User talk:TMHaines MS.Ed.

Welcome!
Hello, TMHaines MS.Ed., and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kelm Pond, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RA 0808 talkcontribs 13:57, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Kelm Pond


The article Kelm Pond has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of meeting WP:GNG, WP:NGEO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RA 0808 talkcontribs 13:57, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! I like to review new pages and help them succeed. It would be worthwhile to look at Wikipedia's guidelines on verifiability and original research and see if you can improve and reference your article based on reliable sources somehow. If you cannot if no verifiable sources exist, it may end up being deleted. Wikipedia relies on these core standards of verifiability, neutral point of view, and no original research to help it be a source of information people can trust and rely on. Phil (talk) 14:28, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Kelm Pond for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelm Pond is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kelm Pond until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RA 0808 talkcontribs 04:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)