clean up the rest later? Thanks for your work. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  02:36, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * "Maybe only edit images that are currently in use...", Yep, that same thought was dawning on me as well. Thanks for confirming my suspicions. In the future, I'll be more careful choosing which images to edit. p.s. This may amuse you. Brief Art Car video (filmed at a local festival). --Kevjonesin (talk) 15:04, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Tagging talk page of uploaded files
Is there a reason why you don't tag the talk page of the uploaded files with {{subst:WPAFCF}}? Armbrust The Homunculus 05:33, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * There is no good reason, save for I did not realize I was missing this step. Thanks for fixing my errors and letting me know. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 14:06, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:James Walter.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:James Walter.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 15:20, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_upload#Sue_Bell_Cobb.jpg
Thanks for uploading the image. However, Cobb is the woman in the purple shirt. The cropped version you uploaded is of Nina Totenberg, who was leading the panel. Can you please correct this? -208.81.148.195 (talk) 17:40, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
 * That said, Totenberg's article does not have a photo, either, so it would be good to rename the mistaken image to Nina_Totenberg.jpg or something similar and add it to Nina Totenberg. -208.81.148.195 (talk) 18:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know. I've re-cropped and the new image is here File:Sue Bell Cobb USDOJ panel.jpg  I'm awaiting a Commons file mover to fix the naming (I've requested) since I only have file mover rights here. Sorry for the mix-up. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  21:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey, not a problem. I appreciate the help with the uploads. -208.81.148.195 (talk) 13:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Blank Label
Template:Blank Label has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. LukeSurlt c 10:03, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Port Vale FC 2013.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Port Vale FC 2013.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 08:23, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rick Austin (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Demorest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

EC
The time stamp shows that was clearly an edit conflict! Did you not see that you subsequently deleted MY comment? Should you be warned for that? Keri (talk) 00:13, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Keri (talk) 00:14, 25 August 2013 (UTC)