User talk:TNNSUH

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Houston Cougars men's basketball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Young. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aleksandar Kovačević (tennis)


The article Aleksandar Kovačević (tennis) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. No major success on the professional or the collegiate level of tennis"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adamtt9 (talk) 12:38, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Aleksandar Kovačević (tennis) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aleksandar Kovačević (tennis) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aleksandar Kovačević (tennis) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adamtt9 (talk) 17:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you recently removed all content from 2022–23 Illinois State Redbirds men's basketball team. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen Folf  (talk)  19:43, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Sorry you caught up in all that
Your edits to the Kirby Smart page sort of got caught up in a crossfire of intense vandalism and reverts. The editor that reverted you I'm sure was acting in extremely good faith. I myself may be guilty also if your edits were not restored. Forgive us. Please feel free to make any needed changes now that the page has calmed down a little. -- DB 1729 talk 05:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: J'Wan Roberts has been accepted
 J'Wan Roberts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=J%27Wan_Roberts help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 08:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Deletion tagging
Hello, TNNSUH,

It is considered good form to notify page creators when you tag an article or page they created for deletion (whether CSD, PROD or AFD/MFD/CFD/RFD/etc.). The easiest way to do this is by making use of Twinkle, an editing tool that helps editors with so many tasks from tagging articles for problems to reporting vandals to noticeboards to setting up deletion discussions to posting all sorts of notifications to User talk pages. Twinkle basically remembers all of the templates you might need so you don't have to search them out when you need them. It's very user-friendly and is used by most page patrollers and many administrators on a regular basis. Just be sure when setting up your Twinkle Preferences to check the box saying "Notify page creators" and then any time you tag a page for deletion, Twinkle will inform page creators about the tagging. Notifying content creators an important step in the deletion process and I'm sure you woud want to be notified if any page you created might be deleted. I encourage you to try it out. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:09, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Invitation
Hello ! Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
 * The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
 * We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
 * Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
 * Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
 * If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Sent by using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

College colors in articles
Hello, please do not remove the templates as you did in this edit, as you've made them unreadable and no accessible for those who are color blind. I've reverted your edits. Thanks, Corky  00:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Louisville Cardinals football
What happened is I was going by the correct source, but misreading it. Good catch. Stefen Towers among the rest!  Gab • Gruntwerk 01:32, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Houston cougars
Since you seem to not understand how things work here, you don't revert a comment on your talk page with an edit summary responding. You respond on the comment. Second, parameter descriptions are based on consensus reached over time, I don't have to point to a conversation to prove this, the parameter description proves it. The description mentions nothing about using tooltip so no it's not in compliance. And finally for millionth time other articles inclusion of content is not a valid justification for inclusion. I explained to you that the tooltip thing started with a single editor doing it then it became a domino effect. That editor is not involved with college basketball project and I've had issues with the editor in the past going against standards in the project.-- Rockchalk 717 02:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Seems like a nonsensical reason for something so harmless like tooltip, despite the fact that it offers more insight as to what players were tied for those who might be curious. Why are you only focused on enforcing it on one page though and not all current or past NCAA season pages that don't use Tied? TNNSUH (talk) 03:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

What does the non-consensus chart mean in the context of a tennis profile
Why are you removing the Records against top 10 players section on all tennis pages, like Alex Michelsen what does the non-consensus chart mean, I am confused. Can you point me to where is the consensus to remove this information collected for years, in a lot of the cases, by contributors? Tagging Mfog99 as he was experiencing the same issue, the same section under Jannik Sinner being deleted in his career statistics page.Sashona Sashona 00:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis/Archive 21 TNNSUH (talk) 07:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Why, because I don’t see any survey or reached consensus after voting, I see only a discussion. This needs to be brought up and voted on, not based on a singles opinion by user @Fyunck(click) Do you agree with me @Mfog99? Sashona (talk) 20:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I believe this was also discussed on multiple player talk pages such as Iga Swiateks prior to project tennis. The charts were original research and trivial.... very difficult to know if they were accurate. A top 10 (at the time) victory chart was more than adequate. This was far from a single opinion. And most discussions at Tennis Project are not handled by an rfc where editors from every aspect of Wikipedia join in. Most editors from non-sports projects hate the number of charts we have and want most of them removed.. far more than just these trivial charts. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Do you have an opinion on that? Would like your feedback. Sashona (talk) 21:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Can you please point me to the conversation where the consensus was reached on having ONLY top 10 Wins and not having Wins AND Losses? In meantime do not make changes to the Record against top 10. Sashona (talk) 04:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * There was discussion here, here, and here. There was even a discussion on Village Pump that was archived. The only sort of consensus reached was to leave all top 10 matches/win related charts at wins only. Please leave all top 10 charts as is for the time being please. If you want to include losses as well to players who were in the top 10 at the time of the match and add it to the current consensus wins chart, then suggest it on wiki project tennis. Do not just go around including it as you see fit. TNNSUH (talk) 00:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

About my edition
I talked with Fyunck(click) |Fyunck(click) about this Topic - He wrote back that if said player never played a ATP Challenger final (winner or runner-up) the term "ATP Challenger" should be removed, with only "ITF World Tennis Tour" displayed on Section Name 45.183.133.107 (talk) 23:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Makes sense. For convenience purposes, I always just assumed it was easier to already include it when first making the table. Thanks for clarifying. TNNSUH (talk) 00:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)