User talk:TParis/Anon

PrimeFaces
Are you serious? PrimeFaces is one of the most popular rich UI library for JAVA EE.

http://www.primefaces.org/whouses.html

70.000 posts, and more than 10.000 users in forum: http://forum.primefaces.org/

2679 followers on twitter: https://twitter.com/primefaces — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cagatay.civici (talk • contribs) 10:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * We don't judge notability based on how many forum hits you have. If PrimeFaces gets covered in published media, we'll cover it here.  That's our threshold.  Feel free to read WP:GNG.--v/r - TP 14:15, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

The Lost Brothers
Seems you deleted them in haste. Consistent plays on BBC radio, reviews in NME and other national press in the Europe and the US, new album produced by Brendan Benson and a string of high-profile festival dates in the UK over this summer.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/6fc55837-46a5-48a6-88fb-928cbe3c5db4 http://www.npr.org/2012/06/04/154302259/the-lost-brothers-on-world-cafe-next http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/theticket/2012/0113/1224310189919.html http://www.nme.com/news/the-basement/40181 http://thelostbrothersband.com/?pressarticles=nme-album-review21st-october-2008 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/acrosstheline/2011/11/the_lost_brothers_find_new_alb.html

Perhaps you'd like to reconsider? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.132.113 (talk) 10:53, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It wasn't in haste. It was in compliance with the speedy deletion criteria.  Feel free to create it with your sources though.  It's not like an WP:AFD where it can't be recreated without a review.--v/r - TP 12:58, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * maybe you'd like to put some work in, since you took it down? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.132.113 (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I misunderstood. Are you one of those people who believes that if I go out and buy two trash-can lids and bang them in my garage and call myself 'Super Awesome Man Band' that I should get an article?  Articles get deleted when they do not meet criteria.  That one slips through because the person who created it lacked the knowledge to avoid a speedy deletion simply by explaining why that band stands out from all of the endless bands that got created yesterday is not my problem.  If you have a concern, address the system.  Otherwise, troll someone else or go create the page since you seem so very interested.  (And then you can go whine on ANI about how IPs get treated horribly despite the fact that you came to my talk page trying to pick a fight).--v/r - TP 19:53, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * nice attitude and great way to welcome a new user. thanks for your utter lack of assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.132.113 (talk) 18:33, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Your approach to getting help seems to be lacking. Being a smart ass (ref "maybe you'd like to put some work in, since you took it down?") is not the way to get help.--v/r - TP 20:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * another trigger happy American who'd rather fight than help? goodbye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.65.16.77 (talk) 20:33, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Another guy who doesn't put up with rudeness. The both of you could learn a lesson in manners.  Not falling on my knees and taking it from you doesn't make me trigger happy.--v/r - TP 21:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Chill TParis. This is a prime example of Right to Write. This editor wanted to add to The Lost Brothers page on wikiepdia. Because it didn't meet the "criteria" you took it down. I think you should be more patient with this new user. If his first entry didn't meet criteria, JUST TELL HIM TO GO BACK AND FIX IT! Don't delete it and make him write it out again! Wikipedia editors sure have a backwards way of thinking. Instead of embracing his new info. You took it down without any comment. Support Right to Write and help users edit Wikipeda more freely!

Sincerely, A former Wikipedia editor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.212.194 (talk) 05:15, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Telford accent
You have arranged for a page that I created to be deleted: 'Telford accent'. I know it didn't contain any sources or references, but I am also a proud Salopian and was born and brought up in Telford, where I live currently. I am also a qualified linguist with a life-long experience of working in languages. Surely in a 'free' encyclopedia, it's better to have an unreferenced page than nothing at all, as long as it clearly says that it is unreferenced at the top of the article. I find it very insulting that articles can be deleted, when this encyclopedia is supposed to be 'free'. What a load of rubbish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stewart Bayliss (talk • contribs) 10:28, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Can you find any sources for it at all? I'd be happy to restore it if you can find something to reference it with.  Your a linguist?  Is it in any of your books?--v/r - TP 13:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Right to Write
Mr. TParis. Please let users that are trying to help Wikipedia with their knowledge edit pages. All of you editors always say "It must be properly cited" blah blah blah. You fail to understand that some people just want to share their knowledge and may not, cannot, or don't want to cite. I know there are vandals that try to trash Wikipedia and aren't trying to add to the website. Please let users that just want to say there was an alternate listing to the Pink Floyd album Wish You were Here say that! Let editors tell their story. How can that harm the website! It's just making it better! This site suffers from being boring. The tone of the writing in Wikipedia is monotone. If you just let editors express themselves freely, then Wikipedia would be much better.

Sincerely, A former Wikipedia editor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.212.194 (talk) 05:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * "some people just want to share their knowledge" - And I want to be an astronaut. We can't all have what we want.  There are policies for a reason.  Go make your own spam-fest-o-pedia.org that they can share their knowledge on.--v/r - TP 21:12, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Deleted page "Dr. Michael L. Brown"
About a year ago, you deleted this page (formerly located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Michael_L._Brown).

Obviously, I am a Wikipedia newbie, but I assure you I am a disinterested party, with no ties to any religious group or to Dr. Brown himself.

Dr. Michael L. Brown is definitely important enough to have a Wikipedia page--particularly considering that Michael Glyn Brown, "former hand surgeon" and "fixture of Houston TV commercials and society," still has a page. Dr. Michael L. Brown, the Messianic apologist whose page you deleted, is author of 22 books and numerous articles, including 28 in the Oxford Dictionary of Jewish Religion. He has a Ph.D. from NYU, a popular radio show, and an appreciable audience (6,300+ Facebook "likes"). He is best known for being the main Messianic opponent of "America's Rabbi" Shmuley Boteach, and has debated Boteach publicly several times. (Boteach frequently names Dr. Brown as a recommended source for Messianic/Christian perspective on Judaism.)

Even if you think this guy is wacky--and I assure you he is a lot less wacky than other Messianic Christian evangelists--he is important enough to merit a page on Wikipedia. Please restore his page if there is any possibility of doing so. If there isn't, I think you owe it to the community to work on creating a new page for him, or at least a stub, because this deletion was definitely a mistake. Thank you. 96.231.219.240 (talk) 14:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC)SAH
 * Do you have 3rd party sources that cover the subject? News, books, ect that are about Dr. Brown?--v/r - TP 21:11, 9 September 2012 (UTC)