User talk:TLeek

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company, organization, or clients. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 18:38, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Here are a few key questions:
 * Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
 * Do you understand conflict of interest?
 * Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Daniel Case (talk) 14:06, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * In view of your stated editing intention you should also look at original research policy.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:20, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

{unblock-spamun|TLeek|Hi, since I originally attempted to write about my amateur hobby passion that has resulted in Visual Micro I have learned alot about wikipedia. Actually, my intention has never been to spam and I do provide free software to thousands or happy people. However, I do also now understand that with so many web users there needs to be a difference between writing about a passionate achievement that one is proud of and writing a factual unbiased document. I do now realize that in wikipedia terms there can be little distinction between a commercial overview of a product and an overview of a hobby product. I realize now that they are both just products. My original attempt to write about a unique extension to Visual Studio might have been more acceptable if I had concentrated more on the architecture used to create an alliance between two famous products "Microsoft and Arduino". Two manufacturers that often have nothing in common. Furthermore since my original attempt to write about a product instead of a factual article I have invented the first and only debugger for Arduino development. I would like to write about how the debugger works and how it can allow Visual Studio to do what the Arduino does not allow to be done. Again this will be a factual and accurate description of protocols and the architecture required to achieve this result. This might be submitted to wikipedia as a general overview of the various concepts under the Visual Micro page linking to child pages that describe the various mechanisms and protocols used on an avr/Arduino mcu and in Visual Studio. I hope to extend these pages over time to become a useful guide allowing other developers to implement similar solutions. I request a name change because whilst I will certainly write some topics under the Visual Micro page I would also like to expand other areas that I or others have created without appearing to plug or use the Visual Micro name. In the past, I know I would have got blocked anyway for reasons described in my response.

However, I also did not do myself justice when it came to the notable perspective! Actually, Microsoft have blogged my solution twice without my requesting them to do so and many other sources such as "Dangerous Prototypes" have also published my work.

Dangerous prototypes

You can see in this article that Microsoft make the point that they and Arduino are not normally connected. Greg Duncan of Microsoft goes on to say ... "While I don't usually highlight Arduino related projects, since there's often little Microsoft relation"

Microsoft Blog 2

However "cheap" internet links aside many teachers and professors have also written to me or published articles. I will attempt to include some links below this topic of these articles. I made a statement about the unique nature of my work, recently I achieved my first "hard copy" recognition in a published book by Jack Purdman. I do not know Jack but as you will read on his amazon page he is an accomplished and well regarded author of programming books. You can download beginning_c_for_arduino.pdf from www.it-ebooks.info and read the following on page 236. Jack contacted me to ask if he could publish this, he told me he would have made half the book about the debugger had the book not already reached such late stages of production.

"Published Book: Beginning C for Arduino appendix a ■ Suppliers and Sources Page 236 Title: Software Unfortunately, VisualMicro’s software debugger for the Arduino only came to my attention just a few days before the final page proofs were set. As most programmers know, the weakest link in writing code using the Arduino IDE is the lack of useful debugging tools. As it stands, Serial.Print function calls are often used to observe values as a program executes. Not any more. The Arduino debugger from VisualMicro is actually a program add-in for Microsoft’s Visual Studio. The Visual Studio debugger is full featured with various debug windows, breakpoints, and single-stepping features. As you can see in the figures, the Arduino is completely integrated into the Visual Studio IDE. The first figure shows the ability to open an Arduino project from within Visual Studio while the second shows how there are combo boxes for the Arduino boards and COM port selection."

Jack Purdum Amazon Page

I hope you can see that I do now understand, thanks for the pointers Visual Micro (talk) 23:12, 15 April 2013 (UTC)


 * You are not allowed to write here about your own inventions or discoveries. They may become encyclopedically notable when/if they are covered by neutral third-party sources, although even then you might fall foul of conflict of interest policy.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:52, 19 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello, your username change request has not been accepted because you must be logged in with your account (Visual Micro) to make a request. Please log in and make a note at the request page. Danger High voltage! 19:26, 4 May 2013 (UTC)