User talk:TPogliani

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlalberto Guglielminotti (December 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carlalberto Guglielminotti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Carlalberto_Guglielminotti Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jamiebuba&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Carlalberto_Guglielminotti reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 08:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello TPogliani. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:NHOA Group, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:TPogliani. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @TPogliani you need to do this on your user page, not the article page. ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 15:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Dear Eejit43, Dear Eejit43, thank you very much for your suggestion. I have just updated my user page according to your recommendation. Please let me know if any information or modifications are needed on the article. TPogliani (talk) 15:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for declaring! The article needs a lot of work for it to be ready for mainspace, there are a lot of claims that aren't backed up by reliable sources, it reads like and advertisement, and notability isn't proven. ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 15:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Dear Eejit43, Many thanks for you help. Could you please help me in understanding how I can modify my contribution to adhere to Wikipedia's policies? Maybe could you provide me with a few examples of how to properly modify/cancel this information? many thanks. Terry TPogliani (talk) 10:38, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Practically the entirety of the "Business Units" section is filled with unnecessary information and promotional wording, such at robust, push the boundaries, and many more. See WP:PUFF for more information. ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 12:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NHOA Group (February 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NHOA Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:NHOA_Group Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:NHOA_Group reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, thank you for your feedback. I disclosed a conflict of interest by choosing "I’m writing about myself, or a close person/subject" during the initial account registration. As actually I am currently an employee of NHOA Group, I proceeded to insert on the page as you suggested the disclosure.
 * However I'm probably making some errors in the prosses as it appears that I did not used the right template.
 * I hope this can help to proceed with my request on behalf of my employer NHOA Group. The energy sector is broadly represented on Wikipedia and we are an innovative and fast growing part of it. For this reason, we think that from an encyclopedic point of view the absence of a dedicated page may be a shortcoming. A more and more wide audience is seeking credible information and solutions on energy transition. Being recognized in the industry for our purposeful commitment to research and innovation, our request is to open our sustainable business model and our know how to a passionate and reliable community like Wikipedia.
 * Hoping you can take into consideration my submission, many thanks again for your help in correctly proceeding with the submission of this page.
 * Best regards,
 * Teresa Pogliani TPogliani (talk) 09:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Teresa Pogliani TPogliani (talk) 09:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)