User talk:TManzer

Jackie Speier
I have reverted all your undoubtedly good faith edits on Jackie Speier for a number of reasons. First, much of the text was flowery full of what Wikipedia calls puffery ad peacock phrasing. It extolled her performance and certainly was a very unbalanced view. I am sure that Ms Speier is a wonderful person and an excellent member of Congress and I am sure that you are probably a loyal employee of hers, but that just isn't how Wikipedia works. Every claim and every assertion needs to be supported by a reliable reference. Simple facts such as her position in congress can be sourced to the official government website, but anything about her success and failures should be sourced to wholly independent and reliable sources (probably not FOX news). If you are an employee or intern of Ms Spieier or of the Democratic party or anything associated with the political machine in the US you must declare that on your user page (See WP:COI) and if you wish to resume editing, please read other well structured pages of US politicians before trying again. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:22, 3 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Ah, now I see, perhaps choosing a different user name would have helped conceal your role, but I do commend you for your honesty. So, yes you DO have a conflict of interest and yes, you MUST make a declaration on your user page before making any other edits. Hope that helps, and for what little it may be worth, please do a good job, we need your employer to succeedd if the world is going to have a half decent chance of survival.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:28, 3 September 2019 (UTC)